show "Fusion MPT device support" menu only if BLK_DEV_SD
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 show "Fusion MPT device support" menu only if BLK_DEV_SD
With BLK_DEV_SD=n, I see a "Fusion MPT device support" menu I can't enter.
The simple patch below removes the "Fusion MPT device support" menu if BLK_DEV_SD=n.
Please apply
Adrian
drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig renamed from drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig.old +1 -1
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ menu "Fusion MPT device support" + depends on BLK_DEV_SD config FUSION tristate "Fusion MPT (base + ScsiHost) drivers" - depends on BLK_DEV_SD ---help--- LSI Logic Fusion(TM) Message Passing Technology (MPT) device support provides high performance SCSI host initiator, and LAN [1] interface
Quoted 5 lines · Adrian Bunk
With BLK_DEV_SD=n, I see a "Fusion MPT device support" menu I can't enter.
The simple patch below removes the "Fusion MPT device support" menu if BLK_DEV_SD=n.
I'd rather see an explanation from LSI why a scsi LLDD depens on a uper driver. This can't be right.
Quoted 10 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 5 lines · Adrian Bunk
With BLK_DEV_SD=n, I see a "Fusion MPT device support" menu I can't enter.
The simple patch below removes the "Fusion MPT device support" menu if BLK_DEV_SD=n.
I'd rather see an explanation from LSI why a scsi LLDD depens on a uper driver. This can't be right.
There's a hint in the config help:
[2] In order enable capability to boot the linux kernel natively from a Fusion MPT target device, you MUST answer Y here! (currently requires CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD)
But a kernel built with BLK_DEV_SD=n, FUSION=y builds and links OK.
Quoted 3 lines · Andrew Morton
[2] In order enable capability to boot the linux kernel natively from a Fusion MPT target device, you MUST answer Y here! (currently requires
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD)
Well, that's true for any LLDD.
Quoted 7 lines · Andrew Morton
There's a hint in the config help:
[2] In order enable capability to boot the linux kernel natively from a Fusion MPT target device, you MUST answer Y here! (currently requires
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD)But a kernel built with BLK_DEV_SD=n, FUSION=y builds and links OK.
This is one of the patches I have in my tree. Andrew, shall I start feeding all my Kconfig cleanups through you rather than through kernel-janitors?
Signature · 6 lines
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
Quoted 4 lines · Matthew Wilcox
Andrew, shall I start
feeding all myKconfigcleanups through you rather than through kernel-janitors?
Doesn't Randy have some system going there?
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:11:07 -0800 Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
| Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: | > | > Andrew, shall I start | > feeding all my Kconfig cleanups through you rather than through | > kernel-janitors? | | Doesn't Randy have some system going there?
Yes, some system, but I think that Matthew should go ahead and send this one to you.
--
~Randy