acpi/video: check brightness is non-NULL before writing
PATCH 1/1 acpi/video: check brightness is non-NULL before writing
Hi Len, acpi-devel,
An easy to reproduce oops:
if
cat /proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness
reports <not supported>
and then one does
echo 1 > /proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness
the following oops will occur every time.
Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606058.981000] <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] c024a542 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] PREEMPT Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Modules linked in: dummy wlan_wep ath_pci ath_rate_sample wlan ath_hal Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] CPU: 0 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] EIP: 0060:[acpi_video_device_write_brightness+91/140] Tainted: P VLI Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.13) Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] EIP is at acpi_video_device_write_brightness+0x5b/0x8c Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] eax: 00000001 ebx: 00000001 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] esi: c1b62ec0 edi: 00000002 ebp: de191f74 esp: de191f64 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Process bash (pid: 406, threadinfo=de190000 task=e3012a80) Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Stack: 00000a31 c050e8e0 ea258e80 080eec08 de191f94 c015ff6c de191fa0 c050e8e0 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] 00000000 ea258e80 fffffff7 080eec08 de191fb4 c01600d1 de191fa0 00000000 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000002 de190000 c0103165 00000001 080eec08 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Call Trace: Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [show_stack+122/144] show_stack+0x7a/0x90 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [show_registers+342/448] show_registers+0x156/0x1c0 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [die+224/368] die+0xe0/0x170 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [do_page_fault+831/1674] do_page_fault+0x33f/0x68a Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [error_code+79/84] error_code+0x4f/0x54 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [vfs_write+172/352] vfs_write+0xac/0x160 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [sys_write+65/112] sys_write+0x41/0x70 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Code: ff 85 c0 b9 f2 ff ff ff 75 4a 8d 45 f0 31 c9 31 d2 c6 04 07 00 e8 9f 29 fd ff 83 f8 64 89 c3 b9 f2 ff ff ff 77 2e 8b 56 1c 31 c9 <3b> 4a 04 7d 22 8b 42 08 3b 1c 88 75 14 89 da 89 f0 e8 51 f8 ff
The following patch fixes the issue for me.
Description: acpi_video_device_brightness_seq_show() checks for both dev and dev->brightness to be non-NULL, but acpi_video_device_write_brightness() only checks if dev is non-NULL, leading to an easily reproducible oops. Checking for dev->brightness in the write routine fixes the problem.
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/acpi/video.c +1 -1
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ acpi_video_device_write_brightness (ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE ("acpi_video_device_write_brightness" ); -if (!dev || count +1 >sizeof str) +if (!dev || !dev->brightness || count +1 >sizeof str)return_VALUE (-EINVAL );if (copy_from_user (str, buffer, count))
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20050912184401.GC25471-r/[email protected]
PATCH 1/1 acpi/video: check brightness is non-NULL before writing
Quoted 42 lines · Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi Len, acpi-devel,
An easy to reproduce oops:
if
cat
/proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightnessreports <not supported>
and then one does
echo 1 >
/proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightnessthe following oops will occur every time.
Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606058.981000] <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] c024a542 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] PREEMPT Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Modules linked in: dummy wlan_wep ath_pci ath_rate_sample wlan ath_hal Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] CPU: 0 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] EIP: 0060:[acpi_video_device_write_brightness+91/140] Tainted: P VLI Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.13) Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] EIP is at acpi_video_device_write_brightness+0x5b/0x8c Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] eax: 00000001 ebx: 00000001 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] esi: c1b62ec0 edi: 00000002 ebp: de191f74 esp: de191f64 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Process bash (pid: 406, threadinfo=de190000 task=e3012a80) Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Stack: 00000a31 c050e8e0 ea258e80 080eec08 de191f94 c015ff6c de191fa0 c050e8e0 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] 00000000 ea258e80 fffffff7 080eec08 de191fb4 c01600d1 de191fa0 00000000 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000002 de190000 c0103165 00000001 080eec08 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Call Trace: Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [show_stack+122/144] show_stack+0x7a/0x90 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [show_registers+342/448] show_registers+0x156/0x1c0 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [die+224/368] die+0xe0/0x170 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [do_page_fault+831/1674] do_page_fault+0x33f/0x68a Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [error_code+79/84] error_code+0x4f/0x54 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [vfs_write+172/352] vfs_write+0xac/0x160 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [sys_write+65/112] sys_write+0x41/0x70 Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Sep 12 11:39:27 joust kernel: [4606313.261000] Code: ff 85 c0 b9 f2 ff ff ff 75 4a 8d 45 f0 31 c9 31 d2 c6 04 07 00 e8 9f 29 fd ff 83 f8 64 89 c3 b9 f2 ff ff ff 77 2e 8b 56 1c 31 c9 <3b> 4a 04 7d 22 8b 42 08 3b 1c 88 75 14 89 da 89 f0 e8 51 f8 ff
Quoted 1 line
The following patch fixes the issue for me.
Haven't heard anything for the past few months. Here's an updated patch for 2.6.15-rc1.
Thanks,
Nish
Description: acpi_video_device_brightness_seq_show() checks for both dev and dev->brightness to be non-NULL, but acpi_video_device_write_brightness() only checks if dev is non-NULL, leading to an easily reproducible oops. Checking for dev->brightness in the write routine fixes the problem.
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/acpi/video.c +1 -1
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ acpi_video_device_write_brightness(strucACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE ("acpi_video_device_write_brightness" ); -if (!dev || count +1 >sizeof str) +if (!dev || !dev->brightness || count +1 >sizeof str)return_VALUE (-EINVAL );if (copy_from_user (str, buffer, count))
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20051116204339.GK3122-r/[email protected]
Quoted 14 lines · Nishanth Aravamudan
Signed-off-by Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc-r/[email protected]>---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff -urpN
2.6.15-rc1/drivers/acpi/video.c2.6.15-rc1-dev/drivers/acpi/video.c---2.6.15-rc1/drivers/acpi/video.c2005-11-11 20:32:50.000000000 -0800 +++2.6.15-rc1-dev/drivers/acpi/video.c2005-11-16 12:40:42.000000000 -0800 @@
-812,7 +812,7 @@ acpi_video_device_write_brightness(struc
drivers/acpi/video.c acpi_video_device_write_brightness(struc · line 818
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/video.c +1
-1ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE ("acpi_video_device_write_brightness" ); -if (!dev || count +1 >sizeof str) +if (!dev || !dev->brightness || count +1 >sizeof str)return_VALUE (-EINVAL );if (copy_from_user (str, buffer, count))
Is it this http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5571?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 200511171430.16431.luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Quoted 17 lines · Luming
Quoted 16 lines · Nishanth Aravamudan
Signed-off-by Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc-r/[email protected]>---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff -urpN
2.6.15-rc1/drivers/acpi/video.c2.6.15-rc1-dev/drivers/acpi/video.c---2.6.15-rc1/drivers/acpi/video.c2005-11-11 20:32:50.000000000 -0800 +++2.6.15-rc1-dev/drivers/acpi/video.c2005-11-16 12:40:42.000000000 -0800 @@
-812,7 +812,7 @@ acpi_video_device_write_brightness(struc
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_video_device_write_brightness");
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/acpi/video.c acpi_video_device_write_brightness(struc · line 818
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/acpi/video.c +1
-1-if (!dev || count +1 >sizeof str) +if (!dev || !dev->brightness || count +1 >sizeof str)return_VALUE (-EINVAL );if (copy_from_user (str, buffer, count))Is it this http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5571?
Yup, sorry, didn't realize a bug had been opened. I submitted this patch to the list back in September and never heard back.
Thanks,
Nish
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click