Unhork ymfpci broken by hasty janitors
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:49:31 +0000 Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]> wrote:
| ChangeSet 1.1391, 2004/01/10 15:49:31-02:00, [email protected] | | [PATCH] Unhork ymfpci broken by hasty janitors | | - Do not use schedule_timeout with spinlocks taken. | - Restore missing kfree's.
some janitors maybe. but "hasty janitors" != "kernel-janitors project".
BK shows previous changes here by "alan", "patch", and "torvalds", so they must have been made by "patch". 8:)
--
~Randy
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:29:12 -0800 "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]> wrote:
| On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:49:31 +0000 Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]> wrote: | | | ChangeSet 1.1391, 2004/01/10 15:49:31-02:00, [email protected] | | | | [PATCH] Unhork ymfpci broken by hasty janitors | | | | - Do not use schedule_timeout with spinlocks taken. | | - Restore missing kfree's. | | some janitors maybe. but "hasty janitors" != "kernel-janitors project". | | BK shows previous changes here by "alan", "patch", and "torvalds", | so they must have been made by "patch". 8:)
Sorry, I meant to also say:
Yes, we (the KJ project) [or I] do make mistakes, but we haven't been making patches to 2.4.x kernels.
--
~Randy