Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Linux 2.5.44-ac4

DISCUSSION Dave Jones 2 participants 2 messages Oct 27, 2002 2 messages not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

Dave Jones

author
#2 lore raw

[cc:'d back to l-k where this belongs]

Quoted 4 lines · Peter L Jones

The mce.c entries are excluded by "#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE". For some reason, the entire subdirectory has been built but the processor-specific modules don't have any CONFIG_X86_MCE protection. This one's beyond my skill even to attempt to fix. I guess I'll turn on machine check exceptions...

Oops, it's broken if CONFIG_X86_MCE=n
Change arch/i386/kernel/cpu/Makefile line 16 to read
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_MCE) += mcheck/
and it should be ok..

Dave

Signature · 2 lines
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
#3 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Dave Jones

[cc:'d back to l-k where this belongs]

Quoted 4 lines · Peter L Jones

The mce.c entries are excluded by "#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE". For some reason, the entire subdirectory has been built but the processor-specific modules don't have any CONFIG_X86_MCE protection. This one's beyond my skill even to attempt to fix. I guess I'll turn on machine check exceptions...

Quoted 4 lines

Oops, it's broken if CONFIG_X86_MCE=n
Change arch/i386/kernel/cpu/Makefile line 16 to read
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_MCE) += mcheck/
and it should be ok..

Actually you need to patch a half dozen other places too. I'll cook up a patch later.

Dave

Signature · 1 line
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk