1/3 Serio: claim serio early
PATCH 1/1 1/3 Serio: claim serio early
Hi,
I think that serio_dev in serio_open should claim serio before calling "open" function as it has already been decided that (in case of success) this serio belongs to that serio_dev. Otherwise it might try to find an owner on its own, like i8042 module that calls serio_interrupt which in turn will do serio_rescan. From that point on 2 instances may start fighting over the same serio.
What you think about the patch below?
Dmitry
drivers/input/serio/serio.c +4 -2
@@ -204,9 +204,11 @@/* called from serio_dev->connect/disconnect methods under serio_sem */ int serio_open (struct serio *serio,struct serio_dev *dev) { -if (serio->open (serio)) -return -1 ; serio->dev = dev; +if (serio->open (serio)) { + serio->dev =NULL ; +return -1 ; + }return 0 ; }
Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Torokhov
Hi,
I think that
serio_devinserio_openshould claim serio before calling "open" function as it has already been decided that (in case of success) this serio belongs to thatserio_dev. Otherwise it might try to find an owner on its own, like i8042 module that callsserio_interruptwhich in turn will doserio_rescan. From that point on 2 instances may start fighting over the same serio.What you think about the patch below?
Agreed.
Quoted 26 lines
Dmitry
diff -urN --exclude-from=/usr/src/exclude
2.6.0-test4/drivers/input/serio/serio.clinux-2.6.0-test4/drivers/input/serio/serio.cdrivers/input/serio/serio.c +4
-3@@ -204,9 +204,11 @@/* called from serio_dev->connect/disconnect methods under serio_sem */ int serio_open (struct serio *serio,struct serio_dev *dev) { -if (serio->open (serio)) -return -1 ; serio->dev = dev; +if (serio->open (serio)) { + serio->dev =NULL ; +return -1 ; + }return 0 ; } -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 2 lines
Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR