parport->dev driver model support
PATCH 1/3 parport->dev driver model support
Currently a parport_driver can't get a handle on the device node for the underlying parport (PNPACPI, PCI, etc). That prevents correct placement of sysfs child nodes, which can affect things like power management.
This patch adds a field to "struct parport" pointing to that device node, and updates non-legacy port drivers to initialize that device pointer. That field replaces the analagous PCI-only support in parport_pc.
---
NOTE this depends on an earlier patch to make pnp devices set up DMA, parport is the primary user of legacy i8237 dma infrastructure.
drivers/parport/parport_cs.c | 2 +- drivers/parport/parport_mfc3.c | 1 + drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/parport/parport_serial.c | 2 +- drivers/parport/parport_sunbpp.c | 1 + drivers/parport/share.c | 5 +++++ include/linux/parport.h | 8 ++++++-- include/linux/parport_pc.h | 3 +-- 8 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
include/linux/parport.h +6 -2
@@ -279,6 +279,10 @@ struct parport {int dma;int muxport;/* which muxport (if any) this is */ int portnum;/* which physical parallel port (not mux) */ +struct device *dev;/* Physical device associated with IO/DMA. +* This may unfortulately be null if the +* port has a legacy driver. +*/ struct parport *physport;/* If this is a non-default mux
@@ -289,7 +293,7 @@ struct parport { following structure members are meaningless: devices, cad, muxsel, waithead, waittail, flags, pdir, - ieee1284, *_lock. + dev, ieee1284, *_lock. It this is a default mux parport, or there is no mux involved, this points to
@@ -302,7 +306,7 @@ struct parport {struct pardevice *waithead;struct pardevice *waittail; - +struct list_head list;unsigned int flags;
include/linux/parport_pc.h +1 -2
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ struct parport_pc_private {/* buffer suitable for DMA, if DMA enabled */ char *dma_buf;dma_addr_t dma_handle; -struct pci_dev *dev;struct list_head list;struct parport *port; };
@@ -232,7 +231,7 @@ extern int parport_pc_claim_resources(stextern struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port (unsigned long base,unsigned long base_hi,int irq,int dma, -struct pci_dev *dev); +struct device *dev);extern void parport_pc_unregister_port (struct parport *p);#endif
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c +17 -14
@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static size_t parport_pc_fifo_write_blocunsigned long dmaflag;size_t left = length;const struct parport_pc_private *priv = port->physport->private_data; +struct device *dev = port->physport->dev;dma_addr_t dma_addr, dma_handle;size_t maxlen =0x10000 ;/* max 64k per DMA transfer */ unsigned long start = (unsigned long ) buf;
@@ -631,8 +632,8 @@ dump_parport_state ("enter fifo_write_blif ((start ^ end) & ~0xffffUL ) maxlen =0x10000 - (start &0xffff ); - dma_addr = dma_handle =pci_map_single (priv->dev, (void *)buf, length, -PCI_DMA_TODEVICE ); + dma_addr = dma_handle =dma_map_single (dev, (void *)buf, length, +DMA_TO_DEVICE ); }else {/* above 16 MB we use a bounce buffer as ISA-DMA is not possible */ maxlen =PAGE_SIZE ;/* sizeof(priv->dma_buf) */
@@ -728,9 +729,9 @@ dump_parport_state ("enter fifo_write_bl/* Turn off DMA mode */ frob_econtrol (port,1 <<3 ,0 ); - +if (dma_handle) -pci_unmap_single (priv->dev, dma_handle, length,PCI_DMA_TODEVICE ); +dma_unmap_single (dev, dma_handle, length,DMA_TO_DEVICE );dump_parport_state ("leave fifo_write_block_dma" , port);return length - left;
@@ -2146,7 +2147,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ports_lock);struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port (unsigned long int base,unsigned long int base_hi,int irq,int dma, -struct pci_dev *dev) +struct device *dev) {struct parport_pc_private *priv;struct parport_operations *ops;
@@ -2180,9 +2181,10 @@ struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port (u priv->fifo_depth =0 ; priv->dma_buf =NULL ; priv->dma_handle =0 ; - priv->dev = dev;INIT_LIST_HEAD (&priv->list); priv->port = p; + + p->dev = dev; p->base_hi = base_hi; p->modes =PARPORT_MODE_PCSPP |PARPORT_MODE_SAFEININT ; p->private_data = priv;
@@ -2305,9 +2307,10 @@ struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port (u p->dma =PARPORT_DMA_NONE ; }else { priv->dma_buf = -pci_alloc_consistent (priv->dev, +dma_alloc_coherent (dev,PAGE_SIZE , - &priv->dma_handle); + &priv->dma_handle, +GFP_KERNEL );if (! priv->dma_buf) {printk (KERN_WARNING "%s: " "cannot get buffer for DMA, "
@@ -2383,7 +2386,7 @@ void parport_pc_unregister_port (structrelease_region (p->base_hi,3 );#if defined(CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO ) && defined(HAS_DMA )if (priv->dma_buf) -pci_free_consistent (priv->dev,PAGE_SIZE , +dma_free_coherent (p->physport->dev,PAGE_SIZE , priv->dma_buf, priv->dma_handle);#endif
@@ -2489,7 +2492,7 @@ static int __devinit sio_ite_8872_probe*/ release_resource (base_res);if (parport_pc_probe_port (ite8872_lpt, ite8872_lpthi, - irq,PARPORT_DMA_NONE ,NULL )) { + irq,PARPORT_DMA_NONE , &pdev->dev)) {printk (KERN_INFO "parport_pc: ITE 8872 parallel port: io=0x%X" , ite8872_lpt);
@@ -2672,7 +2675,7 @@ static int __devinit sio_via_probe (stru }/* finally, do the probe with values obtained */ -if (parport_pc_probe_port (port1, port2, irq, dma,NULL )) { +if (parport_pc_probe_port (port1, port2, irq, dma, &pdev->dev)) {printk (KERN_INFO "parport_pc: VIA parallel port: io=0x%X" , port1);if (irq !=PARPORT_IRQ_NONE )
@@ -2970,7 +2973,7 @@ static int parport_pc_pci_probe (struct parport_pc_pci_tbl[i + last_sio].device, io_lo, io_hi); data->ports[count] =parport_pc_probe_port (io_lo, io_hi,PARPORT_IRQ_NONE , -PARPORT_DMA_NONE , dev); +PARPORT_DMA_NONE , &dev->dev);if (data->ports[count]) count++; }
@@ -3077,8 +3080,8 @@ static int parport_pc_pnp_probe(struct p }else dma =PARPORT_DMA_NONE ; -printk (KERN_INFO "parport: PnPBIOS parport detected.\n" ); -if (!(pdata =parport_pc_probe_port (io_lo, io_hi, irq, dma,NULL ))) +dev_info (&dev->dev,"reported by %s\n" , dev->protocol->name); +if (!(pdata =parport_pc_probe_port (io_lo, io_hi, irq, dma, &dev->dev)))return -ENODEV ;pnp_set_drvdata (dev,pdata);
drivers/parport/share.c +5 -0
@@ -365,6 +365,11 @@ void parport_announce_port (struct parpoparport_daisy_init (port);#endif +if (!port->dev) +printk (KERN_WARNING "%s: fix this legacy " +"no-device port driver!\n" , + port->name); +parport_proc_register (port);mutex_lock (®istration_lock);spin_lock_irq (&parportlist_lock);
drivers/parport/parport_mfc3.c +1 -0
@@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ static int __init parport_mfc3_init(voidif (request_irq (IRQ_AMIGA_PORTS , mfc3_interrupt,IRQF_SHARED , p->name, &pp_mfc3_ops)) goto out_irq; } + p->dev = &z->dev; this_port[pias++] = p;printk (KERN_INFO "%s: Multiface III port using irq\n" , p->name);
drivers/parport/parport_sunbpp.c +1 -0
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static int __devinit init_one_port(struc goto out_free_ops; p->size = size; + p->dev = &sdev->ofdev.dev;if ((err =request_irq (p->irq, parport_sunbpp_interrupt,IRQF_SHARED , p->name, p)) !=0 ) {
drivers/parport/parport_serial.c +1 -1
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int __devinit parport_register (sdev_dbg (&dev->dev,"PCI parallel port detected: I/O at " "%#lx(%#lx)\n" , io_lo, io_hi); port =parport_pc_probe_port (io_lo, io_hi,PARPORT_IRQ_NONE , -PARPORT_DMA_NONE , dev); +PARPORT_DMA_NONE , &dev->dev);if (port) { priv->port[priv->num_par++] = port; success =1 ;
drivers/parport/parport_cs.c +1 -1
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static int parport_config(struct pcmcia_ p =parport_pc_probe_port (link->io.BasePort1, link->io.BasePort2, link->irq.AssignedIRQ,PARPORT_DMA_NONE , -NULL ); + &link->dev);if (p ==NULL ) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "parport_cs: parport_pc_probe_port() at " "0x%3x, irq %u failed\n", link->io.BasePort1,
Quoted 4 lines · On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:06:19 -0700 David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:
Currently a
parport_drivercan't get a handle on the device node for the underlying parport (PNPACPI, PCI, etc). That prevents correct placement of sysfs child nodes, which can affect things like power management.
Quoted 8 lines
This patch adds a field to "struct parport" pointing to that device node, and updates non-legacy port drivers to initialize that device pointer. That field replaces the analagous PCI-only support in
parport_pc.Signed-off-by David Brownell <[email protected]>---
NOTE this depends on an earlier patch to make pnp devices set up DMA, parport is the primary user of legacy i8237 dma infrastructure.
Confusion reigns.
To which "earlier patch" do you refer?
Quoted 11 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 8 lines · On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:06:19 -0700 David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:
Currently a
parport_drivercan't get a handle on the device node for the underlying parport (PNPACPI, PCI, etc). That prevents correct placement of sysfs child nodes, which can affect things like power management.This patch adds a field to "struct parport" pointing to that device node, and updates non-legacy port drivers to initialize that device pointer. That field replaces the analagous PCI-only support in
parport_pc.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Signed-off-by David Brownell <[email protected]>---
NOTE this depends on an earlier patch to make pnp devices set up DMA, parport is the primary user of legacy i8237 dma infrastructure.Confusion reigns.
To which "earlier patch" do you refer?
The one named "init-dma-masks-in-pnp_dev.patch" in 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 ...