zfcp: transport class adaptations II
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 zfcp: transport class adaptations II
This patch replaces my patch from 2006-01-05
"zfcp: use fc_host attributes physical_port_name and physical_port_id"
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113645196121540&w=2
It depends on following patches
zfcp: handle unsolicited status notification lost
zfcp: transport class adaptations
fc transport: add permanent_port_name fc_host attribute
Please apply.
Regards,
Andreas
zfcp: transport class adaptations II
Replaced zfcp adapter attributes with fc_host attributes:fc_topology by port_type, physical_wwpn by permanent_port_name. Make use of fc_host attribute supported_speeds. Removed zfcp adapter attribute physical_s_id.
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h | 1 - drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c | 2 + drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++---------------- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h | 1 - drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c | 3 ++ drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_adapter.c | 11 ------- 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
4fe5c0d2b1953543c64c462ed5ad2b6de77747be
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h +0 -1
@@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ struct zfcp_adapter {u32 physical_s_id;/* local FC port ID */ struct ccw_device *ccw_device;/* S/390 ccw device */ u8 fc_service_class; -u32 fc_topology;/* FC topology */ u32 hydra_version;/* Hydra version */ u32 fsf_lic_version;u32 adapter_features;/* FCP channel features */
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c +1 -1
@@ -2613,7 +2613,7 @@ zfcp_erp_port_strategy_open_common(struccase ZFCP_ERP_STEP_UNINITIALIZED :case ZFCP_ERP_STEP_PHYS_PORT_CLOSING :case ZFCP_ERP_STEP_PORT_CLOSING : -if (adapter->fc_topology ==FSF_TOPO_P2P ) { +if (fc_host_port_type (adapter->scsi_host) ==FC_PORTTYPE_PTP ) {if (port->wwpn != adapter->peer_wwpn) {ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL ("Failed to open port 0x%016Lx " "on adapter %s.\nPeer WWPN "
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +25 -24
95 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h +0 -1
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@#define FSF_TOPO_P2P 0x00000001#define FSF_TOPO_FABRIC 0x00000002#define FSF_TOPO_AL 0x00000003 -#define FSF_TOPO_FABRIC_VIRT 0x00000004/* data direction for FCP commands */ #define FSF_DATADIR_WRITE 0x00000001
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c +3 -0
@@ -865,13 +865,16 @@ struct fc_function_template zfcp_transpo .show_rport_supported_classes = 1, .show_host_node_name = 1, .show_host_port_name = 1, + .show_host_permanent_port_name = 1, .show_host_supported_classes = 1, + .show_host_supported_speeds = 1, .show_host_maxframe_size = 1, .show_host_serial_number = 1, .get_fc_host_stats = zfcp_get_fc_host_stats, .reset_fc_host_stats = zfcp_reset_fc_host_stats,/* no functions registered for following dynamic attributes but directly set by LLDD */ + .show_host_port_type = 1, .show_host_speed = 1, .show_host_port_id = 1, };
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_adapter.c +0 -11
@@ -33,14 +33,6 @@#define ZFCP_LOG_AREA ZFCP_LOG_AREA_CONFIG -static const char fc_topologies[5 ][25 ] = { -"<error>" , -"point-to-point" , -"fabric" , -"arbitrated loop" , -"fabric (virt. adapter)" -}; -/** * ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR * @_name: name of show attribute
@@ -69,8 +61,6 @@ ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR(physical_wwpn,ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR (physical_s_id,"0x%06x\n" , adapter->physical_s_id);ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR (card_version,"0x%04x\n" , adapter->hydra_version);ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR (lic_version,"0x%08x\n" , adapter->fsf_lic_version); -ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR (fc_topology,"%s\n" , - fc_topologies[adapter->fc_topology]);ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR (hardware_version,"0x%08x\n" , adapter->hardware_version); ZFCP_DEFINE_ADAPTER_ATTR(in_recovery, "%d\n", atomic_test_mask
@@ -257,7 +247,6 @@ static struct attribute *zfcp_adapter_at &dev_attr_physical_s_id.attr, &dev_attr_card_version.attr, &dev_attr_lic_version.attr, - &dev_attr_fc_topology.attr, &dev_attr_status.attr, &dev_attr_hardware_version.attr,NULL
Signature · 1 line
0.99.9n-g5a22
Quoted 10 lines · Andreas Herrmann
This patch replaces my patch from 2006-01-05
"zfcp: usefc_hostattributesphysical_port_nameandphysical_port_id"
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113645196121540&w=2It depends on following patches
zfcp: handle unsolicited status notification lost
zfcp: transport class adaptations
fc transport: addpermanent_port_namefc_hostattributePlease apply.
looks good. btw, does zfcp now always have rports as parents for targets so we can remove the special case in fc_target_setup?
Quoted 2 lines · On 13.01.2006 19:12 Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
btw, does zfcp now always have rports as parents for targets so we can remove the special case in
fc_target_setup?
If you mean the initialisation to "known non-values". I think this is not needed by zfcp.
In fact beginning with 2.6.13 or so I was forced to introduce rports to zfcp because _scsi_add_device did not work otherwise.
I guess you also mean that the get_starget##field stuff can be removed from fc_starget_show_function?
Or why would we need those get_starget functions if information is received from rports and the functions are not used somewhere else.
This may affect lpfc and qla2xxx, too.
Regards,
Andreas