mem driver: fix conditional on isa i/o support
PATCH 1/1 mem driver: fix conditional on isa i/o support
This change corrects the logic on the preprocessor conditionals that include support for ISA port i/o (/dev/ioports) into the mem character driver.
This fixes the following error when building for powerpc platforms with CONFIG_PCI=n.
drivers/built-in.o: undefined reference to `pci_io_base'
---
I've only tested this on powerpc (cell) build. Testing on other arch's would be welcome.
-Geoff
drivers/char/mem.c +4 -4
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@return virtr + wrote; } -#if defined(CONFIG_ISA ) || !defined(__mc68000__) +#if (defined(CONFIG_ISA ) || defined(CONFIG_PCI )) && !defined(__mc68000__)static ssize_t read_port (struct file * file,char __user * buf,size_t count,loff_t *ppos) {
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ .splice_write = splice_write_null, }; -#if defined(CONFIG_ISA ) || !defined(__mc68000__) +#if (defined(CONFIG_ISA ) || defined(CONFIG_PCI )) && !defined(__mc68000__)static const struct file_operations port_fops = { .llseek = memory_lseek, .read = read_port,
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@case 3 : filp->f_op = &null_fops;break ; -#if defined(CONFIG_ISA ) || !defined(__mc68000__) +#if (defined(CONFIG_ISA ) || defined(CONFIG_PCI )) && !defined(__mc68000__)case 4 : filp->f_op = &port_fops;break ;
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ {1, "mem", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP, &mem_fops}, {2, "kmem", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP, &kmem_fops}, {3, "null", S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO, &null_fops}, -#if defined(CONFIG_ISA) || !defined(__mc68000__) +#if (defined(CONFIG_ISA) || defined(CONFIG_PCI)) && !defined(__mc68000__) {4, "port", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP, &port_fops}, #endif {5, "zero", S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO, &zero_fops},
Quoted 10 lines · Geoff Levand
This change corrects the logic on the preprocessor conditionals that include support for ISA port i/o (
/dev/ioports) into the mem character driver.This fixes the following error when building for powerpc platforms with
CONFIG_PCI=n.
drivers/built-in.o: undefined reference to `pci_io_base'Signed-off-by Geoff Levand <[email protected]>
Discussd very breifly on ppc64 mailing list, seems to be the right thing to do.
--linas