ipv4/ipv6: call tcp_timewait_kill in tcp_tw_deschedule
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ipv4/ipv6: call tcp_timewait_kill in tcp_tw_deschedule
Hi David,
As discussed in the past, please pull from:
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5
There is just this outstanding changeset in this tree.
Best Regards,
- Arnaldo
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
===================================================================
[email protected], 2003-05-14 01:26:18-03:00, [email protected]
o ipv4/ipv6: call tcp_timewait_kill in tcp_tw_deschedule
After all calls to tcp_tw_deschedule we had a call to tcp_timewait_kill, move it to the end of tcp_tw_deschedule and unexport tcp_timewait_kill, making it static.
include/net/tcp.h | 1 - net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 3 --- net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 5 ++--- net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 2 -- net/netsyms.c | 1 - 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
include/net/tcp.h +0 -1
@@ -222,7 +222,6 @@extern atomic_t tcp_orphan_count;extern int tcp_tw_count;extern void tcp_time_wait (struct sock *sk,int state,int timeo); -extern void tcp_timewait_kill (struct tcp_tw_bucket *tw);extern void tcp_tw_schedule (struct tcp_tw_bucket *tw,int timeo);extern void tcp_tw_deschedule (struct tcp_tw_bucket *tw);
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +0 -3
@@ -633,7 +633,6 @@ }else if (tw) {/* Silly. Should hash-dance instead... */ tcp_tw_deschedule (tw); -tcp_timewait_kill (tw);NET_INC_STATS_BH (TimeWaitRecycled);tcp_tw_put (tw);
@@ -737,7 +736,6 @@if (tw) {tcp_tw_deschedule (tw); -tcp_timewait_kill (tw);tcp_tw_put (tw); }
@@ -1853,7 +1851,6 @@ tcp_v4_iif(skb));if (sk2) {tcp_tw_deschedule ((struct tcp_tw_bucket *)sk); -tcp_timewait_kill ((struct tcp_tw_bucket *)sk);tcp_tw_put ((struct tcp_tw_bucket *)sk); sk = sk2; goto process;
net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c +2 -3
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@/* Must be called with locally disabled BHs. */ -void tcp_timewait_kill (struct tcp_tw_bucket *tw) +static void tcp_timewait_kill (struct tcp_tw_bucket *tw) {struct tcp_ehash_bucket *ehead;struct tcp_bind_hashbucket *bhead;
@@ -166,7 +166,6 @@if (!th->fin ||TCP_SKB_CB (skb)->end_seq != tw->rcv_nxt+1 ) { kill_with_rst:tcp_tw_deschedule (tw); -tcp_timewait_kill (tw);tcp_tw_put (tw);return TCP_TW_RST ; }
@@ -223,7 +222,6 @@if (sysctl_tcp_rfc1337 ==0 ) { kill:tcp_tw_deschedule (tw); -tcp_timewait_kill (tw);tcp_tw_put (tw);return TCP_TW_SUCCESS ; }
@@ -484,6 +482,7 @@del_timer (&tcp_tw_timer); }spin_unlock (&tw_death_lock); +tcp_timewait_kill (tw); }/* Short-time timewait calendar */
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c +0 -2
@@ -505,7 +505,6 @@/* Silly. Should hash-dance instead... */ local_bh_disable ();tcp_tw_deschedule (tw); -tcp_timewait_kill (tw);NET_INC_STATS_BH (TimeWaitRecycled);local_bh_enable ();
@@ -1698,7 +1697,6 @@ sk2 =tcp_v6_lookup_listener (&skb->nh.ipv6h->daddr,ntohs (th->dest),tcp_v6_iif (skb));if (sk2 !=NULL ) {tcp_tw_deschedule ((struct tcp_tw_bucket *)sk); -tcp_timewait_kill ((struct tcp_tw_bucket *)sk);tcp_tw_put ((struct tcp_tw_bucket *)sk); sk = sk2; goto process;
net/netsyms.c +0 -1
@@ -420,7 +420,6 @@EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_rcv_state_process);EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_timewait_state_process);EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_timewait_cachep); -EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_timewait_kill);EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_sendmsg);EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_v4_rebuild_header);EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcp_v4_send_check);
===================================================================
This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
1.1114
## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##
M'XL( &O&P3X ^V876^C.!2&K^-?86EN]BO$WT!6665F.MH=S4A;=377E6-, M<1MP!2:92OSX-63:I4F:)G0ODQ! -AQ>SGEXL?,.?JMT.1U)E6OP#OYE*S<= M*5MHY<Q*!LKFP:+T'5?6^HY)9G,]^?!E4F@W)@$'ON=2.I7!E2ZKZ0@']*G% M/=SKZ>CJTY_?OKZ_ F V@Q\S6=SH?[2#LQEPMES)95+-I<N6M@A<*8LJUZZ[ M9O-T:$,0(O[+<4@1%PT6B(6-P@G&DF&=(,(BP<!M9?+<%M7<%&DI$RV3P)8W MS\/X\S%#A N,&A2RB(,+B .,,8.(3A"?M#MX2L041V-$IPC!-BOS[6S 7SD< M(_ !_K^W\!$H:*&Y7[&)7XDI5'*YA$[=7SN3Z[4T[OK.^!93;!K7UXFN5*:3 M>JG]J7YYGSI=PO:L]M3*Z]L]$JXUS&0"Y8_P=O<*O_E0N5UI:%S7GVFHBP3:
M=$\TZ3OJ0G^_MZ5[(9*\,\5-&ZMRTAD5@"]0Q#P"E__Q ,8G?@! $H$_7JF MA[0%M7K(JT#UJQ#SL$$4H["1!"V$D*E&"Y*FBNZO^&ZD#4N,4!8W%(<,'R6F MK>NDS5*[LRTI;C"A(FZ8HMJWTX3AT.LZH&A/N+XN3 5GQ^IBCX'8MJZH88R) ML"&4+'B:1(M8*X%H>EC8=KR^,([BZ'5AIE#+.M%MWMM80?9,%HM\&!&))J6:
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
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 01:35:13 -0300
As discussed in the past, please pull from:
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5
There is just this outstanding changeset in this tree.
Looks fin to me, I just want to review this a little bit more and I'll probably pull this tomorrow.