Skip to contentSkip to conversation

swsusp 2.4.18 vs 2.5.40

DISCUSSION [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Oct 2, 2002 – Oct 8, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Brian Litzinger

[swsusp in 2.4.18 works pretty well but...]

Quoted 2 lines · Pavel Machek

Yep, swsusp is not really meant to work in 2.4.X. Get latest 2.5.X... and add IDE patches so it does not eat your disk...

Ok, I've compiled and tried 2.5.40.

Zip. Nada. swsusp doesn't show up at all. If I compile with SMP turned on I get a message about swsusp being incompatible with SMP. Running UP it doesn't show up in the boot log, though it looks to be compiled.

It also doesn't show in the SysRq help list.

echo'ing things to /proc/acpi/sleep does nothing.

Signature · 1 line
Brian Litzinger
#1 lore raw

HI!

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Yep, swsusp is not really meant to work in 2.4.X. Get latest 2.5.X... and add IDE patches so it does not eat your disk...

Ok, I've compiled and tried 2.5.40.

Quoted 8 lines

Zip. Nada. swsusp doesn't show up at all. If I compile with SMP turned on I get a message about swsusp being incompatible with SMP. Running UP it doesn't show up in the boot log, though it looks to be compiled.

It also doesn't show in the SysRq help list.

echo'ing things to /proc/acpi/sleep does nothing.

Bad test in acpi/sleep.c; then IDE fix is needed and andrew's mm patch to really free memory.
Pavel

Signature · 2 lines
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.