Fix EISA/VLB/PCI network controllers alignment in menuconfig
PATCH 1/1 Fix EISA/VLB/PCI network controllers alignment in menuconfig
Hi Deepak, Russell, Jeff,
The CS89x0 Kconfig entry currently breaks the alignment of all "EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers" that follow it in menuconfig. This patch fixes it.
This bug was introduced in version 2.6.13-rc1. A first, different fix attempt was made by Deepak Saxena:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=712cb1ebb1653538527500165d8382ca48a7fca1
But it seems it was then overwritten by a subsequent (unsigned?) changeset from Russell King:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e399822da0f99f8486c33c47e7ae0d32151461e5
Whatever, Deepak's fix wasn't actually fixing the problem for me. I'm not sure my fix is correct (what exactly are the dependencies we want for this driver?) but at least it fixes the alignment problem. It would be nice if we could have this fix in 2.6.15, although it admittedly isn't critical.
This patch also fixes the module name in the help text, which was incorrect.
--- drivers/net/Kconfig | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/net/Kconfig +2 -2
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ config CS89x0 tristate "CS89x0 support" - depends on (NET_PCI && (ISA || ARCH_IXDP2X01)) || ARCH_PNX0105 + depends on NET_PCI && (ISA || ARCH_IXDP2X01 || ARCH_PNX0105) ---help--- Support for CS89x0 chipset based Ethernet cards. If you have a network (Ethernet) card of this type, say Y and read the
@@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ To compile this driver as a module, choose M here and read <file:Documentation/networking/net-modules.txt>. The module will be - called cs89x. + called cs89x0. config TC35815 tristate "TOSHIBA TC35815 Ethernet support"
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
Quoted 11 lines · Jean Delvare
The CS89x0
Kconfigentry currently breaks the alignment of all "EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers" that follow it in menuconfig. This patch fixes it.This bug was introduced in version 2.6.13-rc1. A first, different fix attempt was made by Deepak Saxena:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=712cb1ebb1653538527500165d8382ca48a7fca1But it seems it was then overwritten by a subsequent (unsigned?) changeset from Russell King:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e399822da0f99f8486c33c47e7ae0d32151461e5
It shouldn't have been overwritten - it's probably the result of a mis-merge. I would appear that Deepak's change went in via one tree and mine via my own tree.
As far as that change being unsigned, I don't see why the removal of a previous addition would require a Sign-off. We never signed-off for undoing BK changesets so I'm merely following the established modus operandi.
I have no view on your patch since I never use any of the config tools apart from oldconfig.
Signature · 3 lines
Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
Hi Russell,
Quoted 13 lines · Jean Delvare
Quoted 11 lines
The CS89x0
Kconfigentry currently breaks the alignment of all "EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers" that follow it in menuconfig. This patch fixes it.This bug was introduced in version 2.6.13-rc1. A first, different fix attempt was made by Deepak Saxena:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=712cb1ebb1653538527500165d8382ca48a7fca1But it seems it was then overwritten by a subsequent (unsigned?) changeset from Russell King:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e399822da0f99f8486c33c47e7ae0d32151461e5
Quoted 8 lines
It shouldn't have been overwritten - it's probably the result of a mis-merge. I would appear that Deepak's change went in via one tree and mine via my own tree.
As far as that change being unsigned, I don't see why the removal of a previous addition would require a Sign-off. We never signed-off for undoing BK changesets so I'm merely following the established modus operandi.
Given the original meaning of these "Signed-off-by" lines (certifying that the added code belongs to the sender), it certainly makes sense. However, we tend to now use these lines for a second meaning, which is tracing all approvers of the patch from the author to the committer. For that second meaning, signing reverts may make sense.
Quoted 2 lines
I have no view on your patch since I never use any of the config tools apart from oldconfig.
Well, oldconfig is affected by the alignment bug as well. Try deleting the lines of a few drivers depending on NET_PCI and placed after CS89x0 in .config (e.g. CONFIG_DGRS) and run "make oldconfig", you'll see it.
Aside from the alignment bug, what I really need to know is if the new dependency expression I came up with it OK:
NET_PCI && (ISA || ARCH_IXDP2X01 || ARCH_PNX0105)
If it is, then I guess that there is no point discussing any further and the patch can be applied.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare