Skip to contentSkip to conversation

O(1) scheduler starvation

DISCUSSION Ricardo Galli 2 participants 2 messages Jun 18, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines

Have you seen this email I just posted to lkml?

[PATCH] 2.5.72 O(1) interactivity bugfix

It may be affecting the scheduler in all sorts of ways.

I've applied the patch you posted in your web page for 2.4.21-ck1. It feels more reactive but has an annoying collateral effect, it seems to slow down to new processes forked from an interactive program.

I see it when selecting a PGP signed message in kmail, it takes up to two seconds to show the message body. The lag wasn't so noticeable before.

Regards,

Signature · 1 line
  ricardo galli       GPG id C8114D34
#1 lore raw

On Wednesday 18 June 2003 22:44, Ricardo Galli wrote:

Hi Ricardo,

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Have you seen this email I just posted to lkml? [PATCH] 2.5.72 O(1) interactivity bugfix
It may be affecting the scheduler in all sorts of ways.

I've applied the patch you posted in your web page for 2.4.21-ck1. It feels more reactive but has an annoying collateral effect, it seems to slow down to new processes forked from an interactive program.
I see it when selecting a PGP signed message in kmail, it takes up to two seconds to show the message body. The lag wasn't so noticeable before.

Robert already told so.

ciao, Marc