Extended matches and basic classifier
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 Extended matches and basic classifier
This patchset adds the ematch API, the ematches cmp, nbyte, u32, meta, and the basic classifier. It doesn't touch any existing code.
The following changes were made since the last review:
- various typo and bug fixes
- macro for meta data collectors (beautification)
- some more comments
The required changes for iproute2 can be pulled from:
bk://tgr.bkbits.net/iproute2-tgr
The iproute2 part still has quite some potential for improvements to ease usability though.
Cheers, Thomas
PATCH 1/6 PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API
An extended match (ematch) is a small classifiction tool not worth writing a full classifier for. Ematches can be interconnected to form a logic expression and get attached to classifiers to extend their functionatlity.
The userspace part transforms the logic expressions into an array consisting of multiple sequences of interconnected ematches separated by markers. Precedence is implemented by a special ematch kind referencing a sequence beyond the marker of the current sequence causing the current position in the sequence to be pushed onto a stack to allow the current position to be overwritten by the position referenced in the special ematch. Matching continues in the new sequence until a marker is reached causing the position to be restored from the stack.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +72 -0
@@ -319,4 +319,76 @@#define TCA_TCINDEX_MAX (__TCA_TCINDEX_MAX - 1) +/* Extended Matches */ + +struct tcf_ematch_tree_hdr +{ +__u16 nmatches; +__u16 progid; +}; + +enum +{ +TCA_EMATCH_TREE_UNSPEC , +TCA_EMATCH_TREE_HDR , +TCA_EMATCH_TREE_LIST , + __TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX +}; +#define TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX (__TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX - 1) + +struct tcf_ematch_hdr +{ +__u16 matchid; +__u16 kind; +__u16 flags; +__u16 pad;/* currently unused */ +}; + +/* 0 1 +* 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 +* +-----------------------+-+-+---+ +* | Unused |S|I| R | +* +-----------------------+-+-+---+ +* +* R(2) ::= relation to next ematch +* where: 0 0 END (last ematch) +* 0 1 AND +* 1 0 OR +* 1 1 Unused (invalid) +* I(1) ::= invert result +* S(1) ::= simple payload +*/ +#define TCF_EM_REL_END 0 +#define TCF_EM_REL_AND (1<<0) +#define TCF_EM_REL_OR (1<<1) +#define TCF_EM_INVERT (1<<2) +#define TCF_EM_SIMPLE (1<<3) + +#define TCF_EM_REL_MASK 3 +#define TCF_EM_REL_VALID (v) (((v) & TCF_EM_REL_MASK) != TCF_EM_REL_MASK) + +enum +{ +TCF_LAYER_LINK , +TCF_LAYER_NETWORK , +TCF_LAYER_TRANSPORT , + __TCF_LAYER_MAX +}; +#define TCF_LAYER_MAX (__TCF_LAYER_MAX - 1) + +/* Ematch type assignments +* 1..32767 Reserved for ematches inside kernel tree +* 32768..65535 Free to use, not reliable +*/ +enum +{ +TCF_EM_CONTAINER , + __TCF_EM_MAX +}; + +enum +{ +TCF_EM_PROG_TC +}; +#endif
include/linux/rtnetlink.h +5 -0
@@ -779,6 +779,11 @@ goto rtattr_failure; \ __rta_fill(skb, attrtype, attrlen, data); }) +#define RTA_PUT_NOHDR (skb, attrlen, data) \ +({ if (unlikely(skb_tailroom(skb) < (int)(attrlen))) \ + goto rtattr_failure; \ + memcpy(skb_put(skb, RTA_ALIGN(attrlen)), data, attrlen); }) +static inline struct rtattr *__rta_reserve (struct sk_buff *skb,int attrtype,int attrlen) {
include/net/pkt_cls.h +170 -0
176 lines not on this page · raw message
net/sched/Kconfig +23 -0
@@ -375,6 +375,29 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called cls_rsvp6. +config NET_EMATCH + bool "Extended Matches" + depends on NET_CLS + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to use extended matches on top of classifiers + and select the extended matches below. + + Extended matches are small classification helpers not worth writing + a separate classifier. + + You must have a recent version of the iproute2 tools in order to use + extended matches. + +config NET_EMATCH_STACK + int "Stack size" + depends on NET_EMATCH + default "32" + ---help--- + Size of the local stack variable used while evaluating the tree of + ematches. Limits the depth of the tree, i.e. the number of + encapsulated precedences. Every level requires 4 bytes of addtional + stack space. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP) += cls_rsvp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_TCINDEX) += cls_tcindex.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6) += cls_rsvp6.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o
net/sched/ematch.c +526 -0
526 lines not on this page · raw message
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API
Quoted 26 lines · Thomas Graf
diff -Nru
linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk1.orig/include/net/pkt_cls.hlinux-2.6.11-rc2-bk1/include/net/pkt_cls.hinclude/net/pkt_cls.h +19
-0@@ -148,6 +148,176 @@extern int tcf_exts_dump_stats (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_exts *exts,struct tcf_ext_map *map); +/** +* struct tcf_pkt_info - packet information +*/ +struct tcf_pkt_info +{ +}; + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_EMATCH + +struct tcf_ematch_ops ; + +/** +* struct tcf_ematch - extended match (ematch) +* +* @matchid: identifier to allow userspace to reidentify a match +* @flags: flags specifying attributes and the relation to other matches +* @ops: the operations lookup table of the corresponding ematch module +* @datalen: length of the ematch specific configuration data +* @data: ematch specific data
include/net/pkt_cls.h line 179
Quoted 10 lines
include/net/pkt_cls.h +9
-0+*/ +struct tcf_ematch +{ +u16 matchid; +u16 flags; +struct tcf_ematch_ops * ops; +unsigned int datalen; +unsigned long data; +};
This layout leaves two holes on 64 bit, how about:
{
struct tcf_ematch_ops *ops;
unsigned long data;
unsigned int datalen;
u16 matchid;
u16 flags;
};
Quoted 107 lines
diff -Nru
linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk1.orig/net/sched/ematch.clinux-2.6.11-rc2-bk1/net/sched/ematch.cnet/sched/ematch.c +101
-0@@ -0,0 +1,526 @@ +/* +* net/sched/ematch.c Extended Match API +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License +* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version +* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +* +* Authors: Thomas Graf <[email protected]> +* +* ========================================================================== +* +* An extended match (ematch) is a small classification tool not worth +* writing a full classifier for. Ematches can be interconnected to form +* a logic expression and get attached to classifiers to extend their +* functionatlity. +* +* The userspace part transforms the logic expressions into an array +* consisting of multiple sequences of interconnected ematches separated +* by markers. Precedence is implemented by a special ematch kind +* referencing a sequence beyond the marker of the current sequence +* causing the current position in the sequence to be pushed onto a stack +* to allow the current position to be overwritten by the position referenced +* in the special ematch. Matching continues in the new sequence until a +* marker is reached causing the position to be restored from the stack. +* +* Example: +* A AND (B1 OR B2) AND C AND D +* +* ------->-PUSH------- +* -->-- / -->-- \ -->-- +* / \ / / \ \ / \ +* +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ +* | A AND | B AND | C AND | D END | B1 OR | B2 END | +* +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+ +* \ / +* --------<-POP--------- +* +* where B is a virtual ematch referencing to sequence starting with B1. +* +* ========================================================================== +* +* How to write an ematch in 60 seconds +* ------------------------------------ +* +* 1) Provide a matcher function: +* static int my_match(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_ematch *m, +* struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +* { +* struct mydata *d = (struct mydata *) m->data; +* +* if (...matching goes here...) +* return 1; +* else +* return 0; +* } +* +* 2) Fill out a struct tcf_ematch_ops: +* static struct tcf_ematch_ops my_ops = { +* .kind = unique id, +* .datalen = sizeof(struct mydata), +* .match = my_match, +* .owner = THIS_MODULE, +* }; +* +* 3) Register/Unregister your ematch: +* static int __init init_my_ematch(void) +* { +* return tcf_em_register(&my_ops); +* } +* +* static void __exit exit_my_ematch(void) +* { +* return tcf_em_unregister(&my_ops); +* } +* +* module_init(init_my_ematch); +* module_exit(exit_my_ematch); +* +* 4) By now you should have two more seconds left, barely enough to +* open up a beer to watch the compilation going. +*/ + +#include <linux/config.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/rtnetlink.h> +#include <linux/skbuff.h> +#include <net/pkt_cls.h> +#include <config/net/ematch/stack.h> + +static LIST_HEAD (ematch_ops); +static DEFINE_RWLOCK (ematch_mod_lock); + +static inline struct tcf_ematch_ops *tcf_em_lookup (u16 kind) +{
net/sched/ematch.c line 111
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +10
-0+struct tcf_ematch_ops *e =NULL ; + +read_lock (&ematch_mod_lock); +list_for_each_entry (e, &ematch_ops, link) { +if (kind == e->kind) { +if (!try_module_get (e->owner)) + e =NULL ; +break ; + } + }
e is the iterator, if nothing matched it will contain the last element now
Quoted 280 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +278
-0+read_unlock (&ematch_mod_lock); + +return e; +} + +/** +* tcf_em_register - register an extended match +* +* @ops: ematch operations lookup table +* +* This function must be called by ematches to announce their presence. +* The given @ops must have kind set to a unique identifier and the +* callback match() must be implemented. All other callbacks are optional +* and a fallback implementation is used instead. +* +* Returns -EEXISTS if an ematch of the same kind has already registered. +*/ +int tcf_em_register (struct tcf_ematch_ops *ops) +{ +int err = -EEXIST ; +struct tcf_ematch_ops *e; + +write_lock (&ematch_mod_lock); +list_for_each_entry (e, &ematch_ops, link) +if (ops->kind == e->kind) + goto errout; + +list_add_tail (&ops->link, &ematch_ops); + err =0 ; +errout: +write_unlock (&ematch_mod_lock); +return err; +} + +/** +* tcf_em_unregister - unregster and extended match +* +* @ops: ematch operations lookup table +* +* This function must be called by ematches to announce their disappearance +* for examples when the module gets unloaded. The @ops parameter must be +* the same as the one used for registration. +* +* Returns -ENOENT if no matching ematch was found. +*/ +int tcf_em_unregister (struct tcf_ematch_ops *ops) +{ +int err =0 ; +struct tcf_ematch_ops *e; + +write_lock (&ematch_mod_lock); +list_for_each_entry (e, &ematch_ops, link) { +if (e == ops) { +list_del (&e->link); + goto out; + } + } + + err = -ENOENT ; +out: +write_unlock (&ematch_mod_lock); +return err; +} + +static inline struct tcf_ematch *tcf_em_get_match (struct tcf_ematch_tree *tree, +int index) +{ +return &tree->matches[index]; +} + + +static int tcf_em_validate (struct tcf_proto *tp, +struct tcf_ematch_tree_hdr *tree_hdr, +struct tcf_ematch *em,struct rtattr *rta,int idx) +{ +int err = -EINVAL ; +struct tcf_ematch_hdr *em_hdr =RTA_DATA (rta); +int data_len =RTA_PAYLOAD (rta) -sizeof (*em_hdr); +void *data = (void *) em_hdr +sizeof (*em_hdr); + +if (!TCF_EM_REL_VALID (em_hdr->flags)) + goto errout; + +if (em_hdr->kind ==TCF_EM_CONTAINER ) { +/* Special ematch called "container", carries an index +* referencing an external ematch sequence. */ +u32 ref; + +if (data_len <sizeof (ref)) + goto errout; + ref = *(u32 *) data; + +if (ref >= tree_hdr->nmatches) + goto errout; + +/* We do not allow backward jumps to avoid loops and jumps +* to our own position are of course illegal. */ +if (ref <= idx) + goto errout; + + + em->data = ref; + }else { +/* Note: This lookup will increase the module refcnt +* of the ematch module referenced. In case of a failure, +* a destroy function is called by the underlying layer +* which automatically releases the reference again, therefore +* the module MUST not be given back under any circumstances +* here. Be aware, the destroy function assumes that the +* module is held if the ops field is non zero. */ + em->ops =tcf_em_lookup (em_hdr->kind); + +if (em->ops ==NULL ) { + err = -ENOENT ; + goto errout; + } + +/* ematch module provides expected length of data, so we +* can do a basic sanity check. */ +if (em->ops->datalen && data_len < em->ops->datalen) + goto errout; + +if (em->ops->change) { + err = em->ops->change (tp, data, data_len, em); +if (err <0 ) + goto errout; + }else if (data_len >0 ) { +/* ematch module doesn't provide an own change +* procedure and expects us to allocate and copy +* the ematch data. +* +* TCF_EM_SIMPLE may be specified stating that the +* data only consists of a u32 integer and the module +* does not expected a memory reference but rather +* the value carried. */ +if (em_hdr->flags &TCF_EM_SIMPLE ) { +if (data_len <sizeof (u32)) + goto errout; + em->data = *(u32 *) data; + }else { +void *v =kmalloc (data_len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (v ==NULL ) { + err = -ENOBUFS ; + goto errout; + } +memcpy (v, data, data_len); + em->data = (unsigned long ) v; + } + } + } + + em->matchid = em_hdr->matchid; + em->flags = em_hdr->flags; + em->datalen = data_len; + + err =0 ; +errout: +return err; +} + +/** +* tcf_em_tree_validate - validate ematch config TLV and build ematch tree +* +* @tp: classifier kind handle +* @rta: ematch tree configuration TLV +* @tree: destination ematch tree variable to store the resulting +* ematch tree. +* +* This function validates the given configuration TLV @rta and builds an +* ematch tree in @tree. The resulting tree must later be copied into +* the private classifier data using tcf_em_tree_change(). You MUST NOT +* provide the ematch tree variable of the private classifier data directly, +* the changes would not be locked properly. +* +* Returns a negative error code if the configuration TLV contains errors. +*/ +int tcf_em_tree_validate (struct tcf_proto *tp,struct rtattr *rta, +struct tcf_ematch_tree *tree) +{ +int idx, list_len, matches_len, err = -EINVAL ; +struct rtattr *tb[TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX ]; +struct rtattr *rt_match, *rt_hdr, *rt_list; +struct tcf_ematch_tree_hdr *tree_hdr; +struct tcf_ematch *em; + +if (rtattr_parse_nested (tb,TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX , rta) <0 ) + goto errout; + + rt_hdr = tb[TCA_EMATCH_TREE_HDR -1 ]; + rt_list = tb[TCA_EMATCH_TREE_LIST -1 ]; + +if (rt_hdr ==NULL || rt_list ==NULL ) + goto errout; + +if (RTA_PAYLOAD (rt_hdr) <sizeof (*tree_hdr) || +RTA_PAYLOAD (rt_list) <sizeof (*rt_match)) + goto errout; + + tree_hdr =RTA_DATA (rt_hdr); +memcpy (&tree->hdr, tree_hdr,sizeof (*tree_hdr)); + + rt_match =RTA_DATA (rt_list); + list_len =RTA_PAYLOAD (rt_list); + matches_len = tree_hdr->nmatches *sizeof (*em); + + tree->matches =kmalloc (matches_len,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (tree->matches ==NULL ) + goto errout; +memset (tree->matches,0 , matches_len); + +/* We do not use rtattr_parse_nested here because the maximum +* number of attributes is unknown. This saves us the allocation +* for a tb buffer which would serve no purpose at all. +* +* The array of rt attributes is parsed in the order as they are +* provided, their type must be incremental from 1 to n. Even +* if it does not serve any real purpose, a failure of sticking +* to this policy will result in parsing failure. */ +for (idx =0 ;RTA_OK (rt_match, list_len); idx++) { + err = -EINVAL ; + +if (rt_match->rta_type != (idx +1 )) + goto errout_abort; + +if (idx >= tree_hdr->nmatches) + goto errout_abort; + +if (RTA_PAYLOAD (rt_match) <sizeof (struct tcf_ematch_hdr )) + goto errout_abort; + + em =tcf_em_get_match (tree, idx); + + err =tcf_em_validate (tp, tree_hdr, em, rt_match, idx); +if (err <0 ) + goto errout_abort; + + rt_match =RTA_NEXT (rt_match, list_len); + } + +/* Check if the number of matches provided by userspace actually +* complies with the array of matches. The number was used for +* the validation of references and a mismatch could lead to +* undefined references during the matching process. */ +if (idx != tree_hdr->nmatches) { + err = -EINVAL ; + goto errout_abort; + } + + err =0 ; +errout: +return err; + +errout_abort: +tcf_em_tree_destroy (tp, tree); +return err; +} + +/** +* tcf_em_tree_destroy - destroy an ematch tree +* +* @tp: classifier kind handle +* @tree: ematch tree to be deleted +* +* This functions destroys an ematch tree previously created by +* tcf_em_tree_validate()/tcf_em_tree_change(). You must ensure that +* the ematch tree is not in use before calling this function. +*/ +void tcf_em_tree_destroy (struct tcf_proto *tp,struct tcf_ematch_tree *tree) +{ +int i; + +if (tree->matches ==NULL ) +return ; + +for (i =0 ; i < tree->hdr.nmatches; i++) { +struct tcf_ematch *em =tcf_em_get_match (tree, i); + +if (em->ops) {
net/sched/ematch.c line 399
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +10
-0+if (em->ops->destroy) + em->ops->destroy (tp, em); +else if (!tcf_em_is_simple (em) && em->data) +kfree ((void *) em->data); +module_put (em->ops->owner); + } + } + + tree->hdr.nmatches =0 ; +kfree (xchg (&tree->matches,NULL ));
xchg is not necessary here. Setting tree->matches to NULL also doesn't look necessary. As the comment above indicates, the caller needs to ensure the tree is unsused, so it should be easy for him to ensure he won't destroy the same tree twice.
Quoted 56 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +54
-0+} + +/** +* tcf_em_tree_dump - dump ematch tree into a rtnl message +* +* @skb: skb holding the rtnl message +* @t: ematch tree to be dumped +* @tlv: TLV type to be used to encapsulate the tree +* +* This function dumps a ematch tree into a rtnl message. It is valid to +* call this function while the ematch tree is in use. +* +* Returns -1 if the skb tailroom is insufficient. +*/ +int tcf_em_tree_dump (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch_tree *tree,int tlv) +{ +int i; +struct rtattr * top_start = (struct rtattr *) skb->tail; +struct rtattr * list_start; + +RTA_PUT (skb, tlv,0 ,NULL ); +RTA_PUT (skb,TCA_EMATCH_TREE_HDR ,sizeof (tree->hdr), &tree->hdr); + + list_start = (struct rtattr *) skb->tail; +RTA_PUT (skb,TCA_EMATCH_TREE_LIST ,0 ,NULL ); + +for (i =0 ; i < tree->hdr.nmatches; i++) { +struct rtattr *match_start = (struct rtattr *) skb->tail; +struct tcf_ematch *em =tcf_em_get_match (tree, i); +struct tcf_ematch_hdr em_hdr = { + .kind = em->ops ? em->ops->kind :TCF_EM_CONTAINER , + .matchid = em->matchid, + .flags = em->flags + }; + +RTA_PUT (skb, i+1 ,sizeof (em_hdr), &em_hdr); + +if (em->ops && em->ops->dump) { +if (em->ops->dump (skb, em) <0 ) + goto rtattr_failure; + }else if (tcf_em_is_container (em) ||tcf_em_is_simple (em)) { +u32 u = em->data; +RTA_PUT_NOHDR (skb,sizeof (u), &u); + }else if (em->datalen >0 ) +RTA_PUT_NOHDR (skb, em->datalen, (void *) em->data); + + match_start->rta_len = skb->tail - (u8 *) match_start; + } + + list_start->rta_len = skb->tail - (u8 *) list_start; + top_start->rta_len = skb->tail - (u8 *) top_start; + +return 0 ; +
net/sched/ematch.c line 463
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +10
-0+rtattr_failure: +return -1 ; +} + +static inline int tcf_em_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch *em, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ +int r; + +if (likely (em->ops->match))
gcc assumes likely for ptr != NULL by default. Is there a reason why a match wouldn't have a match function ?
Quoted 68 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +63
-0+ r = em->ops->match (skb, em, info); + else + r =0 ; + +return tcf_em_is_inverted (em) ? !r : r; +} + +/* Do not use this function directly, use tcf_em_tree_match instead */ +int __tcf_em_tree_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch_tree *tree, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ +int stackp =0 , match_idx =0 , res =0 ; +struct tcf_ematch *cur_match; +int stack[CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_STACK ]; + +proceed: +while (match_idx < tree->hdr.nmatches) { + cur_match =tcf_em_get_match (tree, match_idx); + +if (tcf_em_is_container (cur_match)) { +if (unlikely (stackp >=CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_STACK )) + goto stack_overflow; + + stack[stackp++] = match_idx; + match_idx = cur_match->data; + goto proceed; + } + + res =tcf_em_match (skb, cur_match, info); + +if (tcf_em_early_end (cur_match, res)) +break ; + + match_idx++; + } + +pop_stack: +if (stackp >0 ) { + match_idx = stack[--stackp]; + cur_match =tcf_em_get_match (tree, match_idx); + +if (tcf_em_early_end (cur_match, res)) + goto pop_stack; +else { + match_idx++; + goto proceed; + } + } + +return res; + +stack_overflow: +if (net_ratelimit ()) +printk ("Local stack overflow, increase NET_EMATCH_STACK\n" ); +return -1 ; +} + +EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcf_em_register); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcf_em_unregister); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcf_em_tree_validate); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcf_em_tree_destroy); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (tcf_em_tree_dump); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (__tcf_em_tree_match);
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API
* Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 01:12
Quoted 12 lines
include/net/pkt_cls.h line 178
Quoted 9 lines · Thomas Graf
include/net/pkt_cls.h +8
-0+struct tcf_ematch +{ +u16 matchid; +u16 flags; +struct tcf_ematch_ops * ops; +unsigned int datalen; +unsigned long data; +};This layout leaves two holes on 64 bit, how about:
Quoted 7 lines
{
struct tcf_ematch_ops *ops;
unsigned long data;
unsigned int datalen;
u16 matchid;
u16 flags;
};Good point.
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/ematch.c line 111
Quoted 9 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +8
-0+read_lock (&ematch_mod_lock); +list_for_each_entry (e, &ematch_ops, link) { +if (kind == e->kind) { +if (!try_module_get (e->owner)) + e =NULL ; +break ; + } + }e is the iterator, if nothing matched it will contain the last element now
Damn, yes. Still used to have the iterator being NULL in loops. Probably made this mistake in other spots too, will check this.
Quoted 8 lines
net/sched/ematch.c line 399
Quoted 4 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +2
-0+ tree->hdr.nmatches =0 ; +kfree (xchg (&tree->matches,NULL ));xchg is not necessary here. Setting
tree->matchesto NULL also doesn't look necessary. As the comment above indicates, the caller needs to ensure the tree is unsused, so it should be easy for him to ensure he won't destroy the same tree twice.
It's not necessary but I do call tcf_em_tree_destroy internally and I want to provide a consistent interface to the outside world. It's argueable for sure. The xchg doesn't have any locking purposes and I can understand if it confuses readers so I'll remove it.
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/ematch.c line 463
Quoted 8 lines
net/sched/ematch.c +6
-0+static inline int tcf_em_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch *em, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ +int r; + +if (likely (em->ops->match))gcc assumes likely for ptr != NULL by default. Is there a reason why a match wouldn't have a match function ?
There is no reason but ematches might get written by unexperienced people forgeting to register it. I know, the if partly hides the failure, it's one of theses case where I have the same arguments for both ways.
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API
Quoted 11 lines · Thomas Graf
* Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 01:12
Quoted 3 lines
gcc assumes likely for ptr != NULL by default. Is there a reason why a match wouldn't have a match function ?
There is no reason but ematches might get written by unexperienced people forgeting to register it. I know, the if partly hides the failure, it's one of theses case where I have the same arguments for both ways.
I don't care much, but I guess people forgetting to add a match function to an ematch will find other ways to do stupid things :) How about catching it in tcf_em_register ?
Regards
Patrick
Re: [PATCH 1/6] PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API
* Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 01:56
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Graf
* Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 01:12
Quoted 4 lines
gcc assumes likely for ptr != NULL by default. Is there a reason why a match
wouldn't have a match function ?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
There is no reason but ematches might get written by unexperienced people forgeting to register it. I know, the if partly hides the failure, it's one of theses case where I have the same arguments for both ways.
I don't care much, but I guess people forgetting to add a match function to an ematch will find other ways to do stupid things :) How about catching it in
tcf_em_register?
Sounds like a good plan, will do so. Thanks.
PATCH RESEND 1/6 PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API
In reply to Thomas GrafResend with Patrick's comments addressed.
An extended match (ematch) is a small classifiction tool not worth writing a full classifier for. Ematches can be interconnected to form a logic expression and get attached to classifiers to extend their functionatlity.
The userspace part transforms the logic expressions into an array consisting of multiple sequences of interconnected ematches separated by markers. Precedence is implemented by a special ematch kind referencing a sequence beyond the marker of the current sequence causing the current position in the sequence to be pushed onto a stack to allow the current position to be overwritten by the position referenced in the special ematch. Matching continues in the new sequence until a marker is reached causing the position to be restored from the stack.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +72 -0
@@ -319,4 +319,76 @@#define TCA_TCINDEX_MAX (__TCA_TCINDEX_MAX - 1) +/* Extended Matches */ + +struct tcf_ematch_tree_hdr +{ +__u16 nmatches; +__u16 progid; +}; + +enum +{ +TCA_EMATCH_TREE_UNSPEC , +TCA_EMATCH_TREE_HDR , +TCA_EMATCH_TREE_LIST , + __TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX +}; +#define TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX (__TCA_EMATCH_TREE_MAX - 1) + +struct tcf_ematch_hdr +{ +__u16 matchid; +__u16 kind; +__u16 flags; +__u16 pad;/* currently unused */ +}; + +/* 0 1 +* 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 +* +-----------------------+-+-+---+ +* | Unused |S|I| R | +* +-----------------------+-+-+---+ +* +* R(2) ::= relation to next ematch +* where: 0 0 END (last ematch) +* 0 1 AND +* 1 0 OR +* 1 1 Unused (invalid) +* I(1) ::= invert result +* S(1) ::= simple payload +*/ +#define TCF_EM_REL_END 0 +#define TCF_EM_REL_AND (1<<0) +#define TCF_EM_REL_OR (1<<1) +#define TCF_EM_INVERT (1<<2) +#define TCF_EM_SIMPLE (1<<3) + +#define TCF_EM_REL_MASK 3 +#define TCF_EM_REL_VALID (v) (((v) & TCF_EM_REL_MASK) != TCF_EM_REL_MASK) + +enum +{ +TCF_LAYER_LINK , +TCF_LAYER_NETWORK , +TCF_LAYER_TRANSPORT , + __TCF_LAYER_MAX +}; +#define TCF_LAYER_MAX (__TCF_LAYER_MAX - 1) + +/* Ematch type assignments +* 1..32767 Reserved for ematches inside kernel tree +* 32768..65535 Free to use, not reliable +*/ +enum +{ +TCF_EM_CONTAINER , + __TCF_EM_MAX +}; + +enum +{ +TCF_EM_PROG_TC +}; +#endif
include/linux/rtnetlink.h +5 -0
@@ -779,6 +779,11 @@ goto rtattr_failure; \ __rta_fill(skb, attrtype, attrlen, data); }) +#define RTA_PUT_NOHDR (skb, attrlen, data) \ +({ if (unlikely(skb_tailroom(skb) < (int)(attrlen))) \ + goto rtattr_failure; \ + memcpy(skb_put(skb, RTA_ALIGN(attrlen)), data, attrlen); }) +static inline struct rtattr *__rta_reserve (struct sk_buff *skb,int attrtype,int attrlen) {
include/net/pkt_cls.h +170 -0
176 lines not on this page · raw message
net/sched/Kconfig +23 -0
@@ -375,6 +375,29 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called cls_rsvp6. +config NET_EMATCH + bool "Extended Matches" + depends on NET_CLS + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to use extended matches on top of classifiers + and select the extended matches below. + + Extended matches are small classification helpers not worth writing + a separate classifier. + + You must have a recent version of the iproute2 tools in order to use + extended matches. + +config NET_EMATCH_STACK + int "Stack size" + depends on NET_EMATCH + default "32" + ---help--- + Size of the local stack variable used while evaluating the tree of + ematches. Limits the depth of the tree, i.e. the number of + encapsulated precedences. Every level requires 4 bytes of addtional + stack space. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP) += cls_rsvp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_TCINDEX) += cls_tcindex.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6) += cls_rsvp6.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o
net/sched/ematch.c +524 -0
524 lines not on this page · raw message
PATCH 2/6 PKT_SCHED: Simple comparison ematch (cmp)
In reply to Thomas GrafThe cmp ematch compares a static value provided by userspace against a 8, 16, or 32bit chunk read from the packet. The reading offset is provided by userspace and based on one of the skb layers (mac|nh|h). The ematch provides functionality to transform the byte order of the chunk and/or apply a mask and understands the operands eq, lt, and gt. Basically, it is very similiar to the u32 (e)match but tries filling the gaps left behind.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +8 -0
@@ -383,6 +383,7 @@enum {TCF_EM_CONTAINER , +TCF_EM_CMP , __TCF_EM_MAX };
@@ -391,4 +392,11 @@TCF_EM_PROG_TC }; +enum +{ +TCF_EM_OPND_EQ , +TCF_EM_OPND_GT , +TCF_EM_OPND_LT +}; +#endif
include/linux/tc_ematch/tc_em_cmp.h +26 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +#ifndef __LINUX_TC_EM_CMP_H +#define __LINUX_TC_EM_CMP_H + +#include <linux/pkt_cls.h> + +struct tcf_em_cmp +{ +__u32 val; +__u32 mask; +__u16 off; +__u8 align:4 ; +__u8 flags:4 ; +__u8 layer:4 ; +__u8 opnd:4 ; +}; + +enum +{ +TCF_EM_ALIGN_U8 =1 , +TCF_EM_ALIGN_U16 =2 , +TCF_EM_ALIGN_U32 =4 +}; + +#define TCF_EM_CMP_TRANS 1 + +#endif
include/net/pkt_cls.h +20 -0
@@ -318,6 +318,26 @@#endif /* CONFIG_NET_EMATCH */ +static inline unsigned char *tcf_get_base_ptr (struct sk_buff *skb,int layer) +{ +switch (layer) { +case TCF_LAYER_LINK : +return skb->data; +case TCF_LAYER_NETWORK : +return skb->nh.raw; +case TCF_LAYER_TRANSPORT : +return skb->h.raw; + } + +return NULL ; +} + +static inline int tcf_valid_offset (struct sk_buff *skb,unsigned char *ptr, +int len) +{ +return unlikely ((ptr + len) < skb->tail && ptr > skb->head); +} +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_IND static inline int tcf_change_indev (struct tcf_proto *tp,char *indev,struct rtattr *indev_tlv)
net/sched/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -398,6 +398,16 @@ encapsulated precedences. Every level requires 4 bytes of addtional stack space. +config NET_EMATCH_CMP + tristate "Simple packet data comparison" + depends on NET_EMATCH + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be able to classify packets based on + simple packet data comparisons for 8, 16, and 32bit values. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called em_cmp. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_TCINDEX) += cls_tcindex.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6) += cls_rsvp6.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o
net/sched/em_cmp.c +101 -0
101 lines not on this page · raw message
Re: [PATCH 2/6] PKT_SCHED: Simple comparison ematch (cmp)
Quoted 41 lines · Thomas Graf
diff -Nru
linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk1.orig/net/sched/em_cmp.clinux-2.6.11-rc2-bk1/net/sched/em_cmp.cnet/sched/em_cmp.c +35
-0@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +/* +* net/sched/em_cmp.c Simple packet data comparison ematch +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License +* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version +* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +* +* Authors: Thomas Graf <[email protected]> +*/ + +#include <linux/config.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/skbuff.h> +#include <linux/tc_ematch/tc_em_cmp.h> +#include <net/pkt_cls.h> + +static inline int cmp_needs_transformation (struct tcf_em_cmp *cmp) +{ +return unlikely (cmp->flags &TCF_EM_CMP_TRANS ); +} + +static int em_cmp_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch *em, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ +struct tcf_em_cmp *cmp = (struct tcf_em_cmp *) em->data; +unsigned char *ptr =tcf_get_base_ptr (skb, cmp->layer) + cmp->off; +u32 val =0 ; + +if (!tcf_valid_offset (skb, ptr, cmp->align)) +return 0 ; + +switch (cmp->align) {
net/sched/em_cmp.c line 45
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/em_cmp.c +10
-0+case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U8 : + val = *ptr; +break ; + +case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U16 : + val = *ptr <<8 ; + val |= *(ptr+1 ); + +if (cmp_needs_transformation (cmp)) + val =be16_to_cpu (val);
Why not simply convert cmp->val in userspace ?
Quoted 59 lines
net/sched/em_cmp.c +56
-0+break ; + +case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U32 : +/* Worth checking boundries? The branching seems +* to get worse. Visit again. */ + val = *ptr <<24 ; + val |= *(ptr+1 ) <<16 ; + val |= *(ptr+2 ) <<8 ; + val |= *(ptr+3 ); + +if (cmp_needs_transformation (cmp)) + val =be32_to_cpu (val); +break ; + +default : +return 0 ; + } + +if (cmp->mask) + val &= cmp->mask; + +switch (cmp->opnd) { +case TCF_EM_OPND_EQ : +return val == cmp->val; +case TCF_EM_OPND_LT : +return val < cmp->val; +case TCF_EM_OPND_GT : +return val > cmp->val; + } + +return 0 ; +} + +static struct tcf_ematch_ops em_cmp_ops = { + .kind =TCF_EM_CMP , + .datalen =sizeof (struct tcf_em_cmp ), + .match = em_cmp_match, + .owner =THIS_MODULE , + .link =LIST_HEAD_INIT (em_cmp_ops.link) +}; + +static int __init init_em_cmp (void ) +{ +return tcf_em_register (&em_cmp_ops); +} + +static void __exit exit_em_cmp(void) +{ +tcf_em_unregister (&em_cmp_ops); +} + +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); + +module_init (init_em_cmp); +module_exit (exit_em_cmp); +
Re: [PATCH 2/6] PKT_SCHED: Simple comparison ematch (cmp)
* Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 01:14
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 16 lines · Thomas Graf
net/sched/em_cmp.c +16
-0+static int em_cmp_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch *em, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ +struct tcf_em_cmp *cmp = (struct tcf_em_cmp *) em->data; +unsigned char *ptr =tcf_get_base_ptr (skb, cmp->layer) + cmp->off; +u32 val =0 ; + +if (!tcf_valid_offset (skb, ptr, cmp->align)) +return 0 ; + +switch (cmp->align) { +case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U8 : + val = *ptr; +break ; + +case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U16 :
Quoted 8 lines
net/sched/em_cmp.c line 45
Quoted 7 lines
net/sched/em_cmp.c +5
-0+ val = *ptr <<8 ; + val |= *(ptr+1 ); + +if (cmp_needs_transformation (cmp)) + val =be16_to_cpu (val);Why not simply convert
cmp->valin userspace ?
To allow comparing with lt and gt. I favoured transforming over byte order specific comparison routines.
PATCH 3/6 PKT_SCHED: Multi byte comparison ematch (nbyte)
In reply to Thomas GrafThe nbyte ematch allows comparing any number of bytes at an arbitary offset based on one of the skb layers. Its main usage is intended for IPv6 addresses but may be used for any kind of pattern.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +1 -0
@@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ {TCF_EM_CONTAINER ,TCF_EM_CMP , +TCF_EM_NBYTE , __TCF_EM_MAX };
include/linux/tc_ematch/tc_em_nbyte.h +13 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +#ifndef __LINUX_TC_EM_NBYTE_H +#define __LINUX_TC_EM_NBYTE_H + +#include <linux/pkt_cls.h> + +struct tcf_em_nbyte +{ +__u16 off; +__u16 len:12 ; +__u8 layer:4 ; +}; + +#endif
net/sched/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -408,6 +408,16 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called em_cmp. +config NET_EMATCH_NBYTE + tristate "Multi byte comparison" + depends on NET_EMATCH + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be able to classify packets based on + multiple byte comparisons mainly useful for IPv6 address comparisons. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called em_nbyte. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6) += cls_rsvp6.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE) += em_nbyte.o
net/sched/em_nbyte.c +82 -0
82 lines not on this page · raw message
PATCH 4/6 PKT_SCHED: u32 ematch
In reply to Thomas GrafThe u32 ematch behaves exactly the same as a u32 match and will replace it in the long term. It allows the underlying classifiers to give hints about the position of the next protocol header (i.e. nexthdr+).
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +1 -0
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@TCF_EM_CONTAINER ,TCF_EM_CMP ,TCF_EM_NBYTE , +TCF_EM_U32 , __TCF_EM_MAX };
include/net/pkt_cls.h +2 -0
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@*/ struct tcf_pkt_info { +unsigned char * ptr; +int nexthdr; };#ifdef CONFIG_NET_EMATCH
net/sched/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -418,6 +418,16 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called em_nbyte. +config NET_EMATCH_U32 + tristate "U32 hashing key" + depends on NET_EMATCH + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be able to classify packets using + the famous u32 key in combination with logic relations. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called em_u32. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -36,3 +36,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE) += em_nbyte.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_U32) += em_u32.o
net/sched/em_u32.c +58 -0
58 lines not on this page · raw message
Re: [PATCH 4/6] PKT_SCHED: u32 ematch
Quoted 30 lines · Thomas Graf
diff -Nru
linux-2.6.11-rc1-bk9.orig/net/sched/em_u32.clinux-2.6.11-rc1-bk9/net/sched/em_u32.cnet/sched/em_u32.c +24
-0@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/* +* net/sched/em_u32.c U32 Ematch +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License +* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version +* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +* +* Authors: Thomas Graf <[email protected]> +* Alexey Kuznetsov, <[email protected]> +* +* Based on net/sched/cls_u32.c +*/ + +#include <linux/config.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/skbuff.h> +#include <net/pkt_cls.h> + +static int em_u32_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch *em, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{
net/sched/em_u32.c line 34
Quoted 10 lines
net/sched/em_u32.c +10
-0+struct tc_u32_key *key = (struct tc_u32_key *) em->data; +unsigned char *ptr = skb->nh.raw; + +if (info) { +if (info->ptr) + ptr = info->ptr; + ptr += (info->nexthdr & key->offmask); + } + +return !((*(u32 *) (ptr + key->off) ^ key->val) & key->mask);
This needs to make sure it stays inside the skb. I know cls_u32's checks are pretty weak, but having nothing doesn't seem right.
Quoted 27 lines
net/sched/em_u32.c +24
-0+} + +static struct tcf_ematch_ops em_u32_ops = { + .kind =TCF_EM_U32 , + .datalen =sizeof (struct tc_u32_key ), + .match = em_u32_match, + .owner =THIS_MODULE , + .link =LIST_HEAD_INIT (em_u32_ops.link) +}; + +static int __init init_em_u32 (void ) +{ +return tcf_em_register (&em_u32_ops); +} + +static void __exit exit_em_u32(void) +{ +tcf_em_unregister (&em_u32_ops); +} + +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); + +module_init (init_em_u32); +module_exit (exit_em_u32);
Re: [PATCH 4/6] PKT_SCHED: u32 ematch
* Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 01:24
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines · Thomas Graf
net/sched/em_u32.c +9
-0+static int em_u32_match (struct sk_buff *skb,struct tcf_ematch *em, +struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ +struct tc_u32_key *key = (struct tc_u32_key *) em->data; +unsigned char *ptr = skb->nh.raw; + +if (info) { +if (info->ptr) + ptr = info->ptr;
Quoted 8 lines
net/sched/em_u32.c line 34
Quoted 6 lines
net/sched/em_u32.c +4
-0+ ptr += (info->nexthdr & key->offmask); + } + +return !((*(u32 *) (ptr + key->off) ^ key->val) & key->mask);This needs to make sure it stays inside the skb. I know cls_u32's checks are pretty weak, but having nothing doesn't seem right.
It's a exact copy with all the weaknesses inherited. I'll add a call to tcf_valid_offset, we'll lose the _feature_ to match areas in the page beyond the skb data though. ;->
PATCH RESEND 4/6 PKT_SCHED: u32 ematch
In reply to Thomas GrafResend with offset validation as Patrick suggested.
The u32 ematch behaves exactly the same as a u32 match and will replace it in the long term. It allows the underlying classifiers to give hints about the position of the next protocol header (i.e. nexthdr+).
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +1 -0
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@TCF_EM_CONTAINER ,TCF_EM_CMP ,TCF_EM_NBYTE , +TCF_EM_U32 , __TCF_EM_MAX };
include/net/pkt_cls.h +2 -0
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@*/ struct tcf_pkt_info { +unsigned char * ptr; +int nexthdr; };#ifdef CONFIG_NET_EMATCH
net/sched/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -418,6 +418,16 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called em_nbyte. +config NET_EMATCH_U32 + tristate "U32 hashing key" + depends on NET_EMATCH + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be able to classify packets using + the famous u32 key in combination with logic relations. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called em_u32. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -36,3 +36,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE) += em_nbyte.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_U32) += em_u32.o
net/sched/em_u32.c +63 -0
63 lines not on this page · raw message
PATCH 5/6 : PKT_SCHED: Metadata ematch (meta)
In reply to Thomas GrafThe meta ematch allows comparing various metadata values against static values from usersapce or other metadata values. It currently supports various numeric meta values such as netfilter mark, packet length, security level, interface indices, tc classid, load average, a random value but also variable length values such as interface names. Adding support for additional meta values is as easy as writing a data collector (usually 1-5 lines of code) and assign it to a id and type by putting it into the meta operations table.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +1 -0
@@ -386,6 +386,7 @@TCF_EM_CMP ,TCF_EM_NBYTE ,TCF_EM_U32 , +TCF_EM_META , __TCF_EM_MAX };
include/linux/tc_ematch/tc_em_meta.h +69 -0
69 lines not on this page · raw message
net/sched/Kconfig +11 -0
@@ -428,6 +428,17 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called em_u32. +config NET_EMATCH_META + tristate "Metadata" + depends on NET_EMATCH + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be ablt to classify packets based on + metadata such as load average, netfilter attributes, socket + attributes and routing decisions. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called em_meta. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE) += em_nbyte.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_U32) += em_u32.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_META) += em_meta.o
net/sched/em_meta.c +609 -0
609 lines not on this page · raw message
PATCH RESEND 5/6 : PKT_SCHED: Metadata ematch (meta)
RESEND: I gave up on trying to dump the meta configuration without TLVs, it gets
too complicated and error prone. Added dumping via TLVs.
The meta ematch allows comparing various metadata values against static values from usersapce or other metadata values. It currently supports various numeric meta values such as netfilter mark, packet length, security level, interface indices, tc classid, load average, a random value but also variable length values such as interface names. Adding support for additional meta values is as easy as writing a data collector (usually 1-5 lines of code) and assign it to a id and type by putting it into the meta operations table.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +1 -0
@@ -386,6 +386,7 @@TCF_EM_CMP ,TCF_EM_NBYTE ,TCF_EM_U32 , +TCF_EM_META , __TCF_EM_MAX };
include/linux/tc_ematch/tc_em_meta.h +69 -0
69 lines not on this page · raw message
net/sched/Kconfig +11 -0
@@ -428,6 +428,17 @@ To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called em_u32. +config NET_EMATCH_META + tristate "Metadata" + depends on NET_EMATCH + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be ablt to classify packets based on + metadata such as load average, netfilter attributes, socket + attributes and routing decisions. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called em_meta. + config NET_CLS_ACT bool "Packet ACTION" depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NET_CLS && NET_QOS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE) += em_nbyte.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_U32) += em_u32.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_META) += em_meta.o
net/sched/em_meta.c +661 -0
661 lines not on this page · raw message
PATCH 6/6 PKT_SCHED: Basic classifier
In reply to Thomas GrafThe basic classifier is the most simple classifier one can think of, it doesn't do anything on its own but to support extended matches and actions. A basic classifier returns true if no ematches or actions are configured and thus can also be used as a catch-all classifier.
include/linux/pkt_cls.h +14 -0
@@ -319,6 +319,20 @@#define TCA_TCINDEX_MAX (__TCA_TCINDEX_MAX - 1) +/* Basic filter */ + +enum +{ +TCA_BASIC_UNSPEC , +TCA_BASIC_CLASSID , +TCA_BASIC_EMATCHES , +TCA_BASIC_ACT , +TCA_BASIC_POLICE , + __TCA_BASIC_MAX +}; + +#define TCA_BASIC_MAX (__TCA_BASIC_MAX - 1) +/* Extended Matches */ struct tcf_ematch_tree_hdr
net/sched/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -269,6 +269,16 @@ Documentation and software is at <http://diffserv.sourceforge.net/>. +config NET_CLS_BASIC + tristate "Basic classifier" + depends on NET_CLS + ---help--- + Say Y here if you want to be able to classify packets using + only extended matches and actions. + + To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called cls_basic. + config NET_CLS_TCINDEX tristate "TC index classifier" depends on NET_CLS
net/sched/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP) += cls_rsvp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_TCINDEX) += cls_tcindex.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6) += cls_rsvp6.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_BASIC) += cls_basic.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH) += ematch.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP) += em_cmp.o obj-$(CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE) += em_nbyte.o
net/sched/cls_basic.c +303 -0
303 lines not on this page · raw message
* Thomas Graf <[email protected]> 2005-01-24 00:00
Quoted 3 lines
This patchset adds the ematch API, the ematches cmp, nbyte, u32, meta, and the basic classifier. It doesn't touch any existing code.
Summary about what is planned next regarding ematches:
The u32 classifier will get transformed to use the u32 ematch instead of its own. It will extend the u32 classifer to support logic expressions and combines hashing with the classifiction algorithms in the ematches. This has been dicussed already about 1-2 weeks ago. It will also make the u32 nfmark obsolete.
The indev match in cls_u32 and cls_fw is going to be removed, it is obsoleted by the meta ematch.
cls_fw is likely to be obsoleted by the meta ematch as well, it still has the advantage of the hashing over the ematch though.
A _very_ simple regular expression ematch.
Some kind of text search ematch, it is yet unclear wheter to make it stateful and maybe use the recent text search code in netfilter or make it stateless and simpler.
The meta ematch will be extended by the addition of more netfilter, socket, and routing attributes.
A "state" ematch allowing to limit classification on the first few packets of a connection and mark all further packets the same.
David S. Miller
maintainerQuoted 2 lines · On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:00:12 +0100 Thomas Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
This patchset adds the ematch API, the ematches cmp, nbyte, u32, meta, and the basic classifier. It doesn't touch any existing code.
I'm busy merging pure bug fixes, so I'll try to review this one soon. Likely it will go into 2.6.12, although I may try to sneak it into the pending 2.6.11 tree.
David S. Miller
maintainerQuoted 2 lines · On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:00:12 +0100 Thomas Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
This patchset adds the ematch API, the ematches cmp, nbyte, u32, meta, and the basic classifier. It doesn't touch any existing code.
All added to my net-2.6.12 pending tree. Thanks Thomas.