Test case for "git diff" outside a git repo
PATCH 1/1 Test case for "git diff" outside a git repo
---
git-diff --quiet is pretty broken right now. If you do "strace git diff --quiet file1 file2" you will see that it never calls open() on either file! And it always returns a zero exit code whether or not the files are different.
I'm trying to follow the code to figure out what's going on, but meanwhile, here's a test case. Perhaps someone more familiar with the diff code will beat me to a fix.
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh new file +26 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='test git diff outside a repo' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +rm -rf .git + +test_expect_success setup ' + + echo content1 >file1a && + echo content1 >file1b && + echo content2 >file2 +' + +test_expect_success 'zero return value with --quiet for different files' ' + + git diff --quiet file1a file2 +' + +test_expect_success 'nonzero return value with --quiet for identical files' ' + + ! git diff --quiet file1a file1b >/dev/null +' + +test_done
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.rc2.4.g726f9
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 8 lines · Steven Grimm
Signed-off-by Steven Grimm <[email protected]>---
git-diff --quiet is pretty broken right now. If you do "strace git diff --quiet file1 file2" you will see that it never callsopen()on either file! And it always returns a zero exit code whether or not the files are different.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I'm trying to follow the code to figure out what's going on, but meanwhile, here's a test case. Perhaps someone more familiar with the diff code will beat me to a fix.
The code to do "untracked diff" is an ugly stepchild and not really part of git-diff proper. In fact, --quiet also is an afterthought and I would not be too surprised if the "untracked diff" code does not work with it.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh new file +0
-0
Quoted 8 lines
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh line 7
Quoted 8 lines
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh new file +7
-0@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='test git diff outside a repo' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +rm -rf .git
Unless you are testing the t/ directory and git.git suite from a tarball, the only effect of this is to make t/trash controlled by its ../../.git repository (i.e. the git.git repository). You are still inside a git repository.
Hi,
Quoted 12 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 8 lines · Steven Grimm
Signed-off-by Steven Grimm <[email protected]>---
git-diff --quiet is pretty broken right now. If you do "strace git diff --quiet file1 file2" you will see that it never callsopen()on either file! And it always returns a zero exit code whether or not the files are different.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I'm trying to follow the code to figure out what's going on, but meanwhile, here's a test case. Perhaps someone more familiar with the diff code will beat me to a fix.
The code to do "untracked diff" is an ugly stepchild and not really part of git-diff proper. In fact, --quiet also is an afterthought and I would not be too surprised if the "untracked diff" code does not work with it.
Not that ugly, mind you. Every third day or so I congratulate myself for having "git diff --color-words" or "git diff -M", without having to suffer initialising a git repository.
But yes, I agree, the --quiet code came after the --no-index code, and thus it is well possible that the latter ignores the former.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='test git diff outside a repo' +
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh line 7
Quoted 3 lines
t/t4021-diff-norepo.sh new file +3
-0+. ./test-lib.sh + +rm -rf .gitUnless you are testing the t/ directory and git.git suite from a tarball, the only effect of this is to make t/trash controlled by its ../../.git repository (i.e. the git.git repository). You are still inside a git repository.
Yes, this is no good.
However, you can force --no-index. IMHO that is the way to go.
Ciao,
Dscho