Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers
The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits stuck around. This patch removes the few leftovers.
The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file.
---
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt | 1 - arch/arm26/defconfig | 1 - arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig | 1 - arch/um/config.release | 1 - include/linux/ncp_fs.h | 2 -- 5 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt +0 -1
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments 0x00 00-1F linux/wavefront.h conflict! 0x02 all linux/fd.h 0x03 all linux/hdreg.h -0x04 all linux/umsdos_fs.h 0x06 all linux/lp.h 0x09 all linux/md.h 0x12 all linux/fs.h
arch/arm26/defconfig +0 -1
@@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=y # CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_MSDOS_FS is not set -# CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set # CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig +0 -1
@@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y # CONFIG_BFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_MSDOS_FS is not set -# CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set # CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
arch/um/config.release +0 -1
@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ CONFIG_JBD=y # CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FAT_FS=y CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=y -CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS=y CONFIG_VFAT_FS=y CONFIG_EFS_FS=m # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
include/linux/ncp_fs.h +0 -2
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ struct ncp_nls_ioctl#include <linux/ncp_fs_i.h> #include <linux/ncp_fs_sb.h> -/* undef because public define in umsdos_fs.h (ncp_fs.h isn't public) */ -#undef PRINTK/* define because it is easy to change PRINTK to {*}PRINTK */ #define PRINTK(format, args...) printk(KERN_DEBUG format , ## args)
H. Peter Anvin
NAKQuoted 19 lines · Jesper Juhl
The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits stuck around. This patch removes the few leftovers.
The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file.Signed-off-by Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>---
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt | 1 - arch/arm26/defconfig | 1 - arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig | 1 - arch/um/config.release | 1 - include/linux/ncp_fs.h | 2 -- 5 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)Documentation/ioctl-number.txt +0
-0
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt Code Seq# Include File Comments · line 72
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt +0
-1@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments 0x00 00-1F linux/wavefront.h conflict! 0x02 all linux/fd.h 0x03 all linux/hdreg.h -0x04 all linux/umsdos_fs.h 0x06 all linux/lp.h 0x09 all linux/md.h 0x12 all linux/fs.h
NAK!
We should at least document which ioctl numbers have been burned, since they SHOULD NOT be reused.
-hpa
Quoted 7 lines · On Friday 25 May 2007 01:07:17 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Quoted 6 lines · Jesper Juhl
The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits stuck around. This patch removes the few leftovers.
The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file.Signed-off-by Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>---
[snip]
Quoted 13 lines
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt Code Seq# Include File Comments · line 72
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt +0
-1@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments 0x00 00-1F linux/wavefront.h conflict! 0x02 all linux/fd.h 0x03 all linux/hdreg.h -0x04 all linux/umsdos_fs.h 0x06 all linux/lp.h 0x09 all linux/md.h 0x12 all linux/fs.hNAK!
Quoted 3 lines
We should at least document which ioctl numbers have been burned, since they SHOULD NOT be reused.
Ok, that makes sense. How about this version :
The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits stuck around. This patch removes the few leftovers.
The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file and the ioctl number in Documentation/ioctl-number.txt as documentation.
---
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt | 2 +- arch/arm26/defconfig | 1 - arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig | 1 - arch/um/config.release | 1 - include/linux/ncp_fs.h | 2 -- 5 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt +1 -1
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments 0x00 00-1F linux/wavefront.h conflict! 0x02 all linux/fd.h 0x03 all linux/hdreg.h -0x04 all linux/umsdos_fs.h +0x04 all linux/umsdos_fs.h Dead, but don't reuse this ioctl number. 0x06 all linux/lp.h 0x09 all linux/md.h 0x12 all linux/fs.h
arch/arm26/defconfig +0 -1
@@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=y # CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_MSDOS_FS is not set -# CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set # CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig +0 -1
@@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y # CONFIG_BFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_MSDOS_FS is not set -# CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set # CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
arch/um/config.release +0 -1
@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ CONFIG_JBD=y # CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FAT_FS=y CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=y -CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS=y CONFIG_VFAT_FS=y CONFIG_EFS_FS=m # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
include/linux/ncp_fs.h +0 -2
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ struct ncp_nls_ioctl#include <linux/ncp_fs_i.h> #include <linux/ncp_fs_sb.h> -/* undef because public define in umsdos_fs.h (ncp_fs.h isn't public) */ -#undef PRINTK/* define because it is easy to change PRINTK to {*}PRINTK */ #define PRINTK(format, args...) printk(KERN_DEBUG format , ## args)
Quoted 1 line · Jesper Juhl
Ok, that makes sense. How about this version :
Could you document which numbers were actually used by umsdos, instead of reserving a full block of 256? Since it's dead, it's not going to eat any more numbers.
-hpa
Quoted 7 lines · H. Peter Anvin
Quoted 1 line · Jesper Juhl
Ok, that makes sense. How about this version :
Could you document which numbers were actually used by umsdos, instead of reserving a full block of 256? Since it's dead, it's not going to eat any more numbers.
Sure, I'll dig out that information and prepare a new patch tomorrow (need to catch some sleep right now).
Signature · 3 lines
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html