Skip to contentSkip to conversation

skip initramfs check

PATCH In review Marcelo Tosatti 4 participants 7 messages Nov 17, 2005 – Nov 21, 2005 VFS

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 skip initramfs check

Hi,

The initramfs check at populate_rootfs() can consume significant time (several seconds) on slow/embedded platforms, since it has to decompress the image.

Add an option to skip it under CONFIG_EMBEDDED.

Is there a nicer way to achieve the same result?

init/Kconfig +10 -0
index ea097e0..a9d709e 100644
@@ -398,6 +398,16 @@ config CC_ALIGN_JUMPS
 	  no dummy operations need be executed.
 	  Zero means use compiler's default.
 
+config INITRAMFS_SKIP
+	bool "Skip initramfs verification of initrd" if EMBEDDED
+	default n
+	help
+	  By default the initialization code uncompresses the initrd image to 
+	  verify if it is a initramfs image. 
+
+	  Say Y here if you are sure not to be using initramfs and want to
+	  skip that test.
+
 endmenu		# General setup
 
 config TINY_SHMEM
init/initramfs.c +2 -0
index 0c5d9a3..92628b0 100644
@@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ void __init populate_rootfs(void)
 	if (initrd_start) {
 		int fd;
 		printk(KERN_INFO "checking if image is initramfs...");
+#ifndef CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SKIP
 		err = unpack_to_rootfs((char *)initrd_start,
 			initrd_end - initrd_start, 1);
 		if (!err) {
@@ -495,6 +496,7 @@ void __init populate_rootfs(void)
 			free_initrd();
 			return;
 		}
+#endif
 		printk("it isn't (%s); looks like an initrd\n", err);
 		fd = sys_open("/initrd.image", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT, 700);
 		if (fd >= 0) {
#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Marcelo Tosatti

The initramfs check at populate_rootfs() can consume significant time (several seconds) on slow/embedded platforms, since it has to decompress the image.

Add an option to skip it under CONFIG_EMBEDDED.

Is there a nicer way to achieve the same result?

I'd have thought that a __setup option would be preferable? Remove an ifdef, more flexible, and it's all __init code anyway.

#2 lore raw
In reply to Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 5 lines · Marcelo Tosatti

Hi,

The initramfs check at populate_rootfs() can consume significant time (several seconds) on slow/embedded platforms, since it has to decompress the image.

Query: is the problem that a big initramfs image is being unpacked more than once, or is unpacking an empty initramfs image (134 bytes) causing a significant delay?

I'm fairly certain that back in 1990 I could unzip 134 bytes on my 33 mhz 386 running dos in a fraction of a second. What's the use case here?

Rob

#3 lore raw

Hi Rob,

Quoted 10 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 5 lines · Marcelo Tosatti

Hi,

The initramfs check at populate_rootfs() can consume significant time (several seconds) on slow/embedded platforms, since it has to decompress the image.

Query: is the problem that a big initramfs image is being unpacked more than once, or is unpacking an empty initramfs image (134 bytes) causing a significant delay?

The problem is a big non-initramfs RAMDISK image (used for root mountpoint on this particular embedded platform), that is decompressed more than once:

- during the initramfs check, which fails because it is not initramfs.
- during the real RAMDISK decompression to memory.

Quoted 2 lines

I'm fairly certain that back in 1990 I could unzip 134 bytes on my 33 mhz 386 running dos in a fraction of a second. What's the use case here?

So the issue is not the empty initramfs image (which BTW could probably be made unecessary?), but a 10Mb RAMDISK image being decompressed by a 48Mhz PPC, which takes quite a few seconds.

Need to rework the patch to use a __setup option as Andrew suggested.

#4 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Marcelo Tosatti

Hi Rob,

Quoted 3 lines

Query: is the problem that a big initramfs image is being unpacked more than once, or is unpacking an empty initramfs image (134 bytes) causing a significant delay?

The problem is a big non-initramfs RAMDISK image (used for root mountpoint on this particular embedded platform), that is decompressed more than once:

- during the initramfs check, which fails because it is not initramfs.
- during the real RAMDISK decompression to memory.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I'm fairly certain that back in 1990 I could unzip 134 bytes on my 33 mhz 386 running dos in a fraction of a second. What's the use case here?

So the issue is not the empty initramfs image (which BTW could probably be made unecessary?), but a 10Mb RAMDISK image being decompressed by a 48Mhz PPC, which takes quite a few seconds.

Need to rework the patch to use a __setup option as Andrew suggested.

It sounds to me like is the initial check (which is just giving a thumbs up/thumbs down "is this an initramfs", correct?) only needs to decompress the first page or so of data to make this determination. A quick glance at the code seems to imply it's just checking the header and the first entry, so 4k should be plenty for that.

Some variant of lib/zlib_inflate... Ouch, bit of a mess there. Hey Matt: you know this area. Is it feasible to do some kind of:

deflate_init(whatever)
deflate_next_x_bytes(source *, dest *, length)

To grab a the first X bytes from the initramfs image?

Rob

#5 lore raw
Quoted 27 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 11 lines · Marcelo Tosatti

Hi Rob,

Quoted 3 lines

Query: is the problem that a big initramfs image is being unpacked more than once, or is unpacking an empty initramfs image (134 bytes) causing a significant delay?

The problem is a big non-initramfs RAMDISK image (used for root mountpoint on this particular embedded platform), that is decompressed more than once:

- during the initramfs check, which fails because it is not initramfs.
- during the real RAMDISK decompression to memory.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I'm fairly certain that back in 1990 I could unzip 134 bytes on my 33 mhz 386 running dos in a fraction of a second. What's the use case here?

So the issue is not the empty initramfs image (which BTW could probably be made unecessary?), but a 10Mb RAMDISK image being decompressed by a 48Mhz PPC, which takes quite a few seconds.

Need to rework the patch to use a __setup option as Andrew suggested.

It sounds to me like is the initial check (which is just giving a thumbs up/thumbs down "is this an initramfs", correct?) only needs to decompress the first page or so of data to make this determination. A quick glance at the code seems to imply it's just checking the header and the first entry, so 4k should be plenty for that.

Quoted 7 lines

Some variant of lib/zlib_inflate... Ouch, bit of a mess there. Hey Matt: you know this area. Is it feasible to do some kind of:

deflate_init(whatever)
deflate_next_x_bytes(source *, dest *, length)

To grab a the first X bytes from the initramfs image?

Not at the moment. But I think it is feasible to simply move the ramdisk detection and unpacking inside the ramfs state machine. In other words, add two new states:

- detecting type
- unpacking ramdisk

When the first few bytes are fed from the decompressor to the state machine, we either transition to the normal ramfs unpacking or we treat it as a ramdisk.

Signature · 1 line
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
#6 lore raw
Quoted 40 lines · Matt Mackall
Quoted 27 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 11 lines · Marcelo Tosatti

Hi Rob,

Quoted 3 lines

Query: is the problem that a big initramfs image is being unpacked more than once, or is unpacking an empty initramfs image (134 bytes) causing a significant delay?

The problem is a big non-initramfs RAMDISK image (used for root mountpoint on this particular embedded platform), that is decompressed more than once:

- during the initramfs check, which fails because it is not initramfs.
- during the real RAMDISK decompression to memory.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I'm fairly certain that back in 1990 I could unzip 134 bytes on my 33 mhz 386 running dos in a fraction of a second. What's the use case here?

So the issue is not the empty initramfs image (which BTW could probably be made unecessary?), but a 10Mb RAMDISK image being decompressed by a 48Mhz PPC, which takes quite a few seconds.

Need to rework the patch to use a __setup option as Andrew suggested.

It sounds to me like is the initial check (which is just giving a thumbs up/thumbs down "is this an initramfs", correct?) only needs to decompress the first page or so of data to make this determination. A quick glance at the code seems to imply it's just checking the header and the first entry, so 4k should be plenty for that.

Quoted 7 lines

Some variant of lib/zlib_inflate... Ouch, bit of a mess there. Hey Matt: you know this area. Is it feasible to do some kind of:

deflate_init(whatever)
deflate_next_x_bytes(source *, dest *, length)

To grab a the first X bytes from the initramfs image?

Not at the moment. But I think it is feasible to simply move the ramdisk detection and unpacking inside the ramfs state machine. In other words, add two new states:

Quoted 6 lines

- detecting type
- unpacking ramdisk

When the first few bytes are fed from the decompressor to the state machine, we either transition to the normal ramfs unpacking or we treat it as a ramdisk.

Yes that would be ideal.