u-boot.lds questions
I've "successfully" built my u-boot port (it doesn't throw warnings/error).
To do so I just copied some u-boot.lds from some other port. I know that the u-boot.lds is a linker script that instructs the linker to put code elements together in some specific way. At least the first part does so. But the lower parts of the u-boot.lds I copied seem to be increasingly deep magic. So... what does the u-boot.lds do exactly and what happens if mine is wrong/broken? And why do I need it anyway?
The built put out the following things in the main directory:
-rwxr-x--- 1234997 Jan 19 12:51 u-boot
-rwxr-x--- 171372 Jan 19 12:51 u-boot.bin
-rw-r----- 94836 Jan 19 12:51 u-boot.map
-rwxr-x--- 514202 Jan 19 12:51 u-boot.srec
there are some parts that probably are important in board/esm (my board's directory) too:
-rw-r----- 17000 Jan 17 16:05 esm.o
-rw-r----- 17176 Jan 17 16:05 libesm.a
Does that look reasonable/good?
Peter Asemann
Quoted 6 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
To do so I just copied some
u-boot.ldsfrom some other port. I know that theu-boot.ldsis a linker script that instructs the linker to put code elements together in some specific way. At least the first part does so. But the lower parts of theu-boot.ldsI copied seem to be increasingly deep magic. So... what does theu-boot.ldsdo exactly and
I can't put it any better: It is a linker script that instructs the linker to put code elements together in some specific way.
Quoted 1 line
what happens if mine is wrong/broken? And why do I need it anyway?
Your code will not run and/or crash.
You need it to get a working image.
Quoted 1 line
Does that look reasonable/good?
This is impossible to say from this information. u-boot.map might be interesting to check - for you; please don't post it here, though.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 4 lines
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de "Spock, did you see the looks on their faces?" "Yes, Captain, a sort of vacant contentment."