proc: remove pathetic ->deleted WARN_ON

WARN_ON(de && de->deleted); is sooo unreliable. Why?

proc_lookup remove_proc_entry
=========== =================
lock_kernel();
spin_lock(&proc_subdir_lock);
[find proc entry]

spin_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
					spin_lock(&proc_subdir_lock);
					[find proc entry]

proc_get_inode
==============
WARN_ON(de && de->deleted); ...

					if (!atomic_read(&de->count))
						free_proc_entry(de);
					else
						de->deleted = 1;

So, if you have some strange oops [1], and doesn't see this WARN_ON it means nothing.

[1] try_module_get() of module which doesn't exist, two lines below should suffice, or not?

---

 fs/proc/inode.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

@@ -418,8 +418,6 @@ struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct supe
 {
 	struct inode * inode;
 
-	WARN_ON(de && de->deleted);
-
 	if (de != NULL && !try_module_get(de->owner))
 		goto out_mod;