System hangs after echo value > /sys/block/dm-0/queue/nr_requests
If you echo a value (any value; for example the default 128) to /sys/block/dm-0/queue/nr_requests the shell you are in hangs. After about 5 seconds, the whole system hangs 100%.
The system responds to interrupts (ping / sysrq) but that's it. For the rest it's dead in the water.
This is with Linux 2.6.0 and the deadline IO scheduler.
There is no oops or panic. With sysrq I managed to get a backtrace of the process doing the echo:
bash R 00000001 16 657 1 656 (NOTLB)f6d45e60 00000082 c2432c80 00000001 00000003 00000000 c03ba4a0 00000000
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 f738b680 f738b714 c01484d4
f738b714 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 f738b680 00001000 00000000
Call Trace:
[<c01484d4>] vmtruncate+0x79/0x112
[<c016f0b2>] inode_setattr+0x106/0x17d
[<c016f29b>] notify_change+0x119/0x16a
[<c013b0a5>] unlock_page+0x15/0x57
[<c01482c2>] do_wp_page+0x2c7/0x2f2
[<c013ee4b>] buffered_rmqueue+0xc4/0x143
[<c013ef71>] __alloc_pages+0xa7/0x317
[<c01ff557>] queue_var_store+0x23/0x31
[<c01ff690>] queue_requests_store+0x11b/0x17d
[<c01ff751>] queue_attr_store+0x32/0x36
[<c0185a3a>] flush_write_buffer+0x3b/0x47
[<c0185aa0>] sysfs_write_file+0x5a/0x69
[<c0185a46>] sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x69
[<c0156300>] vfs_write+0xb0/0x119
[<c015640e>] sys_write+0x42/0x63
[<c010b20b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xbA "show regs" shows:
SysRq : Show Regs
Pid: 6, comm: events/0
EIP: 0060:[<c01197b2>] CPU: 0
EIP is at smp_call_function+0x130/0x15b
EFLAGS: 00000297 Not tainted
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000002
ESI: 00000001 EDI: 00000297 EBP: f7fda580 DS: 007b ES: 007b
CR0: 8005003b CR2: 400c6fe0 CR3: 36c1d000 CR4: 000006d0
Call Trace: [<c0113780>] mce_checkregs+0x0/0x92 [<c0113839>] do_mce_timer+0x27/0x2b [<c0113780>] mce_checkregs+0x0/0x92 [<c01319f5>] worker_thread+0x1be/0x283 [<c0113812>] do_mce_timer+0x0/0x2b [<c011f07d>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x12 [<c011f07d>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x12 [<c0131837>] worker_thread+0x0/0x283 [<c0109269>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
The sysrq reboot function doesn't work - it you use it, the kernel stops responding to sysrq requests as well.
Mike.
Signature · 1 line
When life hands you lemons, grab the salt and pass the tequila.
Quoted 4 lines · Miquel van Smoorenburg
If you echo a value (any value; for example the default 128) to
/sys/block/dm-0/queue/nr_requeststhe shell you are in hangs. After about 5 seconds, the whole system hangs 100%.
hm, nice. It does the same thing for /sys/block/md0/queue/nr-requests.
With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK enabled we go BUG in __wake_up():
Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.__wake_up (q=0xcf299e90, mode=3, nr_exclusive=1) at include/asm/spinlock.h:137
137 BUG();
(gdb) bt
#0 __wake_up (q=0xcf299e90, mode=3, nr_exclusive=1) at include/asm/spinlock.h:137
#1 0xc02cc847 in queue_requests_store (q=0xcf299df8, page=0xe <Address 0xe out of bounds>, count=14)
at drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c:2843
#2 0xc02cc907 in queue_attr_store (kobj=0xcf299f68, attr=0xe, page=0xe <Address 0xe out of bounds>,
length=14) at drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c:2892
#3 0xc01aa84f in flush_write_buffer (file=0xe, buffer=0xc0456100, count=14) at fs/sysfs/file.c:205
#4 0xc01aa8ac in sysfs_write_file (file=0xc0493550, buf=0xe <Address 0xe out of bounds>, count=2,
ppos=0xc851cf84) at fs/sysfs/file.c:233
#5 0xc016f458 in vfs_write (file=0xc0493550, buf=0x80b2d00 "128\n", count=4, pos=0xc851cf84)
at fs/read_write.c:257#6 0xc016f55e in sys_write (fd=14, buf=0xe <Address 0xe out of bounds>, count=14) at fs/read_write.c:293
Where queue_requests_store() does wake_up(&rl->wait[READ]);
It looks like nobody has called blk_init_queue() for this queue and the waitqueue head is uninitialised.
No md was in use on this machine: it was simply enabled in kernel config.
Quoted 5 lines · Andrew Morton
Where
queue_requests_store()doeswake_up(&rl->wait[READ]);It looks like nobody has called
blk_init_queue()for this queue and the waitqueue head is uninitialised.
DM, MD, rd and loop use blk_alloc_queue and blk_queue_make_request to initialize their queue, because they only use the make_request_fn. The attached patch prevents the queue from being registered if only blk_alloc_queue was called.
Mike Christie
drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c +2 -2
@@ -2902,7 +2902,7 @@ int blk_register_queue(struct gendisk *drequest_queue_t *q = disk->queue; -if (!q) +if (!q || !q->request_fn)return -ENXIO ; q->kobj.parent =kobject_get (&disk->kobj);
@@ -2929,7 +2929,7 @@ void blk_unregister_queue(struct gendisk {request_queue_t *q = disk->queue; -if (q) { +if (q && q->request_fn) {elv_unregister_queue (q);kobject_unregister (&q->kobj);
Quoted 4 lines · Mike Christie
Quoted 2 lines · Andrew Morton
Where
queue_requests_store()doeswake_up(&rl->wait[READ]);
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
It looks like nobody has called
blk_init_queue()for this queue and the waitqueue head is uninitialised.DM, MD, rd and loop use
blk_alloc_queueandblk_queue_make_requestto initialize their queue, because they only use themake_request_fn. The attached patch prevents the queue from being registered if onlyblk_alloc_queuewas called.
I'm fine with that patch since we don't have any attributes in there that apply to just remappers.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe