atyfb (2.6): Memory type correction
PATCH 1/1 atyfb (2.6): Memory type correction
This patch changes the memory type message to match reality. This agrees with both my hardware and the Mobility register specs.
Signature · 3 lines
Ville Syrjälä [email protected] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
drivers/video/aty/atyfb_base.c renamed from drivers/video/aty/atyfb_base.c.orig +4 -4
@@ -457,9 +457,9 @@#endif /* CONFIG_FB_ATY_GX */ #ifdef CONFIG_FB_ATY_CT static char ram_edo[]__initdata ="EDO" ; -static char ram_sdram[]__initdata ="SDRAM" ; -static char ram_sgram[]__initdata ="SGRAM" ; -static char ram_wram[]__initdata ="WRAM" ; +static char ram_sdram[]__initdata ="SDRAM (1:1)" ; +static char ram_sgram[]__initdata ="SGRAM (1:1)" ; +static char ram_sdram32[]__initdata ="SDRAM (2:1) (32-bit)" ;static char ram_off[]__initdata ="OFF" ;#endif /* CONFIG_FB_ATY_CT */
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@#ifdef CONFIG_FB_ATY_CT static char *aty_ct_ram[8 ]__initdata = { ram_off, ram_dram, ram_edo, ram_edo, - ram_sdram, ram_sgram, ram_wram, ram_resv + ram_sdram, ram_sgram, ram_sdram32, ram_resv };#endif /* CONFIG_FB_ATY_CT */
Quoted 2 lines · On Fri, 7 May 2004, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrjälä wrote:
This patch changes the memory type message to match reality. This agrees with both my hardware and the Mobility register specs.
I took the values from the RAGE II+ manual. So ATI recycled the WRAM value for Mobility? Unless they never actually made boards with WRAM.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
Quoted 6 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 2 lines · On Fri, 7 May 2004, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrjälä wrote:
This patch changes the memory type message to match reality. This agrees with both my hardware and the Mobility register specs.
I took the values from the RAGE II+ manual. So ATI recycled the WRAM value for Mobility? Unless they never actually made boards with WRAM.
My Rage Pro manual lists WRAM in CONFIG_STAT2.CFG_MEM_TYPEb. And that's the only place where WRAM in mentioned as a valid memory type in my manuals. Also the values of CFG_MEM_TYPEb look like the xor of CONFIG_STAT0.CFG_MEM_TYPE except that WRAM is CFG_MEM_TYPEb=001 and CFG_MEM_TYPE=110 is listed as a reserved value.
Signature · 10 lines
Ville Syrjälä [email protected] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3