Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Known 'issues' about 2.4.19...

DISCUSSION DervishD 5 participants 7 messages Oct 13, 2002 – Oct 14, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore

DervishD

author
#0 lore raw

Hi all :))

Is there any known bug or other issues about 2.4.19 that prevents
it from being used in a production machine? I mean, I don't worry if the sound is broken or things like those, I mean if the IDE driver does 'things' and the like ;))

I'm thinking about going to 2.4.19 or the latest -ac for 2.4.20.

Thanks a lot :)
Raúl

#1 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines

Is there any known bug or other issues about 2.4.19 that prevents it from being used in a production machine? I mean, I don't worry if the sound is broken or things like those, I mean if the IDE driver does 'things' and the like ;))

I used it for three months for desktop use without a single problem. I only stopped when I moved over to the 2.5.x tree, once the IDE problems had been fixed.

#2 lore raw
In reply to DervishD
Quoted 3 lines · DervishD

Hi all :))

Is there any known bug or other issues about 2.4.19 that prevents

Bonding is broken.

Signature · 2 lines
Andreas Steinmetz
D.O.M. Datenverarbeitung GmbH
author
#3 lore raw

Hi Andreas :)

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line

Is there any known bug or other issues about 2.4.19 that prevents

Bonding is broken.

Do you refer to NIC bonding? Anyway, I don't know what 'bonding'
is, just I've heard the word related to NIC O:)))

Thanks Andreas :)

Raúl

#4 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · DervishD

Hi Andreas :)

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

Is there any known bug or other issues about 2.4.19 that prevents

Bonding is broken.

Do you refer to NIC bonding? Anyway, I don't know what 'bonding'
is, just I've heard the word related to NIC O:)))

It lets you use two ethernet cards as a single interface, assuming the switch they're plugged into supports it. Cheap way to get 200 mbps throughput, especially with a switch that only does gigabit on the uplink port.

See Documentation/networking/bonding.txt in the kernel tarball...

Rob

#5 lore raw
In reply to DervishD

Hi Raúl,

I've been using 2.4.19 for a couple of months already. Generally speaking, I've had no probls with it. I recently found out its IDE subsystem doesn't get along too well with VIA chipsets (replaced my old mobo for a VT8233 based recently and probls started surfacing). Basically, I am unable to rip audio tracks from my cds (/var/log/messages logs a lot of timeouts).

This is a real PITA, but kernel folks are already aware of it and and it's going through major reimplementation on 2.5.x branch, AFAIK. Also, I've seen increasing activity on VIA's Linux forums (this issue has surfaced a couple of times there as well), so there's hope VIA might start working closer to the Linux community.

Aside from this, I've been using it daily at home, for all sorts of things.

HTH,

Andre

Quoted 16 lines · On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:40:52 +0200 DervishD <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all :))

Is there any known bug or other issues about 2.4.19 that prevents
it from being used in a production machine? I mean, I don't worry if the sound is broken or things like those, I mean if the IDE driver does 'things' and the like ;))

I'm thinking about going to 2.4.19 or the latest -ac for 2.4.20.

Thanks a lot :)
Raúl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Signature · 1 line
Andre Oliveira da Costa
author
#6 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines

subsystem doesn't get along too well with VIA chipsets (replaced my old mobo for a VT8233 based recently and probls started surfacing).

    I have a VIA8363 (82C686B) AKA KT133/KM133, running perfectly

with 2.4.18 at the time. Will this be a problem with 2.4.19?

Quoted 2 lines

Aside from this, I've been using it daily at home, for all sorts of things.

Thanks for your answer, Andre :))

Raúl