current bk has wrong version?
When I do a "bk pull" on the standard kernel, the result generates a version of 2.5.72 rather than 2.5.73. Is this a known issue? I don't remember seeing it mentioned on the list before.
Chris
Signature · 4 lines
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: [email protected]
Quoted 3 lines · Chris Friesen
When I do a "bk pull" on the standard kernel, the result generates a version of 2.5.72 rather than 2.5.73. Is this a known issue? I don't remember seeing it mentioned on the list before.
The tag is in there:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/tags?nav=index.html
Signature · 2 lines
--- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
Quoted 8 lines · Larry McVoy
Quoted 2 lines · Chris Friesen
When I do a "bk pull" on the standard kernel, the result generates a version of 2.5.72 rather than 2.5.73. Is this a known issue? I don't remember seeing it mentioned on the list before.
The tag is in there:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/tags?nav=index.htm
Interesting--I seem to be missing at least one change. The last update on that file in my tree is 1.411, and yet when I do a "bk pull" it doesn't pick up anything new. Have I found a bk bug?
One thing of note is that I ran "bk pull" late last night right after bkbits.net became available again. Is it possible I picked up a partial update or something and now bk doesn't realize that it needs to get more stuff?
I'm re-cloning a second tree from scratch to make sure that it gets picked up in that tree.
Anything you want me to run in the affected tree to narrow down the issue?
Chris
Signature · 4 lines
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: [email protected]