Fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: nfsd/2852
PATCH 1/1 Fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: nfsd/2852
Hi,
While running some tests on 2.6.20-rt8 with DEBUG_PREEMPT on, I hit the following BUG:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: nfsd/2852 caller is drain_array+0x25/0x132 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8026d828>] dump_trace+0xbd/0x3d8 [<ffffffff8026db87>] show_trace+0x44/0x6d [<ffffffff8026ddc8>] dump_stack+0x13/0x15 [<ffffffff80355e2e>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe3/0xf1 [<ffffffff802e01b5>] drain_array+0x25/0x132 [<ffffffff802e07ac>] __cache_shrink+0xd5/0x1a6 [<ffffffff802e0a47>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x6c/0xe3 [<ffffffff8846c809>] :nfsd:nfsd4_free_slab+0x16/0x21 [<ffffffff8846c824>] :nfsd:nfsd4_free_slabs+0x10/0x36 [<ffffffff8846daf9>] :nfsd:nfs4_state_shutdown+0x1a2/0x1ae [<ffffffff884570f8>] :nfsd:nfsd_last_thread+0x47/0x76 [<ffffffff8839463a>] :sunrpc:svc_destroy+0x8d/0xd1 [<ffffffff88394738>] :sunrpc:svc_exit_thread+0xba/0xc6 [<ffffffff8845795f>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x2a3/0x2b8 [<ffffffff802600f8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00000001 ]
| 1-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
.. [<ffffffff80355ddb>] .... debug_smp_processor_id+0x90/0xf1
.....[<ffffffff802e01b5>] .. ( <= drain_array+0x25/0x132)
This patch fixes the above issue which arises due to the call to smp_processor_id in drain_array() from mm/slab.c. smp_processor_id() invocation is redundant here, as the call to slab_spin_lock_irq() already fills the value of this_cpu using raw_smp_processor_id().
o Patch to fix BUG in drain_array()
Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita2in.ibm.com>
--
slab.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/slab.c +1 -2
@@ -4121,8 +4121,7 @@int drain_array (struct kmem_cache *cachep,struct kmem_list3 *l3,struct array_cache *ac,int force,int node) { -int this_cpu =smp_processor_id (); -int tofree; +int tofree, this_cpu;if (!ac || !ac->avail)return 0 ;
Regards,
Signature · 4 lines
Ankita Garg ([email protected]) Linux Technology Center IBM India Systems & Technology Labs, Bangalore, India
Ingo Molnar
AppliedQuoted 7 lines · Ankita Garg
While running some tests on 2.6.20-rt8 with
DEBUG_PREEMPTon, I hit the following BUG:This patch fixes the above issue which arises due to the call to
smp_processor_idindrain_array()frommm/slab.c.smp_processor_id()invocation is redundant here, as the call toslab_spin_lock_irq()already fills the value ofthis_cpuusingraw_smp_processor_id().
thanks, applied!
Ingo