Skip to contentSkip to conversation

gitweb: Do not parse refs by hand, use git-peek-remote instead

PATCH In review Jakub Narebski 2 participants 9 messages Jun 15, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 gitweb: Do not parse refs by hand, use git-peek-remote instead

This is response to Linus work on packed refs. Additionally it makes gitweb work with symrefs, too.

Do not parse refs by hand, using File::Find and reading individual heads to get hash of reference, but use git-peek-remote output instead. Assume that the hash for deref (with ^{}) always follows hash for ref, and that we hav derefs only for tags objects; this removes call to git_get_type (and git-cat-file -t invocation) for tags, which speeds "summary" and "tags" views generation, but might slow generation of "heads" view a bit. As of now we do not save and use the deref hash.

Remove git_get_hash_by_ref while at it, as git_get_refs_list was the only place it was used.

---
By the way, the previous patch
"gitweb: Use File::Find::find in git_get_projects_list"
was added during working on this feature.

 gitweb/gitweb.perl |   39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
gitweb/gitweb.perl +17 -22
index 25383bc..4e58a6b 100755
@@ -676,19 +676,6 @@ sub git_get_hash_by_path {
 ## ......................................................................
 ## git utility functions, directly accessing git repository
 
-# assumes that PATH is not symref
-sub git_get_hash_by_ref {
-	my $path = shift;
-
-	open my $fd, "$projectroot/$path" or return undef;
-	my $head = <$fd>;
-	close $fd;
-	chomp $head;
-	if ($head =~ m/^[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$/) {
-		return $head;
-	}
-}
-
 sub git_get_project_description {
 	my $path = shift;
 
@@ -1098,17 +1085,25 @@ sub git_get_refs_list {
 	my @reflist;
 
 	my @refs;
-	my $pfxlen = length("$projectroot/$project/$ref_dir");
-	File::Find::find(sub {
-		return if (/^\./);
-		if (-f $_) {
-			push @refs, substr($File::Find::name, $pfxlen + 1);
+	open my $fd, "-|", $GIT, "peek-remote", "$projectroot/$project/"
+		or return;
+	while (my $line = <$fd>) {
+		chomp $line;
+		if ($line =~ m/^([0-9a-fA-F]{40})\t$ref_dir\/?([^\^]+)$/) {
+			push @refs, { hash => $1, name => $2 };
+		} elsif ($line =~ m/^[0-9a-fA-F]{40}\t$ref_dir\/?.*\^\{\}$/) {
+			# assume that "peeled" ref is always after ref,
+			# and that you "peel" (deref) tags only
+			$refs[$#refs]->{'type'} = "tag";
 		}
-	}, "$projectroot/$project/$ref_dir");
+	}
+	close $fd;
+
+	foreach my $ref (@refs) {
+		my $ref_file = $ref->{'name'};
+		my $ref_id   = $ref->{'hash'};
 
-	foreach my $ref_file (@refs) {
-		my $ref_id = git_get_hash_by_ref("$project/$ref_dir/$ref_file");
-		my $type = git_get_type($ref_id) || next;
+		my $type = $ref->{'type'} || git_get_type($ref_id) || next;
 		my %ref_item = parse_ref($ref_file, $ref_id, $type);
 
 		push @reflist, \%ref_item;
Signature · 1 line
1.4.2
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Jakub Narebski

Remove git_get_hash_by_ref while at it, as git_get_refs_list was the only place it was used.

That's a very good news.

Quoted 11 lines
gitweb/gitweb.perl +10 -0
+	open my $fd, "-|", $GIT, "peek-remote", "$projectroot/$project/"
+		or return;
+	while (my $line = <$fd>) {
+		chomp $line;
+		if ($line =~ m/^([0-9a-fA-F]{40})\t$ref_dir\/?([^\^]+)$/) {
+			push @refs, { hash => $1, name => $2 };
+		} elsif ($line =~ m/^[0-9a-fA-F]{40}\t$ref_dir\/?.*\^\{\}$/) {
+			# assume that "peeled" ref is always after ref,
+			# and that you "peel" (deref) tags only
+			$refs[$#refs]->{'type'} = "tag";
		}

The assumption is good; we never show a ref^{} before showing ref itself. But you probably would want to safeguard yourself from future changes by not depending on "immediately after". At least you can check $refs[-1]{'name'} is the same as the unpeeled ref you are looking at, like this:

	if ($line =~ m/^([0-9a-fA-F]{40})\t$ref_dir\/?([^\^]+)$/) {
		push @refs, { hash => $1, name => $2 };
	} elsif ($line =~ m/^[0-9a-fA-F]{40}\t$ref_dir\/?(.*)\^\{\}$/ &&
                 $1 eq $refs[-1]{'name'}) {
		# most likely a tag is followed by its peeled
		# one, and when that happens we know the
		# previous one was of type 'tag'.
		$refs[$#refs]->{'type'} = "tag";
	} ...

gitweb/gitweb.perl sub git_get_refs_list { · line 1106

Quoted 5 lines
gitweb/gitweb.perl +4 -1
+	foreach my $ref (@refs) {
+		my $ref_file = $ref->{'name'};
+		my $ref_id   = $ref->{'hash'};
-		my $type = git_get_type($ref_id) || next;
+		my $type = $ref->{'type'} || git_get_type($ref_id) || next;

And this is a good incremental change to reduce number of external calls.

#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 gitweb: Do not parse refs by hand, use git-peek-remote instead

This is in response to Linus work on packed refs. Additionally it makes gitweb work with symrefs, too.

Do not parse refs by hand, using File::Find and reading individual heads to get hash of reference, but use git-peek-remote output instead. Assume that the hash for deref (with ^{}) always follows hash for ref, and that we hav derefs only for tags objects; this removes call to git_get_type (and git-cat-file -t invocation) for tags, which speeds "summary" and "tags" views generation, but might slow generation of "heads" view a bit. As of now we do not save and use the deref hash.

Remove git_get_hash_by_ref while at it, as git_get_refs_list was the only place it was used.

---
 gitweb/gitweb.perl |   41 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
gitweb/gitweb.perl +19 -22
index 25383bc..b4a890b 100755
@@ -676,19 +676,6 @@ sub git_get_hash_by_path {
 ## ......................................................................
 ## git utility functions, directly accessing git repository
 
-# assumes that PATH is not symref
-sub git_get_hash_by_ref {
-	my $path = shift;
-
-	open my $fd, "$projectroot/$path" or return undef;
-	my $head = <$fd>;
-	close $fd;
-	chomp $head;
-	if ($head =~ m/^[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$/) {
-		return $head;
-	}
-}
-
 sub git_get_project_description {
 	my $path = shift;
 
@@ -1098,17 +1085,27 @@ sub git_get_refs_list {
 	my @reflist;
 
 	my @refs;
-	my $pfxlen = length("$projectroot/$project/$ref_dir");
-	File::Find::find(sub {
-		return if (/^\./);
-		if (-f $_) {
-			push @refs, substr($File::Find::name, $pfxlen + 1);
+	open my $fd, "-|", $GIT, "peek-remote", "$projectroot/$project/"
+		or return;
+	while (my $line = <$fd>) {
+		chomp $line;
+		if ($line =~ m/^([0-9a-fA-F]{40})\t$ref_dir\/?([^\^]+)$/) {
+			push @refs, { hash => $1, name => $2 };
+		} elsif ($line =~ m/^[0-9a-fA-F]{40}\t$ref_dir\/?(.*)\^\{\}$/ &&
+		         $1 eq $refs[-1]{'name'}) {
+			# most likely a tag is followed by its peeled
+			# (deref) one, and when that happens we know the
+			# previous one was of type 'tag'.
+			$refs[-1]{'type'} = "tag";
 		}
-	}, "$projectroot/$project/$ref_dir");
+	}
+	close $fd;
+
+	foreach my $ref (@refs) {
+		my $ref_file = $ref->{'name'};
+		my $ref_id   = $ref->{'hash'};
 
-	foreach my $ref_file (@refs) {
-		my $ref_id = git_get_hash_by_ref("$project/$ref_dir/$ref_file");
-		my $type = git_get_type($ref_id) || next;
+		my $type = $ref->{'type'} || git_get_type($ref_id) || next;
 		my %ref_item = parse_ref($ref_file, $ref_id, $type);
 
 		push @reflist, \%ref_item;
Signature · 1 line
1.4.2
#3 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Jakub Narebski

This is in response to Linus work on packed refs. Additionally it makes gitweb work with symrefs, too.

Do not parse refs by hand, using File::Find and reading individual heads to get hash of reference, but use git-peek-remote output instead.

Looks nicer. Will apply.

Now, once we start doing this, it may make sense to rethink how this function and git_get_references functions are used. I think

	git grep -n -e '^sub ' \
        	-e git_get_references \
                -e git_get_refs_list gitweb/gitweb.perl

would be instructive how wasteful the current code is.

get_refs_list is called _TWICE_ in git_summary and worse yet very late in the function, after calling git_get_references that could already have done what the function does (by the way, git_get_references already knows how to use peek-remote output but for some reason it uses ls-remote -- I think you can safely rewrite it to use peek-remote). So you end up doing peek-remote three times to draw the summary page.

git_get_references are called from almost everywhere that shows the list of commits, which is understandable because we would want to see those markers in the list.

I very much suspect that you can use git_get_refs_list to return a hash and a sorted list at the same time from the same input and make git_summary to do with just a single call to it, and get rid of git_get_references with a little bit of restructuring of the caller.

Hmm?

#4 lore raw
Quoted 22 lines · Junio C Hamano

Now, once we start doing this, it may make sense to rethink how this function and git_get_references functions are used. I think

	git grep -n -e '^sub ' \
        	-e git_get_references \
                -e git_get_refs_list gitweb/gitweb.perl

would be instructive how wasteful the current code is.

get_refs_list is called _TWICE_ in git_summary and worse yet very late in the function, after calling git_get_references that could already have done what the function does (by the way, git_get_references already knows how to use peek-remote output but for some reason it uses ls-remote -- I think you can safely rewrite it to use peek-remote). So you end up doing peek-remote three times to draw the summary page.

git_get_references are called from almost everywhere that shows the list of commits, which is understandable because we would want to see those markers in the list.

Quoted 5 lines

I very much suspect that you can use git_get_refs_list to return a hash and a sorted list at the same time from the same input and make git_summary to do with just a single call to it, and get rid of git_get_references with a little bit of restructuring of the caller.

We can easily collapse two calls for git_get_refs_list in gi_summary, one for tags and one for heads into one call plus some filtering. Changing git_get_refs_list to do also the job of git_get_references means that in git_tags and git_heads we do extra the job of git_get_references. Neither git_tags, nor git_heads use references and refs marker; using the heads references in git_heads and tags references in git_tags is repeating the same information twice, cluttering the output. Unless we want to add yet another subroutine...

But as call to git-peek-remote is what takes most time, we can waste some time processing references which we would not use for the sake of clarity. Well, we can get rid of git_get_references too, if we don't mind slight decrease in performance.

We would then use:
git_summary:
my ($refs, $reflist) = git_get_refs_list();
my @taglist = map { s!^tags/!! } grep { m!^tags/! } @$reflist; my @headlist = map { s!^heads/!! } grep { m!^heads/! } @$reflist;

git_heads, git_tags:
my (undef, $taglist) = git_get_refs_list("tags"); my (undef, $headlist) = git_get_refs_list("heads");

everywhere else
my ($refs, undef) = git_get_refs_list($type);

Signature · 2 lines
Jakub Narebski
Poland
#5 lore raw
In reply to Junio C Hamano
Quoted 13 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 6 lines · Jakub Narebski

This is in response to Linus work on packed refs. Additionally it makes gitweb work with symrefs, too.

Do not parse refs by hand, using File::Find and reading individual heads to get hash of reference, but use git-peek-remote output instead.

Looks nicer. Will apply.

Now, once we start doing this, it may make sense to rethink how this function and git_get_references functions are used.

[...]

Quoted 5 lines

I very much suspect that you can use git_get_refs_list to return a hash and a sorted list at the same time from the same input and make git_summary to do with just a single call to it, and get rid of git_get_references with a little bit of restructuring of the caller.

It can be done. Well, we could also collapse git_get_references and git_get_refs_list into one subroutine, but it would be slightly slower than git_get_references.

But, if we change git_get_refs_list to do also work of git_get_references, we should also change git_get_references to not use info/refs file at all (it can, and usually for unknown reasons is stale) but always use git-peek-remote, for consistency.

Signature · 3 lines
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
#6 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Narebski

But, if we change git_get_refs_list to do also work of git_get_references, we should also change git_get_references to not use info/refs file at all (it can, and usually for unknown reasons is stale) but always use git-peek-remote, for consistency.

Yes that would make sense. A repository served by gitweb does not necessarily has to serve objects over http transport, so it is nicer not to require info/refs to even exist or up to date.

#7 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Narebski

But, if we change git_get_refs_list to do also work of git_get_references, we should also change git_get_references to not use info/refs file at all (it can, and usually for unknown reasons is stale) but always use git-peek-remote, for consistency.

Yes that would make sense. A repository served by gitweb does not necessarily has to serve objects over http transport, so it is nicer not to require info/refs to even exist or up to date.

We do not require info/refs, as currently git_get_references falls back to git-ls-remotes (should be git-peek-remote as it is faster) if info/refs does not exist. But info/refs is usually stale; I guess it is updated on pull/fetch/push, but not on commit.

Signature · 2 lines
Jakub Narebski
Poland
#8 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Jakub Narebski
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Narebski

But, if we change git_get_refs_list to do also work of git_get_references, we should also change git_get_references to not use info/refs file at all (it can, and usually for unknown reasons is stale) but always use git-peek-remote, for consistency.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Yes that would make sense. A repository served by gitweb does not necessarily has to serve objects over http transport, so it is nicer not to require info/refs to even exist or up to date.

We do not require info/refs, as currently git_get_references falls back to git-ls-remotes (should be git-peek-remote as it is faster) if info/refs does not exist. But info/refs is usually stale; I guess it is updated on pull/fetch/push, but not on commit.

Yes, we are in agreement and are saying the same thing.