drivers/char/sonypi.c: fix ids member of struct acpi_driver
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 drivers/char/sonypi.c: fix ids member of struct acpi_driver
ids member of struct acpi_driver is of type struct acpi_device_id, not a character array.
--- drivers/char/sonypi.c | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/char/sonypi.c +7 -1
@@ -1147,10 +1147,16 @@ static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)return 0 ; } +const static struct acpi_device_id sonypi_device_ids[] = { + {"SNY6001" ,0 }, + {"" ,0 }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, sonypi_device_ids); +static struct acpi_driver sonypi_acpi_driver = { .name ="sonypi" , .class ="hkey" , - .ids ="SNY6001" , + .ids = sonypi_device_ids, .ops = { .add = sonypi_acpi_add, .remove = sonypi_acpi_remove,
Mattia Dongili
maintainerQuoted 13 lines · Eugene Teo
ids member of struct
acpi_driveris of type structacpi_device_id, not a character array.Signed-off-by Eugene Teo <[email protected]>--- drivers/char/sonypi.c | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/char/sonypi.c +0
-0
drivers/char/sonypi.c static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type) · line 1154
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/char/sonypi.c +5
-0@@ -1147,10 +1147,16 @@ static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)return 0 ; } +const static struct acpi_device_id sonypi_device_ids[] = { + {"SNY6001" ,0 }, + {"" ,0 }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, sonypi_device_ids);
how does it behave with the already existing id in sony-laptop? I'd rather avoid the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for sonypi allowing sony-laptop to take over automagically.
Signature · 2 lines
mattia :wq!
Quoted 17 lines · Mattia Dongili
Quoted 16 lines · Eugene Teo
ids member of struct
acpi_driveris of type structacpi_device_id, not a character array.Signed-off-by Eugene Teo <[email protected]>--- drivers/char/sonypi.c | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/char/sonypi.c +0
-0@@ -1147,10 +1147,16 @@ static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)return 0 ; }
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/char/sonypi.c static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type) · line 1154
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/char/sonypi.c +5
-0+const static struct acpi_device_id sonypi_device_ids[] = { + {"SNY6001" ,0 }, + {"" ,0 }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, sonypi_device_ids);how does it behave with the already existing id in sony-laptop? I'd rather avoid the
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLEfor sonypi allowing sony-laptop to take over automagically.
Yes, sounds reasonable.
The patch is needed, but MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE should be ripped out. AFAIK sonypi and sony-laptop cannot coexist together. But sony-acpi should be preferred. If someone needs sonypi, he needs to blacklist sony-apci in modprobe.conf and load sonypi manually.
Shouldn't sony-acpi replace sonypi on longterm or at least addtional "SNY6001" functionality be merged to sony-acpi? Having two drivers for the same device is not a good idea.
Thanks,
Thomas
Mattia Dongili
maintainerQuoted 28 lines · Thomas Renninger
Quoted 17 lines · Mattia Dongili
Quoted 16 lines · Eugene Teo
ids member of struct
acpi_driveris of type structacpi_device_id, not a character array.Signed-off-by Eugene Teo <[email protected]>--- drivers/char/sonypi.c | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/char/sonypi.c +0
-0@@ -1147,10 +1147,16 @@ static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)return 0 ; }Quoted 9 lines
drivers/char/sonypi.c static int sonypi_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type) · line 1154
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/char/sonypi.c +5
-0+const static struct acpi_device_id sonypi_device_ids[] = { + {"SNY6001" ,0 }, + {"" ,0 }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, sonypi_device_ids);how does it behave with the already existing id in sony-laptop? I'd rather avoid the
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLEfor sonypi allowing sony-laptop to take over automagically.
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, sounds reasonable.
The patch is needed, butMODULE_DEVICE_TABLEshould be ripped out. AFAIK sonypi and sony-laptop cannot coexist together. But sony-acpi should be preferred. If someone needs sonypi, he needs to blacklist sony-apci in modprobe.conf and load sonypi manually.
Yes, that's what I meant.
Quoted 3 lines
Shouldn't sony-acpi replace sonypi on longterm or at least addtional "SNY6001" functionality be merged to sony-acpi? Having two drivers for the same device is not a good idea.
yep, sony-laptop will replace sonypi. It still has some problems but development is progressing in sony-laptop, not sonypi.
Eugene, I'll import the patch without the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE line. cheers
Signature · 2 lines
mattia :wq!
Hi Mattia,
<quote sender="Mattia Dongili">
Quoted 7 lines · Thomas Renninger
Quoted 6 lines · Mattia Dongili
Quoted 5 lines · Eugene Teo
Quoted 4 lines
ids member of struct
acpi_driveris of type structacpi_device_id, not a character array.Signed-off-by Eugene Teo <[email protected]>
[...]
Quoted 4 lines
yep, sony-laptop will replace sonypi. It still has some problems but development is progressing in sony-laptop, not sonypi.
Eugene, I'll import the patch without the
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLEline.
Ok, thanks.
Eugene