Skip to contentSkip to conversation

bad: scheduling while atomic in nfs with 2.6.3

DISCUSSION Mike Fedyk 3 participants 3 messages Mar 3, 2004

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Mike Fedyk

author
#0 lore raw

I'm running 2.6.3-zonebal-lofft-slabfaz

That's with the nfsd loff_t patch and two VM patches from -mm.

More info available upon request.

Mike

loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
ISOFS: changing to secondary root
ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
ISOFS: changing to secondary root
Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:66 in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0

Call Trace:
 [<c012258d>] __might_sleep+0x9d/0xe0
 [<c01651d8>] deactivate_super+0x58/0x100
 [<f89e9fba>] svc_export_put+0x7a/0x80 [nfsd]
 [<f898167c>] cache_clean+0x18c/0x2e0 [sunrpc]
 [<f89817d9>] do_cache_clean+0x9/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0136128>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x260
 [<f89817d0>] do_cache_clean+0x0/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0109e16>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x20
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0135f70>] worker_thread+0x0/0x260
 [<c0107d95>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10

bad: scheduling while atomic!

Call Trace:
 [<c01206eb>] schedule+0x6fb/0x710
 [<c014a06c>] __pagevec_release+0x1c/0x30
 [<c014a7d4>] truncate_inode_pages+0xc4/0x2a0
 [<c010cb7b>] do_IRQ+0x16b/0x1a0
 [<c0179d00>] dispose_list+0xc0/0xd0
 [<c0179e82>] invalidate_inodes+0xb2/0xf0
 [<c016549b>] generic_shutdown_super+0x9b/0x200
 [<c0166454>] kill_block_super+0x14/0x30
 [<c01651f7>] deactivate_super+0x77/0x100
 [<f89e9fba>] svc_export_put+0x7a/0x80 [nfsd]
 [<f898167c>] cache_clean+0x18c/0x2e0 [sunrpc]
 [<f89817d9>] do_cache_clean+0x9/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0136128>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x260
 [<f89817d0>] do_cache_clean+0x0/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0109e16>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x20
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0135f70>] worker_thread+0x0/0x260
 [<c0107d95>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10

bad: scheduling while atomic!

Call Trace:
 [<c01206eb>] schedule+0x6fb/0x710
 [<c0163fae>] free_buffer_head+0x3e/0x70
 [<c013fe48>] __remove_from_page_cache+0x18/0x80
 [<c014a06c>] __pagevec_release+0x1c/0x30
 [<c014aa3f>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0x8f/0xf0
 [<c0119a95>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xe5/0x160
 [<c0161c9d>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x2d/0x60
 [<c014aab0>] invalidate_inode_pages+0x10/0x20
 [<c016690f>] kill_bdev+0xf/0x30
 [<c0167c9c>] blkdev_put+0x1fc/0x220
 [<c0166466>] kill_block_super+0x26/0x30
 [<c01651f7>] deactivate_super+0x77/0x100
 [<f89e9fba>] svc_export_put+0x7a/0x80 [nfsd]
 [<f898167c>] cache_clean+0x18c/0x2e0 [sunrpc]
 [<f89817d9>] do_cache_clean+0x9/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0136128>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x260
 [<f89817d0>] do_cache_clean+0x0/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0109e16>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x20
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0135f70>] worker_thread+0x0/0x260
 [<c0107d95>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Mike Fedyk

I'm running 2.6.3-zonebal-lofft-slabfaz

Call Trace:
  [<c012258d>] __might_sleep+0x9d/0xe0
  [<c01651d8>] deactivate_super+0x58/0x100
  [<f89e9fba>] svc_export_put+0x7a/0x80 [nfsd]

The bad call path goes something like this:
svc_export_put() -> mntput() -> __mntput() -> deactivate_super() -> down_write() -> might_sleep()

I don't have a fix. Neil Brown might. I've CC'd him.

regards,
dan carpenter

#2 lore raw
In reply to Mike Fedyk
Quoted 4 lines · Mike Fedyk

I'm running 2.6.3-zonebal-lofft-slabfaz

That's with the nfsd loff_t patch and two VM patches from -mm.

Quoted 13 lines
Call Trace:
 [<c012258d>] __might_sleep+0x9d/0xe0
 [<c01651d8>] deactivate_super+0x58/0x100
 [<f89e9fba>] svc_export_put+0x7a/0x80 [nfsd]
 [<f898167c>] cache_clean+0x18c/0x2e0 [sunrpc]
 [<f89817d9>] do_cache_clean+0x9/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0136128>] worker_thread+0x1b8/0x260
 [<f89817d0>] do_cache_clean+0x0/0x50 [sunrpc]
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0109e16>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x20
 [<c0120750>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c0135f70>] worker_thread+0x0/0x260
 [<c0107d95>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10

This is fixed in 2.6.4-rc1, with the following patch.

--Bruce Fields

We currently call cache_put, which can schedule(), under a spin_lock. This patch moves that call outside the spinlock.

(From neilb)

 net/sunrpc/cache.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
net/sunrpc/cache.c renamed from net/sunrpc/cache.c~neil_cache_clean_fix +8 -5
diff -puN net/sunrpc/cache.c~neil_cache_clean_fix net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ int cache_clean(void)
 	
 	if (current_detail && current_index < current_detail->hash_size) {
 		struct cache_head *ch, **cp;
+		struct cache_detail *d;
 		
 		write_lock(&current_detail->hash_lock);
 
@@ -354,12 +355,14 @@ int cache_clean(void)
 			rv = 1;
 		}
 		write_unlock(&current_detail->hash_lock);
-		if (ch)
-			current_detail->cache_put(ch, current_detail);
-		else
+		d = current_detail;
+		if (!ch)
 			current_index ++;
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&cache_list_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&cache_list_lock);
+		if (ch)
+			d->cache_put(ch, d);
+	} else
+		spin_unlock(&cache_list_lock);
 
 	return rv;
 }

_