Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas
Hi,
Here's a simple patch to change sockets_in_use to make use of per-cpu areas.
I have couple of questions though...
1. Was this var made per-cpu just to avoid atomic_t or locking or are there real life workloads which cause too many sock_alloc and sock_releases to cause cacheline bouncing?
2. Is this var required? since we can just sum up all proto->stats.inuse and remove this var altogether? (This var is read only for /proc reporting)
Thanks,
Kiran
net/socket.c +6 -7
@@ -189,10 +189,7 @@* Statistics counters of the socket lists */ -static union { -int counter; -char __pad[SMP_CACHE_BYTES ]; -} sockets_in_use[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned = {{0}}; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sockets_in_use);/* * Support routines. Move socket addresses back and forth across the kernel/user
@@ -475,7 +472,8 @@ inode->i_uid = current->fsuid; inode->i_gid = current->fsgid; - sockets_in_use[smp_processor_id ()].counter++; +get_cpu_var (sockets_in_use)++; +put_cpu_var (sockets_in_use);return sock; }
@@ -511,7 +509,8 @@if (sock->fasync_list)printk (KERN_ERR "sock_release: fasync list not empty!\n" ); - sockets_in_use[smp_processor_id ()].counter--; +get_cpu_var (sockets_in_use)--; +put_cpu_var (sockets_in_use);if (!sock->file) {iput (SOCK_INODE (sock));return ;
@@ -1851,7 +1850,7 @@int counter =0 ;for (cpu =0 ; cpu <NR_CPUS ; cpu++) - counter += sockets_in_use[cpu].counter; + counter +=per_cpu (sockets_in_use, cpu);/* It can be negative, by the way. 8) */ if (counter <0 )
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:08:48 +0530
-static union {
- int counter;
- char __pad[SMP_CACHE_BYTES];
-} sockets_in_use[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned = {{0}};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sockets_in_use);You have to provide an explicit initializer for DEFINE_PER_CPU declarations or you break some platforms with older GCC's which otherwise won't put it into the proper section.
Quoted 3 lines · David S. Miller
You have to provide an explicit initializer for
DEFINE_PER_CPUdeclarations or you break some platforms with older GCC's which otherwise won't put it into the proper section.
I wonder if "some platforms with older GCC's" will ever have these issues resolved...
--cw
From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:00:48 -0800
Quoted 3 lines · David S. Miller
You have to provide an explicit initializer for
DEFINE_PER_CPUdeclarations or you break some platforms with older GCC's which otherwise won't put it into the proper section.
I wonder if "some platforms with older GCC's" will ever have these issues resolved...
I still don't have gcc-3.2.1 working properly on sparc64.
I hope to have it working soon, but this does mean that 2.6.x cannot deprecate it, whereas 2.7.x certainly can.
Quoted 11 lines · David S. Miller
...
-static union { - int counter; - char __pad[SMP_CACHE_BYTES]; -} sockets_in_use[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned = {{0}}; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sockets_in_use);You have to provide an explicit initializer for
DEFINE_PER_CPUdeclarations or you break some platforms with older GCC's which otherwise won't put it into the proper section.
Ok, here's the modified patch...
Thanks,
Kiran
net/socket.c +6 -7
@@ -189,10 +189,7 @@* Statistics counters of the socket lists */ -static union { -int counter; -char __pad[SMP_CACHE_BYTES ]; -} sockets_in_use[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned = {{0}}; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sockets_in_use) = 0;/* * Support routines. Move socket addresses back and forth across the kernel/user
@@ -475,7 +472,8 @@ inode->i_uid = current->fsuid; inode->i_gid = current->fsgid; - sockets_in_use[smp_processor_id ()].counter++; +get_cpu_var (sockets_in_use)++; +put_cpu_var (sockets_in_use);return sock; }
@@ -511,7 +509,8 @@if (sock->fasync_list)printk (KERN_ERR "sock_release: fasync list not empty!\n" ); - sockets_in_use[smp_processor_id ()].counter--; +get_cpu_var (sockets_in_use)--; +put_cpu_var (sockets_in_use);if (!sock->file) {iput (SOCK_INODE (sock));return ;
@@ -1851,7 +1850,7 @@int counter =0 ;for (cpu =0 ; cpu <NR_CPUS ; cpu++) - counter += sockets_in_use[cpu].counter; + counter +=per_cpu (sockets_in_use, cpu);/* It can be negative, by the way. 8) */ if (counter <0 )
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:18:52 +0530
Ok, here's the modified patch...
Ok I'll apply this when I get back from vacation in the new year.
Patch applied, thanks.