Skip to contentSkip to conversation

pom-ng patchlet to add 'goto' type jumps

PATCH In review Brad Fisher 4 participants 5 messages May 12, 2004 – May 13, 2004 netfilter

lore
Share & tools
lore

Brad Fisher

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pom-ng patchlet to add 'goto' type jumps

Attached is a tar file containing a pom-ng version of a patch written by

Henrik Nordstrom to add a 'goto' style jump. It should work for 2.4 kernels fine.
Haven't tested/ported to 2.6, but will hopefully get a chance soon.

Simply extract the file at the pom-ng base dir and it should create the goto/ dir structure.

Please let me know if it is/is'nt acceptable for pom inclusion. I'd like to see it included someday...

-Brad Fisher

#1 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Brad Fisher

Attached is a tar file containing a pom-ng version of a patch written by Henrik Nordstrom to add a 'goto' style jump. It should work for 2.4 kernels fine.
Haven't tested/ported to 2.6, but will hopefully get a chance soon.

Thanks for keeping track of and maitaining this patch. I had forgot about it.

Quoted 2 lines

Please let me know if it is/is'nt acceptable for pom inclusion. I'd like to see it included someday...

I support this even if I am not using the patch and probably never will..

Regards
Henrik

#2 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Henrik Nordstrom
Quoted 4 lines · Brad Fisher

Please let me know if it is/is'nt acceptable for pom inclusion. I'd like to see it included someday...

I support this even if I am not using the patch and probably never will..

Thanks, I've added it to CVS.

Regards
Patrick

author
#3 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Patrick McHardy
Quoted 8 lines · Henrik Nordstrom
Quoted 4 lines · Brad Fisher

Please let me know if it is/is'nt acceptable for pom inclusion. I'd like to see it included someday...

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

I support this even if I am not using the patch and probably never will..

Thanks, I've added it to CVS.

Regards
Patrick

Thanks for adding it! I really appreciate it.

-Brad

#4 lore raw
In reply to Henrik Nordstrom
Quoted 4 lines · Henrik Nordstrom
Quoted 2 lines

Please let me know if it is/is'nt acceptable for pom inclusion. I'd like to see it included someday...

I support this even if I am not using the patch and probably never will..

I'm really happy too, because I haven't found a way to write efficient rules referencing multiple source, dest and service without something like this. It will improve rules efficiency a lot in certain circumstances.

Regards,
Willy