remove NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 remove NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL
CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL is entirely unused now, and superceded by NAPI in practice, so remove the dead code
Signed-off-by Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
include/linux/netdevice.h +0 -2
@@ -930,8 +930,6 @@ extern void netdev_state_change(struct/* Load a device via the kmod */ extern void dev_load (const char *name);extern void dev_mcast_init (void ); -extern int netdev_register_fc (struct net_device *dev,void (*stimul)(struct net_device *dev)); -extern void netdev_unregister_fc (int bit);extern int netdev_max_backlog;extern int weight_p;extern unsigned long netdev_fc_xoff;
net/Kconfig +0 -18
@@ -564,24 +564,6 @@ config WAN_ROUTER If unsure, say N. -config NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL - bool "Forwarding between high speed interfaces" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL - ---help--- - This option enables NIC (Network Interface Card) hardware throttling - during periods of extreme congestion. At the moment only a couple - of device drivers support it (really only one -- tulip, a modified - 8390 driver can be found at - <ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/net/ip-routing/fastroute/fastroute-8390.tar.gz>). - - Really, this option is applicable to any machine attached to a fast - enough network, and even a 10 Mb NIC is able to kill a not very slow - box, such as a 120MHz Pentium. - - However, do not say Y here if you did not experience any serious - problems. - - menu "QoS and/or fair queueing" config NET_SCHED
net/core/dev.c +2 -91
131 lines not on this page · raw message
Quoted 2 lines · Arjan van de Ven
CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROLis entirely unused now, and superceded by NAPI in practice, so remove the dead code
Ok with me. Jamal?
Jeff
nuke it.
I only know of one user of it in 2.4.x. If possible leave 2.4.x alone.
cheers,
jamal
Quoted 10 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 2 lines · Arjan van de Ven
CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROLis entirely unused now, and superceded by NAPI in practice, so remove the dead codeOk with me. Jamal?
Jeff
Quoted 2 lines · jamal
nuke it.
I only know of one user of it in 2.4.x. If possible leave 2.4.x alone.
ok, will apply, thanks.
Jeff