ext3 s_dirt for r/w
PATCH 1/1 ext3 s_dirt for r/w
Andrew,
Here is a patch setting s_dirt for read-write filesystems in ext3_init
(doing it in create_journal seems troublesome IMHO).
PS: untested
Regards,
FabF
fs/super.c +4 -2
@@ -1569,7 +1569,10 @@ ext3_count_free_inodes(sb));percpu_counter_mod (&sbi->s_dirs_counter,ext3_count_dirs (sb)); - +if (!(sb->s_flags &MS_RDONLY )) { +mark_buffer_dirty (sbi->s_sbh); + sb->s_dirt =1 ; + }return 0 ; failed_mount3:
@@ -1841,7 +1844,6 @@EXT3_SET_COMPAT_FEATURE (sb,EXT3_FEATURE_COMPAT_HAS_JOURNAL ); es->s_journal_inum =cpu_to_le32 (journal_inum); - sb->s_dirt =1 ;/* Make sure we flush the recovery flag to disk. */ ext3_commit_super (sb, es,1 );
Quoted 3 lines · FabF
Here is a patch setting
s_dirtfor read-write filesystems inext3_init
(doing it increate_journalseems troublesome IMHO).
Why?
Quoted 1 line
PS: untested
Please don't send untested patches.
Quoted 3 lines
diff -Naur
orig/fs/super.cedited/fs/super.c
---orig/fs/super.c2004-06-16 07:20:03.000000000 +0200
+++edited/fs/super.c2004-06-19 19:58:19.895637880 +0200
fs/super.c does not contain ext3 code.
Quoted 6 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 3 lines · FabF
Here is a patch setting
s_dirtfor read-write filesystems inext3_init
(doing it increate_journalseems troublesome IMHO).Why?
ext3_create_journal is called with journal_inum parser option set which means unjournaled r/w ext3 fs are s_dirt 0.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
PS: untested
Please don't send untested patches.
Ok, tested.No problem here.
Quoted 9 lines · FabF
Quoted 6 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 3 lines · FabF
Here is a patch setting
s_dirtfor read-write filesystems inext3_init
(doing it increate_journalseems troublesome IMHO).Why?
ext3_create_journalis called withjournal_inumparser option set which means unjournaled r/w ext3 fs ares_dirt0.
Oops ... ^has_journal is only ext2 readable so there's no problem at that point ...Anyway, valid ext3 partition can be initialized with load_journal or create_journal so s_dirt problem remains IMHO...
Regards,
FabF