rtc-omap, rtc framework driver
Subsystems (5)
PATCH 1/1 rtc-omap, rtc framework driver
Cleaning out my patch queue ... here's an "rtc class" driver. Much more suitable for upstream merging than the previous version, even though that code has gotten much cleaner over time.
Could someone confirm that this RTC can't actually do system wakeups without external hardware support? My documentation isn't at all clear on that issue. There's certainly an external wakeup signal available, but text also says that the alarm irq should work the normal way ... but I don't see that happening. It could easily be just a bug in enable_irq_wakeup(INT_RTC_ALARM) handling, which ISTR looked like a big NOP last I checked (for almost all IRQs).
Also, someone with an OMAP2 setup should confirm that the Kconfig is right, and this particular controller isn't provided on OMAP2. That certainly matches the lack of RTC in the .../mach-omap2 directory, but the TI website says 2420 (but not {2,3}430) has an RTC. Maybe the OMAP 2420 support is just missing, and it's really the same RTC...
- Dave
This creates a new RTC-framework driver for the RTC/calendar module found in various OMAP chips, giving a more correct/standard replacement for the older drivers/char/omap-rtc.c driver. Differences include:
- much smaller/simpler, because it reuses shared infrastructure
- the RTC name will normally be "rtc0" not "rtc"
- the /dev node has a different major and minor numbers
- RTC_ALM_SET handled as on PCs (alarm within 24 hours)
- RTC_WKALM_SET handled as on PCs (alarm within this century)
- epoch not changeable (why bother)
- rtc alarm may optionally be a system wakeup event (board-specific)
If you use udev and statically link this, some init script can just create a symbolic link (rtc -> rtc0) so tools like "hwclock" will work as usual. Or, updates to hwclock (and busybox) are available which teach it to use the /dev/rtc0 path as a backup, and to support "hwclock --file=/dev/rtc0".
----
Presumably an upstream merge should remove the devices.c support for the older non-framework driver.
arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c | 2 drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 8 drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 573 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rtc/Kconfig +8 -0
@@ -151,6 +151,14 @@ config RTC_DRV_DS1742 This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called rtc-ds1742. +config RTC_DRV_OMAP + tristate "TI OMAP1" + depends on RTC_CLASS && ( \ + ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX || ARCH_OMAP730 ) + help + Say "yes" here to support the real time clock on TI OMAP1 chips. + This driver can also be built as a module called rtc-omap. + config RTC_DRV_PCF8563 tristate "Philips PCF8563/Epson RTC8564" depends on RTC_CLASS && I2C
arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c +1 -1
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ -#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_RTC ) || defined(CONFIG_OMAP_RTC ) +#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_RTC ) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP ) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP_MODULE )#define OMAP_RTC_BASE 0xfffb4800
drivers/rtc/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST) += rtc-test.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307) += rtc-ds1307.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672) += rtc-ds1672.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1742) += rtc-ds1742.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP) += rtc-omap.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8563) += rtc-pcf8563.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8583) += rtc-pcf8583.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RS5C372) += rtc-rs5c372.o
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +573 -0
573 lines not on this page · raw message
Hi Dave,
For OMAP2 and OMAP3, the RTC is in the Power Management companion chip (TWL92230 and TWL4030).
Where do you see an RTC on the web site for OMAP2420? The only picture I see shows the RTC in the companion chip.
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=
6123&navigationId=11990&contentId=4671
Regards,
Steve
Quoted 712 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Brownell
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [patch 2.6.17-rc4-omap-git] rtc-omap, rtc framework driverCleaning out my patch queue ... here's an "rtc class" driver.
Much more suitable for upstream merging than the previous
version, even though that code has gotten much cleaner over time.Could someone confirm that this RTC can't actually do system wakeups without external hardware support? My documentation isn't at all clear on that issue. There's certainly an external wakeup signal available, but text also says that the alarm irq should work the normal way ... but I don't see that happening. It could easily be just a bug in
enable_irq_wakeup(INT_RTC_ALARM)handling, which ISTR looked like a big NOP last I checked (for almost all IRQs).Also, someone with an OMAP2 setup should confirm that the
Kconfigis right, and this particular controller isn't provided on OMAP2. That certainly matches the lack of RTC in the .../mach-omap2 directory, but the TI website says 2420 (but not {2,3}430) has an RTC. Maybe the OMAP 2420 support is just missing, and it's really the same RTC...- Dave
This creates a new RTC-framework driver for the RTC/calendar module found in various OMAP chips, giving a more correct/standard replacement for the older
drivers/char/omap-rtc.cdriver. Differences include:- much smaller/simpler, because it reuses shared infrastructure
- the RTC name will normally be "rtc0" not "rtc"
- the /dev node has a different major and minor numbers
-RTC_ALM_SEThandled as on PCs (alarm within 24 hours)
-RTC_WKALM_SEThandled as on PCs (alarm within this century)
- epoch not changeable (why bother)
- rtc alarm may optionally be a system wakeup event (board-specific)If you use udev and statically link this, some init script can just create a symbolic link (rtc -> rtc0) so tools like "hwclock" will work as usual.
Or, updates to hwclock (and busybox) are available which teach it to use the/dev/rtc0path as a backup, and to support "hwclock --file=/dev/rtc0".Signed-off-by David Brownell <[email protected]>----
Presumably an upstream merge should remove thedevices.csupport for the older non-framework driver.arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c | 2 drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 8 drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 573 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)Index: omap-2.6/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- omap-2.6.orig/drivers/rtc/Kconfig 2006-08-07
20:53:03.000000000 -0700
+++ omap-2.6/drivers/rtc/Kconfig 2006-08-15
08:40:06.000000000 -0700drivers/rtc/Kconfig +6
-0@@ -151,6 +151,14 @@ config RTC_DRV_DS1742 This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called rtc-ds1742. +config RTC_DRV_OMAP + tristate "TI OMAP1" + depends on RTC_CLASS && ( \ + ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX || ARCH_OMAP730 ) + help + Say "yes" here to support the real time clock on TIOMAP1 chips.
drivers/rtc/Kconfig +2
-0+ This driver can also be built as a module called rtc-omap. + config RTC_DRV_PCF8563 tristate "Philips PCF8563/Epson RTC8564" depends on RTC_CLASS && I2CIndex:
omap-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c
===================================================================
---omap-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c2006-08-07 20:50:44.000000000 -0700+++
omap-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c2006-08-15
08:40:06.000000000 -0700(quoted diff) +2
-2@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ /*------------------------------------------------------------ -------------*/ -#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_RTC) || defined(CONFIG_OMAP_RTC) +#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_RTC) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP) || +defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP_MODULE)#define
OMAP_RTC_BASE0xfffb4800Index: omap-2.6/drivers/rtc/Makefile
===================================================================
--- omap-2.6.orig/drivers/rtc/Makefile 2006-08-07
20:53:03.000000000 -0700
+++ omap-2.6/drivers/rtc/Makefile 2006-08-15
08:40:49.000000000 -0700drivers/rtc/Makefile +1
-0@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST) += rtc-test.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307) += rtc-ds1307.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672) += rtc-ds1672.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1742) += rtc-ds1742.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP) += rtc-omap.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8563) += rtc-pcf8563.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8583) += rtc-pcf8583.o obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RS5C372) += rtc-rs5c372.oIndex:
omap-2.6/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
===================================================================drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +0
-008:40:06.000000000 -0700
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +92
-0@@ -0,0 +1,573 @@ +/* +* TI OMAP1 Real Time Clock interface for Linux +* +* Copyright (C) 2003 MontaVista Software, Inc. +* Author: George G. Davis <[email protected]> or <[email protected]> +* +* Copyright (C) 2006 David Brownell (new RTC framework) +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License +* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version +* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +*/ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/ioport.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/rtc.h> +#include <linux/bcd.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +#include <asm/io.h> +#include <asm/mach/time.h> + + +/* The OMAP1 RTC is a year/month/day/hours/minutes/seconds BCD clock +* with century-range alarm matching, driven by the 32kHz clock. +* +* The main user-visible ways it differs from PC RTCs are by omitting +* "don't care" alarm fields and sub-second periodic IRQs, and having +* an autoadjust mechanism to calibrate to the true oscillator rate. +* +* Board-specific wiring options include using split power mode with +* RTC_OFF_NOFF used as the reset signal (so the RTC won't be reset), +* and wiring RTC_WAKE_INT (so the RTC alarm can wake the system from +* low power modes). See the BOARD-SPECIFIC CUSTOMIZATION comment. +*/ + +#define OMAP_RTC_BASE 0xfffb4800 + +/* RTC registers */ +#define OMAP_RTC_SECONDS_REG 0x00 +#define OMAP_RTC_MINUTES_REG 0x04 +#define OMAP_RTC_HOURS_REG 0x08 +#define OMAP_RTC_DAYS_REG 0x0C +#define OMAP_RTC_MONTHS_REG 0x10 +#define OMAP_RTC_YEARS_REG 0x14 +#define OMAP_RTC_WEEKS_REG 0x18 + +#define OMAP_RTC_ALARM_SECONDS_REG 0x20 +#define OMAP_RTC_ALARM_MINUTES_REG 0x24 +#define OMAP_RTC_ALARM_HOURS_REG 0x28 +#define OMAP_RTC_ALARM_DAYS_REG 0x2c +#define OMAP_RTC_ALARM_MONTHS_REG 0x30 +#define OMAP_RTC_ALARM_YEARS_REG 0x34 + +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_REG 0x40 +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG 0x44 +#define OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG 0x48 + +#define OMAP_RTC_COMP_LSB_REG 0x4c +#define OMAP_RTC_COMP_MSB_REG 0x50 +#define OMAP_RTC_OSC_REG 0x54 + +/* OMAP_RTC_CTRL_REG bit fields: */ +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_SPLIT (1<<7) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_DISABLE (1<<6) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_SET_32_COUNTER (1<<5) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_TEST (1<<4) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_MODE_12_24 (1<<3) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_AUTO_COMP (1<<2) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_ROUND_30S (1<<1) +#define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_STOP (1<<0) + +/* OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG bit fields: */ +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_POWER_UP (1<<7) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_ALARM (1<<6) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_1D_EVENT (1<<5) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_1H_EVENT (1<<4) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_1M_EVENT (1<<3) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_1S_EVENT (1<<2) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_RUN (1<<1) +#define OMAP_RTC_STATUS_BUSY (1<<0) + +/* OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG bit fields: */ +#define OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM (1<<3) +#define OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_TIMER (1<<2) + + +#define rtc_read (addr)
omap_readb(OMAP_RTC_BASE + (addr))drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +4
-0+#define rtc_write (val, addr) omap_writeb(val, OMAP_RTC_BASE + (addr)) + + +/* platform_bus isn't hotpluggable, so for static linkage it'd be safe
+ * to get rid ofprobe()andremove()code ... too bad the driverdrivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +53
-0+struct +* remembers probe(), that's about 25% of the runtime footprint!! +*/ +#ifndef MODULE +#undef __devexit +#undef __devexit_p +#define __devexit __exit +#define __devexit_p __exit_p +#endif + + +/* we rely on the rtc framework to handle locking (rtc->ops_lock), +* so the only other requirement is that register accesses which +* require BUSY to be clear are made with IRQs locally disabled */ +static void rtc_wait_not_busy (void ) { +int count =0 ; +u8 status; + +/* BUSY may stay active for 1/32768 second (~30 usec) */ +for (count =0 ; count <50 ; count++) { + status =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG ); +if ((status & (u8 )OMAP_RTC_STATUS_BUSY ) ==0 ) +break ; +udelay (1 ); + } +/* now we have ~15 usec to read/write various registers */ } + +static irqreturn_t rtc_irq (int irq,void *class_dev,struct pt_regs +*regs) { +unsigned long events =0 ; +u8 irq_data; + + irq_data =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG ); + +/* alarm irq? */ +if (irq_data &OMAP_RTC_STATUS_ALARM ) { +rtc_write (OMAP_RTC_STATUS_ALARM ,OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG ); + events |=RTC_IRQF |RTC_AF ; + } + +/* 1/sec periodic/update irq? */ +if (irq_data &OMAP_RTC_STATUS_1S_EVENT ) + events |=RTC_IRQF |RTC_UF ; + +rtc_update_irq (class_dev,1 , events); + +return IRQ_HANDLED ; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV + +static int +omap_rtc_ioctl(struct device *dev, unsigned int cmd,unsigned long arg)
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +74
-0+{ +u8 reg; + +switch (cmd) { +case RTC_AIE_OFF : +case RTC_AIE_ON : +case RTC_UIE_OFF : +case RTC_UIE_ON : +break ; +default : +return -ENOIOCTLCMD ; + } + +local_irq_disable (); +rtc_wait_not_busy (); + reg =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); +switch (cmd) { +/* AIE = Alarm Interrupt Enable */ +case RTC_AIE_OFF : + reg &= ~OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM ; +break ; +case RTC_AIE_ON : + reg |=OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM ; +break ; +/* UIE = Update Interrupt Enable (1/second) */ +case RTC_UIE_OFF : + reg &= ~OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_TIMER ; +break ; +case RTC_UIE_ON : + reg |=OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_TIMER ; +break ; + } +rtc_wait_not_busy (); +rtc_write (reg,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); +local_irq_enable (); + +return 0 ; +} + +#else +#define omap_rtc_ioctl NULL +#endif + +/* this hardware doesn't support "don't care" alarm fields */ static +int tm2bcd (struct rtc_time *tm) { +if (rtc_valid_tm (tm) !=0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + + tm->tm_sec =BIN2BCD (tm->tm_sec); + tm->tm_min =BIN2BCD (tm->tm_min); + tm->tm_hour =BIN2BCD (tm->tm_hour); + tm->tm_mday =BIN2BCD (tm->tm_mday); + + tm->tm_mon =BIN2BCD (tm->tm_mon +1 ); + +/* epoch == 1900 */ +if (tm->tm_year <100 || tm->tm_year >199 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tm->tm_year =BIN2BCD (tm->tm_year -100 ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static void bcd2tm (struct rtc_time *tm) { + tm->tm_sec =BCD2BIN (tm->tm_sec); + tm->tm_min =BCD2BIN (tm->tm_min); + tm->tm_hour =BCD2BIN (tm->tm_hour); + tm->tm_mday =BCD2BIN (tm->tm_mday); + tm->tm_mon =BCD2BIN (tm->tm_mon) -1 ; +/* epoch == 1900 */ + tm->tm_year =BCD2BIN (tm->tm_year) +100 ; } + + +static int omap_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct
rtc_time*tm)drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +38
-0+{ +/* we don't report wday/yday/isdst ... */ +local_irq_disable (); +rtc_wait_not_busy (); + + tm->tm_sec =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_SECONDS_REG ); + tm->tm_min =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_MINUTES_REG ); + tm->tm_hour =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_HOURS_REG ); + tm->tm_mday =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_DAYS_REG ); + tm->tm_mon =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_MONTHS_REG ); + tm->tm_year =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_YEARS_REG ); + +local_irq_enable (); + +bcd2tm (tm); +return 0 ; +} + +static int omap_rtc_set_time (struct device *dev,struct rtc_time *tm) +{ +if (tm2bcd (tm) <0 ) +return -EINVAL ; +local_irq_disable (); +rtc_wait_not_busy (); + +rtc_write (tm->tm_year,OMAP_RTC_YEARS_REG ); +rtc_write (tm->tm_mon,OMAP_RTC_MONTHS_REG ); +rtc_write (tm->tm_mday,OMAP_RTC_DAYS_REG ); +rtc_write (tm->tm_hour,OMAP_RTC_HOURS_REG ); +rtc_write (tm->tm_min,OMAP_RTC_MINUTES_REG ); +rtc_write (tm->tm_sec,OMAP_RTC_SECONDS_REG ); + +local_irq_enable (); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int omap_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct
rtc_wkalrm*alm)drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +22
-0+{ +local_irq_disable (); +rtc_wait_not_busy (); + + alm->time.tm_sec =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_ALARM_SECONDS_REG ); + alm->time.tm_min =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_ALARM_MINUTES_REG ); + alm->time.tm_hour =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_ALARM_HOURS_REG ); + alm->time.tm_mday =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_ALARM_DAYS_REG ); + alm->time.tm_mon =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_ALARM_MONTHS_REG ); + alm->time.tm_year =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_ALARM_YEARS_REG ); + +local_irq_enable (); + +bcd2tm (&alm->time); + alm->pending = !!(rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ) + &OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM ); + alm->enabled = alm->pending &&device_may_wakeup (dev); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int omap_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct
rtc_wkalrm*alm)drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +6
-0+{ +u8 reg; + +/* Much userspace code uses RTC_ALM_SET, thus "don't care" for +* day/month/year specifies alarms up to 24 hours in the future. +* So we need to handle that ... but let's ignore the "don't care"
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +84
-0+* values for hours/minutes/seconds. +*/ +if (alm->time.tm_mday <=0 + && alm->time.tm_mon <0 + && alm->time.tm_year <0 ) { +struct rtc_time tm; +unsigned long now, then; + +omap_rtc_read_time (dev, &tm); +rtc_tm_to_time (&tm, &now); + + alm->time.tm_mday = tm.tm_mday; + alm->time.tm_mon = tm.tm_mon; + alm->time.tm_year = tm.tm_year; +rtc_tm_to_time (&alm->time, &then); + +/* sometimes the alarm wraps into tomorrow */ +if (then < now) { +rtc_time_to_tm (now +24 *60 *60 , &tm); + alm->time.tm_mday = tm.tm_mday; + alm->time.tm_mon = tm.tm_mon; + alm->time.tm_year = tm.tm_year; + } + } + +if (tm2bcd (&alm->time) <0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + +local_irq_disable (); +rtc_wait_not_busy (); + +rtc_write (alm->time.tm_year,OMAP_RTC_ALARM_YEARS_REG ); +rtc_write (alm->time.tm_mon,OMAP_RTC_ALARM_MONTHS_REG ); +rtc_write (alm->time.tm_mday,OMAP_RTC_ALARM_DAYS_REG ); +rtc_write (alm->time.tm_hour,OMAP_RTC_ALARM_HOURS_REG ); +rtc_write (alm->time.tm_min,OMAP_RTC_ALARM_MINUTES_REG ); +rtc_write (alm->time.tm_sec,OMAP_RTC_ALARM_SECONDS_REG ); + + reg =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); +if (alm->enabled) + reg |=OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM ; +else + reg &= ~OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM ; +rtc_write (reg,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); + +local_irq_enable (); + +return 0 ; +} + +static struct rtc_class_ops omap_rtc_ops = { + .ioctl = omap_rtc_ioctl, + .read_time = omap_rtc_read_time, + .set_time = omap_rtc_set_time, + .read_alarm = omap_rtc_read_alarm, + .set_alarm = omap_rtc_set_alarm, +}; + +static int omap_rtc_alarm; +static int omap_rtc_timer; + +static int __devinit omap_rtc_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct resource *res, *mem; +struct rtc_device *rtc; +u8 reg, new_ctrl; + + omap_rtc_timer =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (omap_rtc_timer <=0 ) { +pr_debug ("%s: no update irq?\n" , pdev->name); +return -ENOENT ; + } + + omap_rtc_alarm =platform_get_irq (pdev,1 ); +if (omap_rtc_alarm <=0 ) { +pr_debug ("%s: no alarm irq?\n" , pdev->name); +return -ENOENT ; + } + +/* NOTE: using static mapping for RTC registers */ + res =platform_get_resource (pdev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,0 ); +if (res && res->start !=OMAP_RTC_BASE ) { + pr_debug("%s: RTC registers at %08x, expected %08x\n", + pdev->name, (unsigned) res->start,
OMAP_RTC_BASE);drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +36
-0+return -ENOENT ; + } + +if (res) + mem =request_mem_region (res->start, + res->end - res->start +1 , + pdev->name); +else + mem =NULL ; +if (!mem) { +pr_debug ("%s: RTC registers at %08x are not free\n" , + pdev->name,OMAP_RTC_BASE ); +return -EBUSY ; + } + + rtc =rtc_device_register (pdev->name, &pdev->dev, + &omap_rtc_ops,THIS_MODULE ); +if (IS_ERR (rtc)) { +pr_debug ("%s: can't register RTC device, err %ld\n" , + pdev->name,PTR_ERR (rtc)); + goto fail; + } +platform_set_drvdata (pdev, rtc); +class_set_devdata (&rtc->class_dev, mem); + +/* clear pending irqs, and set 1/second periodic, +* which we'll use instead of update irqs +*/ +rtc_write (0 ,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); + +/* clear old status */ + reg =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG ); +if (reg & (u8 )OMAP_RTC_STATUS_POWER_UP ) { +pr_info ("%s: RTC power up reset detected\n" , + pdev->name); + rtc_write(OMAP_RTC_STATUS_POWER_UP,
OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG);drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +8
-0+ } +if (reg & (u8 )OMAP_RTC_STATUS_ALARM ) +rtc_write (OMAP_RTC_STATUS_ALARM ,OMAP_RTC_STATUS_REG ); + +/* handle periodic and alarm irqs */ +if (request_irq (omap_rtc_timer, rtc_irq,SA_INTERRUPT , + rtc->class_dev.class_id, &rtc->class_dev)) { + pr_debug("%s: RTC timer interrupt IRQ%d alreadyclaimed\n",
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +6
-0+ pdev->name, omap_rtc_timer); + goto fail0; + } +if (request_irq (omap_rtc_alarm, rtc_irq,SA_INTERRUPT , + rtc->class_dev.class_id, &rtc->class_dev)) { + pr_debug("%s: RTC alarm interrupt IRQ%d alreadyclaimed\n",
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +5
-0+ pdev->name, omap_rtc_alarm); + goto fail1; + } + +/* On boards with split power, RTC_ON_NOFF won't reset the RTC */
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +11
-0+ reg =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_CTRL_REG ); +if (reg & (u8 )OMAP_RTC_CTRL_STOP ) +pr_info ("%s: already running\n" , pdev->name); + +/* force to 24 hour mode */ + new_ctrl = reg & ~(OMAP_RTC_CTRL_SPLIT |OMAP_RTC_CTRL_AUTO_COMP ); + new_ctrl |=OMAP_RTC_CTRL_STOP ; + +/* BOARD-SPECIFIC CUSTOMIZATION CAN GO HERE: +* +* - Boards wired so that RTC_WAKE_INT does something, and muxed
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +1
-0+* right (W13_1610_RTC_WAKE_INT is the default after chip reset),
drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +49
-0+* should initialize the device wakeup flag appropriately. +* +* - Boards wired so RTC_ON_nOFF is used as the reset signal, +* rather than nPWRON_RESET, should forcibly enable split +* power mode. (Some chip errata report that RTC_CTRL_SPLIT +* is write-only, and always reads as zero...) +*/ +device_init_wakeup (&pdev->dev,0 ); + +if (new_ctrl & (u8 )OMAP_RTC_CTRL_SPLIT ) +pr_info ("%s: split power mode\n" , pdev->name); + +if (reg != new_ctrl) +rtc_write (new_ctrl,OMAP_RTC_CTRL_REG ); + +return 0 ; + +fail1: +free_irq (omap_rtc_timer,NULL ); +fail0: +rtc_device_unregister (rtc); +fail: +release_resource (mem); +return -EIO ; +} + +static int __devexit omap_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct rtc_device *rtc =platform_get_drvdata (pdev);; + +device_init_wakeup (&pdev->dev,0 ); + +/* leave rtc running, but disable irqs */ +rtc_write (0 ,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); + +free_irq (omap_rtc_timer, rtc); +free_irq (omap_rtc_alarm, rtc); + +release_resource (class_get_devdata (&rtc->class_dev)); +rtc_device_unregister (rtc); +return 0 ; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + +static struct timespec rtc_delta; +static u8 irqstat; + +static int omap_rtc_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
pm_message_tstate)drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c new file +78
-0+{ +struct rtc_time rtc_tm; +struct timespec time; + + time.tv_nsec =0 ; +omap_rtc_read_time (NULL , &rtc_tm); +rtc_tm_to_time (&rtc_tm, &time.tv_sec); + +save_time_delta (&rtc_delta, &time); + irqstat =rtc_read (OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); + +/* FIXME the RTC alarm is not currently acting as a wakeup event +* source, and in fact this enable() call is just saving a flag +* that's never used... +*/ +if (device_may_wakeup (&pdev->dev)) +enable_irq_wake (omap_rtc_alarm); +else +rtc_write (0 ,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int omap_rtc_resume (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct rtc_time rtc_tm; +struct timespec time; + + time.tv_nsec =0 ; +omap_rtc_read_time (NULL , &rtc_tm); +rtc_tm_to_time (&rtc_tm, &time.tv_sec); + +restore_time_delta (&rtc_delta, &time); +if (device_may_wakeup (&pdev->dev)) +disable_irq_wake (omap_rtc_alarm); +else +rtc_write (irqstat,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); +return 0 ; +} + +#else +#define omap_rtc_suspend NULL +#define omap_rtc_resume NULL +#endif + +static void omap_rtc_shutdown (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +rtc_write (0 ,OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG ); +} + +MODULE_ALIAS ("omap_rtc" ); +static struct platform_driver omap_rtc_driver = { + .probe = omap_rtc_probe, + .remove =__devexit_p (omap_rtc_remove), + .suspend = omap_rtc_suspend, + .resume = omap_rtc_resume, + .shutdown = omap_rtc_shutdown, + .driver = { + .name ="omap_rtc" , + .owner =THIS_MODULE , + }, +}; + +static int __init rtc_init (void ) +{ +return platform_driver_register (&omap_rtc_driver); +} + +static void __exit rtc_exit(void) +{ +platform_driver_unregister (&omap_rtc_driver); +} + +module_init (rtc_init); +module_exit (rtc_exit); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("George G. Davis (and others)" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" );_______________________________________________
Linux-omap-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source
Quoted 7 lines · Steve-OMAP
Hi Dave,
For OMAP2 and OMAP3, the RTC is in the Power Management companion chip (TWL92230 and TWL4030).
Where do you see an RTC on the web site for OMAP2420? The only picture I see shows the RTC in the companion chip.
From www.omap.com, click the left hand option then the JavaScript omap2420 link to reach what I suspect is the same page you list (despite linewrap manglage) and includes this graphic:
http://focus.ti.com/graphics/wtbu/blockdiagrams/l4_omap2420.gif
which is a GIF that shows an RTC on the omap2420 chip, in the block labeled "Timers, Interrupt Controllers, RTC". The product overview link on that page gives a PDF document which agrees. (Agreed that the 2420 gif shows another RTC, on the PM chip ... but not for 2430/3430.)
- Dave
Quoted 74 lines
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=
6123&navigationId=11990&contentId=4671Regards,
Steve
Quoted 65 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Brownell
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [patch 2.6.17-rc4-omap-git] rtc-omap, rtc framework driverCleaning out my patch queue ... here's an "rtc class" driver.
Much more suitable for upstream merging than the previous
version, even though that code has gotten much cleaner over time.Could someone confirm that this RTC can't actually do system wakeups without external hardware support? My documentation isn't at all clear on that issue. There's certainly an external wakeup signal available, but text also says that the alarm irq should work the normal way ... but I don't see that happening. It could easily be just a bug in
enable_irq_wakeup(INT_RTC_ALARM)handling, which ISTR looked like a big NOP last I checked (for almost all IRQs).Also, someone with an OMAP2 setup should confirm that the
Kconfigis right, and this particular controller isn't provided on OMAP2. That certainly matches the lack of RTC in the .../mach-omap2 directory, but the TI website says 2420 (but not {2,3}430) has an RTC. Maybe the OMAP 2420 support is just missing, and it's really the same RTC...- Dave
This creates a new RTC-framework driver for the RTC/calendar module found in various OMAP chips, giving a more correct/standard replacement for the older
drivers/char/omap-rtc.cdriver. Differences include:- much smaller/simpler, because it reuses shared infrastructure
- the RTC name will normally be "rtc0" not "rtc"
- the /dev node has a different major and minor numbers
-RTC_ALM_SEThandled as on PCs (alarm within 24 hours)
-RTC_WKALM_SEThandled as on PCs (alarm within this century)
- epoch not changeable (why bother)
- rtc alarm may optionally be a system wakeup event (board-specific)If you use udev and statically link this, some init script can just create a symbolic link (rtc -> rtc0) so tools like "hwclock" will work as usual.
Or, updates to hwclock (and busybox) are available which teach it to use the/dev/rtc0path as a backup, and to support "hwclock --file=/dev/rtc0".Signed-off-by David Brownell <[email protected]>----
Presumably an upstream merge should remove thedevices.csupport for the older non-framework driver.arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c | 2 drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 8 drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 573 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)... deletia ...
David,
Thanks. I'll let marketing know and ask them to fix the graphic.
Regards,
Steve
Quoted 127 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: David Brownell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 5:01 PM
To: Johnson, Steve-OMAP
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.17-rc4-omap-git] rtc-omap, rtc framework driverQuoted 3 lines · Steve-OMAP
Hi Dave,
For OMAP2 and OMAP3, the RTC is in the Power Management
companion chip
Quoted 4 lines
(TWL92230 and TWL4030).
Where do you see an RTC on the web site for OMAP2420? The only picture I see shows the RTC in the companion chip.
From www.omap.com, click the left hand option then the JavaScript omap2420 link to reach what I suspect is the same page you list (despite linewrap
manglage) and includes this graphic:http://focus.ti.com/graphics/wtbu/blockdiagrams/l4_omap2420.gif
which is a GIF that shows an RTC on the omap2420 chip, in the block labeled "Timers, Interrupt Controllers, RTC". The product overview link on that page gives a PDF document which agrees. (Agreed that the 2420 gif shows another RTC, on the PM chip ... but not for 2430/3430.)
- Dave
Quoted 2 lines
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateI
Quoted 11 lines
d=
6123&navigationId=11990&contentId=4671Regards,
Steve
Quoted 3 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] OnBehalf Of
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
David Brownell
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [patch 2.6.17-rc4-omap-git] rtc-omap, rtcframework driver
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Cleaning out my patch queue ... here's an "rtc class" driver.
Much more suitable for upstream merging than theprevious version,
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
even though that code has gotten much cleaner over time.
Could someone confirm that this RTC can't actually do
system wakeups
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
without external hardware support? My documentation isn't at all clear on that issue. There's certainly an external wakeup signal available, but text also says that the alarm irq should work the normal way ... but I don't see that happening. It could
easily be
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
just a bug in
enable_irq_wakeup(INT_RTC_ALARM)handling, which ISTRlooked like a
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
big NOP last I checked (for almost all IRQs).
Also, someone with an OMAP2 setup should confirm that the
KconfigisQuoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
right, and this particular controller isn't provided on
OMAP2. That
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
certainly matches the lack of RTC in the .../mach-omap2
directory,
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
but the TI website says 2420 (but not {2,3}430) has an
RTC. Maybe
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
the OMAP 2420 support is just missing, and it's really the same RTC...
- Dave
This creates a new RTC-framework driver for the
RTC/calendar module
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
found in various OMAP chips, giving a more correct/standard replacement for the older
drivers/char/omap-rtc.cdriver. Differences include:- much smaller/simpler, because it reuses shared infrastructure
- the RTC name will normally be "rtc0" not "rtc"
- the /dev node has a different major and minor numbers
-RTC_ALM_SEThandled as on PCs (alarm within 24 hours)
-RTC_WKALM_SEThandled as on PCs (alarm within this century)
- epoch not changeable (why bother)
- rtc alarm may optionally be a system wakeup event
(board-specific)Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
If you use udev and statically link this, some init
script can just
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
create a symbolic link (rtc -> rtc0) so tools like "hwclock" will work as usual.
Or, updates to hwclock (and busybox) are available whichteach it to
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
use the
/dev/rtc0path as a backup, and to support "hwclock --file=/dev/rtc0".Signed-off-by David Brownell <[email protected]>----
Presumably an upstream merge should remove thedevices.csupport for
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
the older non-framework driver.
arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c | 2 drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 8 drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 573 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)... deletia ...
Quoted 3 lines · Steve-OMAP
David,
Thanks. I'll let marketing know and ask them to fix the graphic.
Good, so issue #2 is resolved ... this _is_ OMAP1-only, the Kconfig is right.
How about #1? Likely it's too late to resolve that doc ambiguity, but it'd be good to know the answer anyway. :)
- Dave
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Could someone confirm that this RTC can't actually do system wakeups
without external hardware support? My documentation isn't at all clear on that issue. There's certainly an external wakeup signal available, but text also says that the alarm irq should work the normal way ... but I don't see that happening. It could easily be just a bug inenable_irq_wakeup(INT_RTC_ALARM)handling, which ISTR looked like a
big NOP last I checked (for almost all IRQs).
Interrupts on Omap5912
Hi All,
Is there anyone who knows about interrupts on OMAP? How are interrupts implemented in omap5912? interrupt priorities? How do you check what interrupt occured? Do you have to check the status register or can you just use omap_get_datain to check if the value have changed? Do you have to clear the pin after the interrupt occured? Hope to hear from anyone you guys.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Interrupts on Omap5912
Hi OJ,
Quoted 2 lines
Is there anyone who knows about interrupts on OMAP? How are interrupts implemented in omap5912?
I have made an example on howto request interrupt using a gpio. (take note that this example is for gpio)
Interrupt input by gpio pin#3
#include <asm/arch/gpio.h>
omap_request_gpio(3); /* Request for gpio pin */omap_set_gpio_direction(3,0);
*Setting up pin for interrupt */ set_irq_type(OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(3),IRQT_RISING);
request_irq(OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(3), (void *)&my_int_handler, SA_SHIRQ,....);
* Do stuff, handle interrupts inmy_int_handler */
free_irq(OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(3),&id); /* Freeing interrupt and gpio pin */omap_free_gpio(3);
Quoted 1 line
Do you have to check the status register
Dirk Behme answered me this before:
There are level and edge triggered GPIO interrupts, depends
on your HW configuration. If you have edge, you normally
don't need to acknowledge anything. If you have level, you
have to check if you have to acknowledge the interrupt in
the external unit issuing the irq on GPIO pin to make the
level go away before exiting the ISR.
But this is with regards to gpio. You can see Documentation/arm/interrupts for more info. Just need some readings.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Tony Lindgren
reviewerQuoted 9 lines · David Brownell
Quoted 3 lines · Steve-OMAP
David,
Thanks. I'll let marketing know and ask them to fix the graphic.
Good, so issue #2 is resolved ... this _is_ OMAP1-only, the
Kconfigis right.How about #1? Likely it's too late to resolve that doc ambiguity, but it'd be good to know the answer anyway. :)
Sounds like it should be capable of waking up the system if 32KHz clock is on and the wake-up events are configured properly.
Anyways, pushing today. Let's also plan on removing the old driver then.
Regards,
Tony
Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren
Sounds like it should be capable of waking up the system if 32KHz clock is on and the wake-up events are configured properly.
Yes. I had more of a look at things, and have a patch (yet to be tested) that should let many more things be wakeup event sources. MPUIO irqs, GPIOs not in the first bank, non-MPUI/GPIO irqs (like RTC), etc.
Quoted 1 line
Anyways, pushing today. Let's also plan on removing the old driver then.
Let's get the wakeup thing fixed, then I'll forward rtc-omap upstream if nobody reports any significant problems.
Might as well leave the old version in the OMAP tree until the new one gets pulled down.
- Dave
Tony Lindgren
reviewerQuoted 8 lines · David Brownell
Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren
Sounds like it should be capable of waking up the system if 32KHz clock is on and the wake-up events are configured properly.
Yes. I had more of a look at things, and have a patch (yet to be tested) that should let many more things be wakeup event sources. MPUIO irqs, GPIOs not in the first bank, non-MPUI/GPIO irqs (like RTC), etc.
Cool.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Anyways, pushing today. Let's also plan on removing the old driver then.
Let's get the wakeup thing fixed, then I'll forward rtc-omap upstream if nobody reports any significant problems.
OK
Quoted 2 lines
Might as well leave the old version in the OMAP tree until the new one gets pulled down.
OK
Tony
Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 8 lines · David Brownell
Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren
Sounds like it should be capable of waking up the system if 32KHz clock is on and the wake-up events are configured properly.
Yes. I had more of a look at things, and have a patch (yet to be tested) that should let many more things be wakeup event sources. MPUIO irqs, GPIOs not in the first bank, non-MPUI/GPIO irqs (like RTC), etc.
Cool.
hmm, not sure when I'll have a chance to test it, so here it is...
Handle wakeup irqs more correctly and completely ... the set of wakeup events is dynmically specified, not statically, and any IRQ is eligible.
- (PLATFORM) Add/use MPUIO/ARMIO wakeup event handling, as for GPIO.
- (PLATFORM) Enabling a GPIO or MPUIO irq as a wakeup event source automatically enables its parent MPU L1 or L2 IRQ; this is easy now that wakeup enables/disables are properly refcounted.
- (OMAP1) Move pm wakeup event setup from pm.c into irq.c so that it can obey driver {en,dis}able_irq_wake() calls ... so now any L1 or L2 IRQ source can be a wakeup event, not just a small static group.
- (OMAP1) Only L1->L2 cascades are always marked as wakeup sources.
This means that drivers can now use /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup userspace configuration for board-specific policies about activating wakeup sources.
UNTESTED.
TODO: Various drivers, notably the keypad driver, need to learn about being device_can_wakeup() and {en,dis}able_irq_wake().
arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c +64 -15
@@ -646,13 +646,17 @@ static inline void _set_gpio_irqenable(sstatic int _set_gpio_wakeup (struct gpio_bank *bank,int gpio,int enable) {switch (bank->method) { +case METHOD_MPUIO :case METHOD_GPIO_1610 :case METHOD_GPIO_24XX :spin_lock (&bank->lock); -if (enable) +if (enable) { bank->suspend_wakeup |= (1 << gpio); -else +enable_irq_wake (bank->irq); + }else { bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~(1 << gpio); +disable_irq_wake (bank->irq); + }spin_unlock (&bank->lock);return 0 ;default :
@@ -945,6 +949,21 @@ static void gpio_unmask_irq(unsigned int_set_gpio_irqenable (bank, gpio_idx,1 ); } +static struct irq_chip gpio_irq_chip = { + .name ="GPIO" , + .startup = gpio_irq_startup, + .shutdown = gpio_irq_shutdown, + .ack = gpio_ack_irq, + .mask = gpio_mask_irq, + .unmask = gpio_unmask_irq, + .set_type = gpio_irq_type, + .set_wake = gpio_wake_enable, +}; + +/*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/ + +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX +static void mpuio_ack_irq (unsigned int irq) {/* The ISR is reset automatically, so do nothing here. */
@@ -966,24 +985,46 @@ static void mpuio_unmask_irq(unsigned in_set_gpio_irqenable (bank, gpio,1 ); } -static struct irq_chip gpio_irq_chip = { - .name ="GPIO" , - .startup = gpio_irq_startup, - .shutdown = gpio_irq_shutdown, - .ack = gpio_ack_irq, - .mask = gpio_mask_irq, - .unmask = gpio_unmask_irq, - .set_type = gpio_irq_type, +static struct irq_chip mpuio_irq_chip = { + .name ="MPUIO" , + .ack = mpuio_ack_irq, + .mask = mpuio_mask_irq, + .unmask = mpuio_unmask_irq, .set_wake = gpio_wake_enable, }; -static struct irq_chip mpuio_irq_chip = { - .name ="MPUIO" , - .ack = mpuio_ack_irq, - .mask = mpuio_mask_irq, - .unmask = mpuio_unmask_irq +static int omap_mpuio_suspend (struct sys_device *dev,pm_message_t mesg) +{ +void __iomem *reg = gpio_bank[0 ].base +OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_MASKIT ; + + gpio_bank[0 ].saved_wakeup =__raw_readw (reg); +__raw_writew (~gpio_bank[0 ].suspend_wakeup, reg); +return 0 ; +} + +static int omap_mpuio_resume (struct sys_device *dev) +{ +void __iomem *reg = gpio_bank[0 ].base +OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_MASKIT ; + +__raw_writew (gpio_bank[0 ].saved_wakeup, reg); +return 0 ; +} + +static struct sysdev_class omap_mpuio_sysclass = { +set_kset_name ("mpuio" ), + .suspend = omap_mpuio_suspend, + .resume = omap_mpuio_resume, +}; + +static struct sys_device omap_mpuio_device = { + .id =0 , + .cls = &omap_mpuio_sysclass, }; +#endif + +/*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/ +static int initialized;static struct clk * gpio_ick;static struct clk * gpio_fck;
@@ -1215,6 +1256,14 @@ static int __init omap_gpio_sysinit(voidif (!initialized) ret =_omap_gpio_init (); +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX +if (ret ==0 ) { + ret =sysdev_class_register (&omap_mpuio_sysclass); +if (ret ==0 ) + ret =sysdev_register (&omap_mpuio_device); + } +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX ) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX )if (cpu_is_omap16xx () ||cpu_is_omap24xx ()) {if (ret ==0 ) {
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c +41 -0
65 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c +1 -50
58 lines not on this page · raw message