Fix mxcc warning
PATCH 1/1 Fix mxcc warning
Peter Jones uncovered this one while we were debugging the framebuffer issues. There are some references to -1 in the mxcc asm code, which should be 0xffffffff.
This patch gets rid of the -1s.
~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
include/asm-sparc/mxcc.h renamed from include/asm-sparc/mxcc.h.BAD +2 -2
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ extern __inline__ unsigned long mxcc_get {unsigned long mxcc_control; - __asm__ __volatile__("set -1, %%g2\n\t" -"set -1, %%g3\n\t" + __asm__ __volatile__("set 0xffffffff, %%g2\n\t" +"set 0xffffffff, %%g3\n\t" "stda %%g2, [%1] %2\n\t" "lda [%3] %2, %0\n\t" : "=r" (mxcc_control) :
David S. Miller
AppliedQuoted 7 lines · On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:25:19 -0600 "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <[email protected]>…
Peter Jones uncovered this one while we were debugging the framebuffer issues. There are some references to -1 in the mxcc asm code, which should be
0xffffffff.This patch gets rid of the -1s.
Signed-off-by Tom 'spot' Callaway <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.
I apologize for asking a silly question, but is this series of patches noted on this list being applied to the main 2.6.X kernel series or just to a separate patch set?
BTW, anytime someone believes a kernel may have a small chance of running ROSS HyperSparc SMP I'll be glad to compile and test.
Thanks
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 7 lines · On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:25:19 -0600 "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <[email protected]>…
Peter Jones uncovered this one while we were debugging the framebuffer issues. There are some references to -1 in the mxcc asm code, which should be
0xffffffff.This patch gets rid of the -1s.
Signed-off-by Tom 'spot' Callaway <[email protected]>Applied, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:09:26 -0400 Heitzso <[email protected]> wrote:
I apologize for asking a silly question, but is this series of patches noted on this list being applied to the main 2.6.X kernel series or just to a separate patch set?
It's upstream in the main 2.6.x kernel as of this morning.