[PATCH RESEND 0/4]
Subsystems (2)
cover [PATCH RESEND 0/4]
Hi John,
These patches have been send during 2006 but never have been applied or rejected. Even after sending requests for updates on these patches.
So I have no idea if you had rejected them, simply overlooked them, or if they are still in your pending list.
Short summary of which patches are being resend:
- crc-itu-t
This has been send to the list during the summer around the same time as the initial patch for rfkill. It had also been send to the linux-kernel list with a CC to you with a request for comment.
- eeprom_93cx6
This has been send to the list1 or 2 months ago. After the initial patch a feature request for eeprom write support was made. Those 2 patches have now been merged into a single patch.
Both of the libraries come from rt2x00, and this patch merely moves them to the location for more generic routines.
Both the crc as the eeprom handling can be used by different drivers (some drivers also use the same implementation, which in my opinion would jusitify these 2 modules to be in the lib folder).
Ivo
Hi John,
Quoted 19 lines
These patches have been send during 2006 but never have been applied or rejected. Even after sending requests for updates on these patches.
So I have no idea if you had rejected them, simply overlooked them, or if they are still in your pending list.Short summary of which patches are being resend:
- crc-itu-t
This has been send to the list during the summer around the same time as the initial patch for rfkill. It had also been send to the linux-kernel list with a CC to you with a request for comment.-
eeprom_93cx6
This has been send to the list1 or 2 months ago. After the initial patch a feature request for eeprom write support was made. Those 2 patches have now been merged into a single patch.
Quoted 5 lines
Both of the libraries come from rt2x00, and this patch merely moves them to the location for more generic routines.
Both the crc as the eeprom handling can be used by different drivers (some drivers also use the same implementation, which in my opinion would jusitify these 2 modules to be in the lib folder).
Do you have any status update for these 4 patches? Are they pending, or have they been rejected?
Thanks,
Ivo