uninline __sigqueue_alloc (fwd)

The patch forwarded below still applies against 2.6.10-rc1-mm2.

Was there any specific reason why it wasn't applied?

----- Forwarded message from Chris Wright <[email protected]> -----

Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:35:51 -0700
From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] uninline __sigqueue_alloc

Christoph suggests letting the compiler choose. No real compelling reason to inline anyhow. I had some vmlinux size numbers suggesting inline was better, but re-running them on newer kernel is giving different results, favoring uninline. Best let compiler choose. Un-inline __sigqueue_alloc.

===== kernel/signal.c 1.140 vs edited =====

@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
 	return sig;
 }
 
-static inline struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc(struct task_struct *t, int flags)
+static struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc(struct task_struct *t, int flags)
 {
 	struct sigqueue *q = NULL;
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

----- End forwarded message -----