Hardware reports non-fatal error
I also have been getting apparently false MCEs since 2.5.xx I even had kernel panics in early 2.5 with MCE enabled. Now in 2.6.0-xx and in 2.6.1 I just get them from time to time but none fatal. most of the time in CPU 0
request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- char-major-6-0. error = 256
MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU 0. Bank 0: e606200000000833request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe --
the box is dual athlon mp with AMD 760MP chipset.
nebula:/home/piotr# ./parsemce b 1 -a 0 -e e606200000000833 Status: (e606200000000833) Error IP valid Restart IP valid. nebula:/home/piotr#
Signature · 4 lines
Pedro Larroy Tovar | piotr%member.fsf.org Software patents are a threat to innovation in Europe please check: http://www.eurolinux.org/
Quoted 5 lines · Pedro Larroy
I also have been getting apparently false MCEs since 2.5.xx I even had kernel panics in early 2.5 with MCE enabled. Now in 2.6.0-xx and in 2.6.1 I just get them from time to time but none fatal. most of the time in CPU 0
I get them too, so I applied this patch.
- g.
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/non-fatal.c renamed from arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/non-fatal.c.orig +15 -1
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@static struct timer_list mce_timer;static int timerset; +static int startbank;#define MCE_RATE 15*HZ/* timer rate is 15s */
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@int i;preempt_disable (); -for (i=0 ; i<nr_mce_banks; i++) { +for (i=startbank; i<nr_mce_banks; i++) {rdmsr (MSR_IA32_MC0_STATUS +i*4 , low, high);if (high & (1 <<31 )) {
@@ -68,6 +69,19 @@static int __init init_nonfatal_mce_checker (void ) { +/* +Certain Athlons would cause spurious MCE non-fatal +exception check to be reported, if we poke at bank 0. +Avoid this if the running machine is an Athlon. + +-- geoff. +*/ +if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==X86_VENDOR_AMD && + boot_cpu_data.x86 ==6 ) + startbank =1 ; +else + startbank =0 ; +if (timerset ==0 ) {/* Set the timer to check for non-fatal errors every MCE_RATE seconds */
Quoted 2 lines · On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:23:38PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
I get them too, so I applied this patch.
gah, that still didn't get applied?
Dave
Signature · 1 line
Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk