Skip to contentSkip to conversation

using gcc built-ins for bitops?

DISCUSSION Pascal Schmidt 2 participants 3 messages Jun 24, 2004 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:20:07 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel:

Review

Quoted 3 lines
(quoted diff) +3 -0
+#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4
+#define HAVE_BUILTIN_CTZL
+#endif

Eh, what value does __GNUC_MINOR__ have for, say, gcc-2.95.x?

Signature · 2 lines
Ciao,
Pascal
#2 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Pascal Schmidt

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:20:07 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel:

Review

Quoted 3 lines
(quoted diff) +3 -0
+#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4
+#define HAVE_BUILTIN_CTZL
+#endif

Eh, what value does __GNUC_MINOR__ have for, say, gcc-2.95.x?

gcc 2.x.y do not use compiler-gcc3.h but compiler-gcc2.h instead so that is irrelevant ;)

#3 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Arjan van de Ven
Quoted 1 line

Eh, what value does __GNUC_MINOR__ have for, say, gcc-2.95.x?

gcc 2.x.y do not use compiler-gcc3.h but compiler-gcc2.h instead so that is irrelevant ;)

Ah. Sorry for the noise.

Signature · 2 lines
Ciao,
Pascal