ondemand improvements, new 'conservative' governor

Hi Alex, Venki,

IIRC you (Alex) wrote a few improvements to the ondemand governor -- and IIRC they aren't all merged yet, as a few issues were still left? Also, what's the status of your 'conservative' governor. Also IIRC it was missing some improvements made to the ondeamnd governor in the meantime.

Thanks,
Dominik

Dominik,

There were some improvements that I had finished porting over however then for some reason it just stopped working. Although the module worked and did not kill the machine, regardless of the load it never increased the cpufreq. :(

I was going to fix it once I had put back in some debugging information (probably that 'evil' hack I tried to disguise as debugging which you all saw through :) Also I thought of a nicer way to actually store the 'desired' cpufreq without making it global which I was going to add.

I am free this weekend, girlfriend is away so I do not have to keep her entertained which means some quality geek time.

I would of done it earlier but as interest never seemed to go beyond a few friends of mine and one or two people on the mailing list I did not have people poking me into action; however I guess that happens with every patch.

I'll speak to you later this week, I would do it midweek but I'm looking for a new flat

Cheers

Alex

 _________________________________________ 
/ What you don't know won't help you much \
| either.                                 |
|                                         |
\ -- D. Bennett                           /
 ----------------------------------------- 
        \   ^__^
         \  (oo)\_______
            (__)\       )\/\
                ||----w |
                ||     ||

_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq