do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
Kconfig currently allows compiling IPW_2100 and IPW_2200 into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.
Is there better way of creating N/m config option?
drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig +7 -2
@@ -144,9 +144,14 @@ config PCMCIA_RAYCS comment "Wireless 802.11b ISA/PCI cards support" depends on NET_RADIO && (ISA || PCI || PPC_PMAC || PCMCIA) + +config MODULE_ONLY + tristate + default m + config IPW2100 tristate "Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Connection" - depends on NET_RADIO && PCI + depends on NET_RADIO && PCI && MODULE_ONLY select FW_LOADER select IEEE80211 ---help---
@@ -200,7 +205,7 @@ config IPW2100_DEBUG config IPW2200 tristate "Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG and 2915ABG Network Connection" - depends on NET_RADIO && PCI + depends on NET_RADIO && PCI && MODULE_ONLY select FW_LOADER select IEEE80211 ---help---
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Machek
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.
False, initramfs...
Quoted 7 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Machek
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.False, initramfs...
which would warrant some extra documentation in Kconfig explaining that this driver needs initramfs with firmware for it to work when compiled in the kernel. A link to the ipw2x00 documentation might also help.
Cheers,
Auke
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Auke Kok <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:29:30 -0700
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Machek
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
False, initramfs...
which would warrant some extra documentation in
Kconfigexplaining that this driver needs initramfs with firmware for it to work when compiled in the kernel. A link to the ipw2x00 documentation might also help.
Besides, the initramfs runs long after the driver init routine runs which is when the firmware needs to be available.
Quoted 10 lines · David Miller
From: Auke Kok <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:29:30 -0700Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Machek
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
False, initramfs...
which would warrant some extra documentation in
Kconfigexplaining that this driver needs initramfs with firmware for it to work when compiled in the kernel. A link to the ipw2x00 documentation might also help.Besides, the initramfs runs long after the driver init routine runs which is when the firmware needs to be available.
.. unless you use sysfs to do a fake hotunplug + replug the device, at which point the driver init routine runs again.
Quoted 5 lines · Arjan van de Ven
Quoted 2 lines
Besides, the initramfs runs long after the driver init routine runs which is when the firmware needs to be available.
.. unless you use sysfs to do a fake hotunplug + replug the device, at which point the driver init routine runs again.
Can we document how to do that? I've wanted to synthesize such
things before, and I couldn't quite reason how.
In my case, I had RHEL4 module-init-tools that don't wait for
modprobe, so I had to compile in scsi and qla2x00, but the qla2x00 needs firmware, and it's too early...etc.
Joel
Signature · 10 lines
"Baby, even the losers Get luck sometimes. Even the losers Keep a little bit of pride." Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (650) 506-8127
Quoted 9 lines · Joel Becker
Quoted 5 lines · Arjan van de Ven
Quoted 2 lines
Besides, the initramfs runs long after the driver init routine runs which is when the firmware needs to be available.
.. unless you use sysfs to do a fake hotunplug + replug the device, at which point the driver init routine runs again.
Can we document how to do that? I've wanted to synthesize such
things before, and I couldn't quite reason how.
just load fakephp
then do
echo -n 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/0000:04:02.1/power
this hotunplugs it (fake)
then just do
echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/0000:04:02.0/power
(or any other device on the 04 bus) and the kernel finds the 04:02.1 device again...
Quoted 1 line · Arjan van de Ven
just load fakephp
Thanks! I'd never heard of it :-)
Joel
Signature · 8 lines
"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it."
- Oscar Wilde
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127Hi!
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.False, initramfs...
which would warrant some extra documentation in
Kconfigexplaining that this driver needs initramfs with firmware for it to work when compiled in the kernel. A link to the ipw2x00 documentation might also help.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Besides, the initramfs runs long after the driver init routine runs which is when the firmware needs to be available.
.. unless you use sysfs to do a fake hotunplug + replug the device, at which point the driver init routine runs again.
Ouch, nice trick. But how do I actually pull it up? There's nothing that looks like allowing that in /sys:
root@amd:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:02.0# ls broken_parity_status config irq power/ subsystem@ uevent bus@ device local_cpus resource subsystem_device vendor class enable modalias resource0 subsystem_vendor root@amd:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:02.0#
I tried going to bus/drivers/ and unbind/rebind ipw2200 driver; that does not work. I tried echo 0 > enable; echo 1 > enable, but no trick, either.
Pavel
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Quoted 16 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.False, initramfs...
which would warrant some extra documentation in
Kconfigexplaining that this driver needs initramfs with firmware for it to work when compiled in the kernel. A link to the ipw2x00 documentation might also help.Besides, the initramfs runs long after the driver init routine runs which is when the firmware needs to be available.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
.. unless you use sysfs to do a fake hotunplug + replug the device, at which point the driver init routine runs again.
Ouch, nice trick. But how do I actually pull it up? There's nothing that looks like allowing that in /sys:
root@amd:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:02.0# ls
/sys/bus/pci/slots/0000:04:02.1
need to go there via bus/pci/slots
Quoted 7 lines · you
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Machek
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.False, initramfs...
Does the ipw driver _really_ need the firmware on insmod time? bcm43xx, for example, loads the firmware on "ifconfig up" time. If ipw really needs the firmware on insmod, is it possible to defer it to later at "ifconfig up" time?
Signature · 1 line
Greetings Michael.
Quoted 4 lines · Michael Buesch
Does the ipw driver _really_ need the firmware on insmod time? bcm43xx, for example, loads the firmware on "ifconfig up" time. If ipw really needs the firmware on insmod, is it possible to defer it to later at "ifconfig up" time?
Is bcm43xx able to get the MAC address before the firmware is loaded?
Last time I checked, if the MAC address is only discovered after the interface is created (as would be the case with ipw loading firmware on ifconfig up, I think), interface renaming does not work.
Daniel
Quoted 7 lines · you
Quoted 4 lines · Michael Buesch
Does the ipw driver _really_ need the firmware on insmod time? bcm43xx, for example, loads the firmware on "ifconfig up" time. If ipw really needs the firmware on insmod, is it possible to defer it to later at "ifconfig up" time?
Is bcm43xx able to get the MAC address before the firmware is loaded?
Yes. We have a PROM that is readable without firmware. (And we actually do this and did it forever. So I don't know where your assumption comes from ;) )
Quoted 3 lines
Last time I checked, if the MAC address is only discovered after the interface is created (as would be the case with ipw loading firmware on ifconfig up, I think), interface renaming does not work.
Signature · 1 line
Greetings Michael.
Quoted 3 lines · Michael Buesch
Yes. We have a PROM that is readable without firmware. (And we actually do this and did it forever. So I don't know where your assumption comes from ;) )
It wasn't an assumption: I was stating something about the Intel cards. It is not possible to determine the MAC address for ipw2100/ipw2200 until the firmware is loaded.
Daniel
Quoted 7 lines · Michael Buesch
Quoted 6 lines · you
Quoted 4 lines · Pavel Machek
Kconfigcurrently allows compilingIPW_2100andIPW_2200into kernel (not as a module). Unfortunately, such configuration does not work, because these drivers need a firmware, and it can't be loaded by userspace loader when userspace is not running.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
False, initramfs...
Does the ipw driver _really_ need the firmware on insmod time? bcm43xx, for example, loads the firmware on "ifconfig up" time. If ipw really needs the firmware on insmod, is it possible to defer it to later at "ifconfig up" time?
Probably not. This (very dirty) hack implements that (with some level of success -- ifconfig down/ifconfig up is enough to get wireless working).
Pavel
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c +13 -1
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@static int bt_coexist =0 ;static int hwcrypto =0 ;static int roaming =1 ; +static int needs_reinit =1 ;static const char ipw_modes[] = {'a' ,'b' ,'g' ,'?' };
@@ -10013,10 +10014,20 @@ sys_config->silence_threshold =0x1e ; } +static int ipw_pci_suspend (struct pci_dev *pdev,pm_message_t state); +static int ipw_pci_resume (struct pci_dev *pdev); +static int ipw_net_open (struct net_device *dev) {struct ipw_priv *priv =ieee80211_priv (dev);IPW_DEBUG_INFO ("dev->open\n" ); + +if (needs_reinit) { +printk ("ipw: Delayed loading the firmware\n" ); +ipw_pci_suspend (priv->pci_dev,PMSG_FREEZE ); +ipw_pci_resume (priv->pci_dev); + } +/* we should be verifying the device is ready to be opened */ mutex_lock (&priv->mutex); if (!(priv->status & STATUS_RF_KILL_MASK) &&
@@ -11295,7 +11306,8 @@if (ipw_up (priv)) {mutex_unlock (&priv->mutex); -return -EIO ; + needs_reinit =1 ; +return 0 ; }mutex_unlock (&priv->mutex);
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Quoted 3 lines · Pavel Machek
Probably not. This (very dirty) hack implements that (with some level of success -- ifconfig down/ifconfig up is enough to get wireless working).
You just need to
$ iwpriv ethX reset
Thanks,
-yi
Quoted 8 lines · Zhu Yi
Quoted 3 lines · Pavel Machek
Probably not. This (very dirty) hack implements that (with some level of success -- ifconfig down/ifconfig up is enough to get wireless working).
You just need to
$ iwpriv ethX reset
I presume that this is sufficient, and I can drop this thread (except the comment cleanup patch)?
John
Signature · 2 lines
John W. Linville [email protected]
PATCH 1/1 cleanup // comments from ipw2200
In reply to Michael Bueschipw2200 uses // comments, and uses them for removing unneeded code. Clean it up a bit.
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c +4 -25
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ static void ipw_fw_dma_abort(struct ipw_IPW_DEBUG_FW (">> :\n" ); -//set the Stop and Abort bit +/* set the Stop and Abort bit */ control =DMA_CONTROL_SMALL_CB_CONST_VALUE |DMA_CB_STOP_AND_ABORT ;ipw_write_reg32 (priv,IPW_DMA_I_DMA_CONTROL , control); priv->sram_desc.last_cb_index =0 ;
@@ -3002,8 +3002,6 @@ static int ipw_load_ucode(struct ipw_priif (rc <0 )return rc; -// spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags); -for (addr =IPW_SHARED_LOWER_BOUND ; addr <IPW_REGISTER_DOMAIN1_END ; addr +=4 ) {ipw_write32 (priv, addr,0 );
@@ -3097,8 +3095,6 @@ static int ipw_load_ucode(struct ipw_prifirmware have problem getting alive resp. */ ipw_write_reg8 (priv,IPW_BASEBAND_CONTROL_STATUS ,0 ); -// spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); -return rc; }
@@ -6387,13 +6383,6 @@ static int ipw_wx_set_genie(struct net_d (wrqu->data.length && extra == NULL))return -EINVAL ; -//mutex_lock(&priv->mutex); - -//if (!ieee->wpa_enabled) { -// err = -EOPNOTSUPP; -// goto out; -//} -if (wrqu->data.length) { buf =kmalloc (wrqu->data.length,GFP_KERNEL );if (buf ==NULL ) {
@@ -6413,7 +6402,6 @@ static int ipw_wx_set_genie(struct net_dipw_wpa_assoc_frame (priv, ieee->wpa_ie, ieee->wpa_ie_len); out: -//mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex); return err; }
@@ -6426,13 +6414,6 @@ static int ipw_wx_get_genie(struct net_dstruct ieee80211_device *ieee = priv->ieee;int err =0 ; -//mutex_lock(&priv->mutex); - -//if (!ieee->wpa_enabled) { -// err = -EOPNOTSUPP; -// goto out; -//} -if (ieee->wpa_ie_len ==0 || ieee->wpa_ie ==NULL ) { wrqu->data.length =0 ; goto out;
@@ -6447,7 +6428,6 @@ static int ipw_wx_get_genie(struct net_dmemcpy (extra, ieee->wpa_ie, ieee->wpa_ie_len); out: -//mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex); return err; }
@@ -6558,7 +6538,6 @@ static int ipw_wx_set_auth(struct net_de ieee->ieee802_1x = param->value;break ; -//case IW_AUTH_ROAMING_CONTROL: case IW_AUTH_PRIVACY_INVOKED : ieee->privacy_invoked = param->value;break ;
@@ -6680,7 +6659,7 @@ static int ipw_wx_set_mlme(struct net_deswitch (mlme->cmd) {case IW_MLME_DEAUTH : -// silently ignore +/* silently ignore */ break ;case IW_MLME_DISASSOC :
@@ -9766,7 +9745,7 @@ static int ipw_wx_set_monitor(struct netreturn 0 ; } -#endif // CONFIG_IPW2200_MONITOR +#endif /* CONFIG_IPW2200_MONITOR */ static int ipw_wx_reset(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
@@ -10009,7 +9988,7 @@ static void init_sys_config(struct ipw_ sys_config->dot11g_auto_detection =0 ; sys_config->enable_cts_to_self =0 ; sys_config->bt_coexist_collision_thr =0 ; - sys_config->pass_noise_stats_to_host =1 ;//1 -- fix for 256 + sys_config->pass_noise_stats_to_host =1 ;/* 1 -- fix for 256 */ sys_config->silence_threshold =0x1e ; }
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Review
Quoted 6 lines
Is there better way of creating N/m config option?
config IPW2100
tristate "Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Connection"(quoted diff) +1
-1- depends on NET_RADIO && PCI + depends on NET_RADIO && PCI && MODULE_ONLY
"depends on NET_RADIO && PCI && m"
Jan Engelhardt