: Fix for sparc64 SMP boot failures
PATCH 1/1 : Fix for sparc64 SMP boot failures
This bug has been around for quite some time, is present in both 2.4.x and 2.6.x, and only triggers sporadically.
It depends upon the size of the kernel image and how the BSS section is layed out. Specifically both of the following conditions must hold to hit the bug:
1) The kernel must be > 4MB in size. You can check this via looking at System.map for the kernel image and checking if the final symbol "_end" is at an address >= 0x800000
2) The object "p1275buf" must cross a PAGE_SIZE (8K) boundary.
If this is true, secondary cpus will not boot up and instead will hang in the kernel TLB miss handler.
The attached patches for 2.4.x and 2.6.x fix the problem and I'll be pushing these upstream right after this email goes out.
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. #
# ChangeSet
# 2004/12/03 20:43:03-08:00 [email protected]
# [SPARC64]: Fix SMP cpu bringup bug when bigkernel.
#
# We have to load the bigkernel second TLB entry on # secondary processors before we move over the use # the kernel trap table. Otherwise we can take a # TLB miss somewhere in the post-4MB area and the # TLB handler is not prepared to service that. # # The case that usually occurs is the prom_set_trap_table # call made by trampoline.S, since p1275buf usually sits # very near the end of the kernel image. It worked by # luck most of the time as long as p1275buf sits within # a single page since earlier code running in trampoline.S # forced that TLB entry to be loaded by the OBP TLB miss # handler.
#
# This was not fun to figure out.
#
# Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
#
# arch/sparc64/kernel/trampoline.S
# 2004/12/03 20:39:23-08:00 [email protected] +84 -1
# [SPARC64]: Fix SMP cpu bringup bug when bigkernel.
#
# arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c # 2004/12/03 20:39:23-08:00 [email protected] +0 -9 # [SPARC64]: Fix SMP cpu bringup bug when bigkernel. # diff -Nru a/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c --- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c 2004-12-03 20:45:30 -08:00 +++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c 2004-12-03 20:45:30 -08:00 @@ -137,15 +137,6 @@ void __init smp_callin(void) { int cpuid = hard_smp_processor_id(); - extern int bigkernel; - extern unsigned long kern_locked_tte_data; - - if (bigkernel) { - prom_dtlb_load(sparc64_highest_locked_tlbent()-1, - kern_locked_tte_data + 0x400000, KERNBASE + 0x400000); - prom_itlb_load(sparc64_highest_locked_tlbent()-1, - kern_locked_tte_data + 0x400000, KERNBASE + 0x400000); - }
inherit_locked_prom_mappings(0);
arch/sparc64/kernel/trampoline.S +84 -1
@@ -90,7 +90,9 @@ sllx %g2, 32, %g2 wr %g2, 0, %tick_cmpr - /* Call OBP by hand to lock KERNBASE into i/d tlbs. */ + /* Call OBP by hand to lock KERNBASE into i/d tlbs. + * We lock 2 consequetive entries if we are 'bigkernel'. + */ mov %o0, %l0 sethi %hi(prom_entry_lock), %g2
@@ -136,6 +138,46 @@ call %o1 add %sp, (2047 + 128), %o0 + sethi %hi(bigkernel), %g2 + lduw [%g2 + %lo(bigkernel)], %g2 + cmp %g2, 0 + be,pt %icc, do_dtlb + nop + + sethi %hi(call_method), %g2 + or %g2, %lo(call_method), %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x00] + mov 5, %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x08] + mov 1, %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x10] + sethi %hi(itlb_load), %g2 + or %g2, %lo(itlb_load), %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x18] + sethi %hi(mmu_ihandle_cache), %g2 + lduw [%g2 + %lo(mmu_ihandle_cache)], %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x20] + sethi %hi(KERNBASE + 0x400000), %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x28] + sethi %hi(kern_locked_tte_data), %g2 + ldx [%g2 + %lo(kern_locked_tte_data)], %g2 + sethi %hi(0x400000), %g1 + add %g2, %g1, %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x30] + + mov 14, %g2 + BRANCH_IF_ANY_CHEETAH(g1,g5,1f) + + mov 62, %g2 +1: + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x38] + sethi %hi(p1275buf), %g2 + or %g2, %lo(p1275buf), %g2 + ldx [%g2 + 0x08], %o1 + call %o1 + add %sp, (2047 + 128), %o0 + +do_dtlb: sethi %hi(call_method), %g2 or %g2, %lo(call_method), %g2 stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x00]
@@ -168,6 +210,47 @@ call %o1 add %sp, (2047 + 128), %o0 + sethi %hi(bigkernel), %g2 + lduw [%g2 + %lo(bigkernel)], %g2 + cmp %g2, 0 + be,pt %icc, do_unlock + nop + + sethi %hi(call_method), %g2 + or %g2, %lo(call_method), %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x00] + mov 5, %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x08] + mov 1, %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x10] + sethi %hi(dtlb_load), %g2 + or %g2, %lo(dtlb_load), %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x18] + sethi %hi(mmu_ihandle_cache), %g2 + lduw [%g2 + %lo(mmu_ihandle_cache)], %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x20] + sethi %hi(KERNBASE + 0x400000), %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x28] + sethi %hi(kern_locked_tte_data), %g2 + ldx [%g2 + %lo(kern_locked_tte_data)], %g2 + sethi %hi(0x400000), %g1 + add %g2, %g1, %g2 + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x30] + + mov 14, %g2 + BRANCH_IF_ANY_CHEETAH(g1,g5,1f) + + mov 62, %g2 +1: + + stx %g2, [%sp + 2047 + 128 + 0x38] + sethi %hi(p1275buf), %g2 + or %g2, %lo(p1275buf), %g2 + ldx [%g2 + 0x08], %o1 + call %o1 + add %sp, (2047 + 128), %o0 + +do_unlock: sethi %hi(prom_entry_lock), %g2 stb %g0, [%g2 + %lo(prom_entry_lock)] membar #StoreStore | #StoreLoad
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. #
# ChangeSet
# 2004/12/04 19:34:20-08:00 [email protected]
# [SPARC64]: Fix SMP cpu bringup bug when bigkernel.
#
# We have to load the bigkernel second TLB entry on # secondary processors before we move over the use # the kernel trap table. Otherwise we can take a # TLB miss somewhere in the post-4MB area and the # TLB handler is not prepared to service that. # # The case that usually occurs is the prom_set_trap_table # call made by trampoline.S, since p1275buf usually sits # very near the end of the kernel image. It worked by # luck most of the time as long as p1275buf sits within # a single page since earlier code running in trampoline.S # forced that TLB entry to be loaded by the OBP TLB miss # handler.
#
# This was not fun to figure out.
#
# Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
#
# arch/sparc64/kernel/trampoline.S
# 2004/12/04 19:33:42-08:00 [email protected] +84 -1
# [SPARC64]: Fix SMP cpu bringup bug when bigkernel.
#
# arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c # 2004/12/04 19:33:42-08:00 [email protected] +0 -9 # [SPARC64]: Fix SMP cpu bringup bug when bigkernel. # diff -Nru a/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c --- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c 2004-12-04 19:41:44 -08:00 +++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c 2004-12-04 19:41:44 -08:00 @@ -103,15 +103,6 @@ void __init smp_callin(void) { int cpuid = hard_smp_processor_id(); - extern int bigkernel; - extern unsigned long kern_locked_tte_data; - - if (bigkernel) { - prom_dtlb_load(sparc64_highest_locked_tlbent()-1, - kern_locked_tte_data + 0x400000, KERNBASE + 0x400000); - prom_itlb_load(sparc64_highest_locked_tlbent()-1, - kern_locked_tte_data + 0x400000, KERNBASE + 0x400000); - }
inherit_locked_prom_mappings(0);
arch/sparc64/kernel/trampoline.S +84 -1
103 lines not on this page · raw message
Quoted 5 lines · David S. Miller
This bug has been around for quite some time, is present in both 2.4.x and 2.6.x, and only triggers sporadically. It depends upon the size of the kernel image and how the BSS section is layed out. Specifically both of the following conditions must hold to hit the bug:
Quoted 8 lines
1) The kernel must be > 4MB in size. You can check this via looking at System.map for the kernel image and checking if the final symbol "
_end" is at an address >=0x800000
2) The object "p1275buf" must cross aPAGE_SIZE(8K) boundary. If this is true, secondary cpus will not boot up and instead will hang in the kernel TLB miss handler.
The attached patches for 2.4.x and 2.6.x fix the problem and I'll be pushing these upstream right after this email goes out.
I'll spin this up for a test. I'll try to beef up my .config for the occasion.
-- wli
Quoted 8 lines
1) The kernel must be > 4MB in size. You can check this via looking at System.map for the kernel image and checking if the final symbol "
_end" is at an address >=0x8000002) The object "p1275buf" must cross a
PAGE_SIZE(8K) boundary.If this is true, secondary cpus will not boot up and instead will hang in the kernel TLB miss handler.
Cool. This sounds like the bug that hit once during the bigkernel/silo testing.
Signature · 4 lines
Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/