2 different functions with same name are bad idea
Hi!
There's acpi_disable somewhere in the acpi interpreter (it disables interrupts, iirc). Thus blacklisting function needs better name.
Pavel
arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c renamed from linux/arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c +2 -2
@@ -506,7 +507,7 @@extern int acpi_disabled, acpi_force; -static __init __attribute__((unused))int acpi_disable (struct dmi_blacklist *d) +static __init __attribute__((unused))int disable_acpi (struct dmi_blacklist *d) {if (!acpi_force) {printk (KERN_NOTICE "%s detected: acpi off\n" ,d->ident);
@@ -880,7 +881,7 @@* Boxes that need ACPI disabled */ - { acpi_disable, "IBM Thinkpad", { + { disable_acpi, "IBM Thinkpad", {MATCH (DMI_BOARD_VENDOR ,"IBM" ),MATCH (DMI_BOARD_NAME ,"2629H1G" ), NO_MATCH, NO_MATCH }},
Signature · 9 lines
When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php