Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ptrace fix, x11 fb update, minor stuff.

PATCH In review Gerd Knorr 2 participants 4 messages Oct 22, 2004 User-mode Linux (UML)

lore
Share & tools
lore

Gerd Knorr

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ptrace fix, x11 fb update, minor stuff.

Hi,

Just uploaded a updated batch of uml patches to
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/2.6.9/

Changes from -rc2 patchset:

* Dropped lots of patches because they are merged mainline now. Nice work guys!
* uml-ptrace: new, fixes the ptrace issue (skas-hangs-on-exit).
* uml-x11-fb: updated, should be fully functional now, including mmap support.
* other patches: some rediffs, no major stuff.

X11 doesn't run yet, the X-Server wants IOPL access for some obscure reason, it shouldn't need that when running on top of a framebuffer device. Anyone has an idea on that?

Gerd

Signature · 12 lines
return -ENOSIG;


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Gerd Knorr

* uml-x11-fb: updated, should be fully functional now, including mmap support.

Nice! I guess I should give it a try again :-)

Quoted 5 lines

* other patches: some rediffs, no major stuff.

X11 doesn't run yet, the X-Server wants IOPL access for some obscure reason, it shouldn't need that when running on top of a framebuffer device. Anyone has an idea on that?

Ugh, that's probably a hardcoded dependency on __i386__ somewhere...

Try the good old XF86_FBDev from XFree86 3.x? :-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 3 lines

X11 doesn't run yet, the X-Server wants IOPL access for some obscure reason, it shouldn't need that when running on top of a framebuffer device. Anyone has an idea on that?

Ugh, that's probably a hardcoded dependency on __i386__ somewhere...

The google hits I had on that suggest that as well :-/

Quoted 1 line

Try the good old XF86_FBDev from XFree86 3.x? :-)

I would, but don't have a copy any more. Ha, that was fun, first days of vesafb, my good old machine being busy for many hours building xfree86, and the X-Servers name was XF68_FBDev ;)

Gerd

Signature · 12 lines
return -ENOSIG;


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
#3 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Gerd Knorr
Quoted 5 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 3 lines

X11 doesn't run yet, the X-Server wants IOPL access for some obscure reason, it shouldn't need that when running on top of a framebuffer device. Anyone has an idea on that?

Ugh, that's probably a hardcoded dependency on __i386__ somewhere...

Quoted 7 lines

The google hits I had on that suggest that as well :-/

Quoted 1 line

Try the good old XF86_FBDev from XFree86 3.x? :-)

I would, but don't have a copy any more. Ha, that was fun, first days of vesafb, my good old machine being busy for many hours building xfree86, and the X-Servers name was XF68_FBDev ;)

Debian still has it: pool/main/x/xfree86v3/xserver-fbdev_3.3.6-44_i386.deb

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel