: Move hash masking to call sites
Subsystems (3)
David S. Miller
maintainerPATCH 2/6 : Move hash masking to call sites
Another step towards moving all hashing details
into net/core/neighbour.c
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. #
# ChangeSet
# 2004/09/23 15:20:38-07:00 [email protected]
# [NET]: Apply NEIGH_HASHMASK at tbl->hash() caller.
#
# Now there is no reason for any neigh implementation
# to know the value of {P,}NEIGH_HASHMASK
#
# Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
#
# net/ipv6/ndisc.c # 2004/09/23 15:20:09-07:00 [email protected] +1 -1 # [NET]: Apply NEIGH_HASHMASK at tbl->hash() caller. # # Now there is no reason for any neigh implementation # to know the value of {P,}NEIGH_HASHMASK # # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> # # net/ipv4/arp.c # 2004/09/23 15:20:09-07:00 [email protected] +1 -1 # [NET]: Apply NEIGH_HASHMASK at tbl->hash() caller. # # Now there is no reason for any neigh implementation # to know the value of {P,}NEIGH_HASHMASK # # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> # # net/decnet/dn_neigh.c # 2004/09/23 15:20:09-07:00 [email protected] +1 -1 # [NET]: Apply NEIGH_HASHMASK at tbl->hash() caller. # # Now there is no reason for any neigh implementation # to know the value of {P,}NEIGH_HASHMASK # # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> # # net/core/neighbour.c # 2004/09/23 15:20:09-07:00 [email protected] +2 -2 # [NET]: Apply NEIGH_HASHMASK at tbl->hash() caller. # # Now there is no reason for any neigh implementation # to know the value of {P,}NEIGH_HASHMASK # # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> # # net/atm/clip.c # 2004/09/23 15:20:09-07:00 [email protected] +1 -1 # [NET]: Apply NEIGH_HASHMASK at tbl->hash() caller. # # Now there is no reason for any neigh implementation # to know the value of {P,}NEIGH_HASHMASK # # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> # diff -Nru a/net/atm/clip.c b/net/atm/clip.c --- a/net/atm/clip.c 2004-09-23 22:26:08 -07:00 +++ b/net/atm/clip.c 2004-09-23 22:26:08 -07:00 @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ hash_val ^= (hash_val>>16); hash_val ^= hash_val>>8; hash_val ^= hash_val>>3; - hash_val = (hash_val^dev->ifindex)&NEIGH_HASHMASK; + hash_val = (hash_val^dev->ifindex);
return hash_val;
}
net/core/neighbour.c +2 -2
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ {struct neighbour *n;int key_len = tbl->key_len; -u32 hash_val = tbl->hash (pkey, dev); +u32 hash_val = tbl->hash (pkey, dev) &NEIGH_HASHMASK ;read_lock_bh (&tbl->lock);for (n = tbl->hash_buckets[hash_val]; n; n = n->next) {
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ n->confirmed = jiffies - (n->parms->base_reachable_time <<1 ); - hash_val = tbl->hash (pkey, dev); + hash_val = tbl->hash (pkey, dev) &NEIGH_HASHMASK ;write_lock_bh (&tbl->lock);if (n->parms->dead) {
net/decnet/dn_neigh.c +1 -1
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ hash_val ^= (hash_val >>10 ); hash_val ^= (hash_val >>3 ); -return hash_val &NEIGH_HASHMASK ; +return hash_val; }static int dn_neigh_construct (struct neighbour *neigh)
net/ipv4/arp.c +1 -1
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ hash_val ^= (hash_val>>16 ); hash_val ^= hash_val>>8 ; hash_val ^= hash_val>>3 ; - hash_val = (hash_val^dev->ifindex)&NEIGH_HASHMASK ; + hash_val = (hash_val^dev->ifindex);return hash_val; }
net/ipv6/ndisc.c +1 -1
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ hash_val ^= (hash_val>>16 ); hash_val ^= hash_val>>8 ; hash_val ^= hash_val>>3 ; - hash_val = (hash_val^dev->ifindex)&NEIGH_HASHMASK ; + hash_val = (hash_val^dev->ifindex);return hash_val; }