2.6.22-rc4: known regressions with patches v3

PATCH Michal Piotrowski 4 participants 6 messages Jun 13, 2007 – Jun 20, 2007 1 message not in the archive

Subsystems (2)

Networking Network drivers

lore

Share & tools

lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

Michal Piotrowski

author

2007-06-13 19:58 UTC #1 lore raw

Hi all,

Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4 with patches available.

Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions

Networking

Subject : no irda0 interface (2.6.21 was OK), smsc does not find chip
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/3/16
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/[email protected]>

Handled-By Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>

Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/7/237
Status : patch was suggested

SELinux

Subject : very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/78
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Handled-By Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>

James Morris <jmorris-gx6/[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/7/334
Status : patch available

USB

Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>

Handled-By Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/[email protected]>

Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested

Regards,
Michal

Signature · 2 lines

LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/

Greg KH

2007-06-13 20:36 UTC #2 lore raw

Quoted 9 lines · Michal Piotrowski

USB
Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but
was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33 References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
Handled-By Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested

I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?

thanks,

greg k-h

Alan Stern

2007-06-13 21:02 UTC #3 lore raw

Quoted 11 lines · Greg KH

Quoted 9 lines · Michal Piotrowski
USB
Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but
was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33 References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
Handled-By Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested

Quoted 2 lines

I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?

I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our queries, we can't be certain.

Alan Stern

Paulo Pereira

2007-06-19 08:48 UTC #4 lore raw

A Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:01:54, Alan Stern escreveu:

Quoted 13 lines · Greg KH

Quoted 12 lines · Michal Piotrowski
Quoted 10 lines
USB
Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next
(f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33 References :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
Handled-By Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested

Quoted 8 lines

Quoted 2 lines
I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our queries, we can't be certain.
Alan Stern

Hi, I'am writting for tell that the patch work well, I have Ktorrent working for 3 days and there is no Kernel Panic!!!! But I'am using Kernel 2.6.22-rc4 with the patch that you send!!
Thank you, Paulo

Greg KH

2007-06-20 07:00 UTC #5 lore raw

Quoted 21 lines · Paulo Pereira

A Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:01:54, Alan Stern escreveu:
Quoted 20 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 12 lines · Michal Piotrowski
Quoted 10 lines
USB
Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next
(f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33 References :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
Handled-By Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested
Quoted 2 lines
I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our queries, we can't be certain.

Quoted 5 lines

Quoted 1 line
Alan Stern
Hi, I'am writting for tell that the patch work well, I have Ktorrent working for 3 days and there is no Kernel Panic!!!! But I'am using Kernel 2.6.22-rc4 with the patch that you send!!

Ok, it's queued up for after 2.6.22 is out as it is not a regression and is kind of intrusive.

Unless others think it should go in now?

thanks,

greg k-h

Paulo Pereira

2007-06-14 07:57 UTC #6 lore raw

In reply to Greg KH

A Wednesday 13 June 2007 21:35:02, Greg KH escreveu:

Quoted 11 lines · Michal Piotrowski

Quoted 9 lines
USB
Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794),
but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
Handled-By Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested

Quoted 6 lines

I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
thanks,
greg k-h

No I haven't fix the problem... I'am waiting for a friend that is in
holiday's and work's with linux well. I'am beginer in linux and I can't put the patch to work, because of that I'am waiting for him to see if the patch work.
Sorry, the fact I don't say anything about the problem but my friend comes
this week and them we put the patch and I will tell something!! Regards, Paulo.