Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Documentation/00-INDEX notice ecryptfs.txt moved.

PATCH In review Rob Landley 4 participants 6 messages Aug 30, 2007 – Aug 31, 2007 Documentation

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Documentation/00-INDEX notice ecryptfs.txt moved.

ecryptfs.txt moved into Documentation/filesystems, so move the 00-INDEX entry.

Documentation/00-INDEX +0 -2
@@ -134,8 +134,6 @@
 	- info on Linux Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) subsystem.
 early-userspace/
 	- info about initramfs, klibc, and userspace early during boot.
-ecryptfs.txt
-	- docs on eCryptfs: stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux.
 eisa.txt
 	- info on EISA bus support.
 exception.txt
Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +2 -0
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
 	- info about the locking scheme used for directory operations.
 dlmfs.txt
 	- info on the userspace interface to the OCFS2 DLM.
+ecryptfs.txt
+	- docs on eCryptfs: stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux.
 ext2.txt
 	- info, mount options and specifications for the Ext2 filesystem.
 ext3.txt
Signature · 2 lines
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:46:17 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:

ecryptfs.txt moved into Documentation/filesystems, so move the 00-INDEX entry.

Please use the expected (canonical) patch format.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
14) The canonical patch format

Additional help:
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt
http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html

Thanks.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

#2 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Randy Dunlap

Please use the expected (canonical) patch format.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
14) The canonical patch format

from Rob Landley <[email protected]>

ecryptfs.txt moved into filesystems, make 00-INDEX follow.

---

 00-INDEX             |    2 --
 filesystems/00-INDEX |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/00-INDEX +0 -2
@@ -134,8 +134,6 @@
 	- info on Linux Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) subsystem.
 early-userspace/
 	- info about initramfs, klibc, and userspace early during boot.
-ecryptfs.txt
-	- docs on eCryptfs: stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux.
 eisa.txt
 	- info on EISA bus support.
 exception.txt
Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +2 -0
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
 	- info about the locking scheme used for directory operations.
 dlmfs.txt
 	- info on the userspace interface to the OCFS2 DLM.
+ecryptfs.txt
+	- docs on eCryptfs: stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux.
 ext2.txt
 	- info, mount options and specifications for the Ext2 filesystem.
 ext3.txt
Signature · 2 lines
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
#3 lore raw

Hi Rob,

Quoted 10 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines · Randy Dunlap

Please use the expected (canonical) patch format.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
14) The canonical patch format

from Rob Landley <[email protected]>

ecryptfs.txt moved into filesystems, make 00-INDEX follow.

That's still not quite right :-) What Randy meant is that the sign-off must come /after/ the patch description:

From: Random J Hacker <[email protected]>
/*
* Above line not really required if it's your own patch that you're
* sending. But required when you're "relaying" someone else's patch,
* or if there are multiple people in the sign-off chain below,
* to differentiate as to who was the author of the patch. */

[PATCH] <subsystem>: <one-line summary>
/*
* Above line not really required if Subject: of email already such.
* But may be required if you're replying on some other LKML thread,
* whose subject may have nothing to do with this patch. */

<a few line(s) of patch description,

maybe a couple of paragraphs even.>

/*
* It is generally preferable to order the sign-off's above so that
* they reflect the patch journey -- so the original author preferably
* comes first, then those who relayed it or picked it up from the
* author (often the maintainer), and so on, till the person who is
* finally relaying it currently (so from the above it seems this is
* being sent out by Bob). If this is the first time a patch is being
* sent, there would naturally be just a single sign-off line. */

Then three hyphens, followed by diffstat and patch ... so the below looks good :-)

[ All this is not too important, admittedly, but causes least amount of
processing time to be wasted on the recipient's end, and also does not confuse scripts that may be used to extract patches (and git commit command-line arguments) from mails automatically. ]

Quoted 28 lines

---

 00-INDEX             |    2 --
 filesystems/00-INDEX |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/00-INDEX +0 -2
@@ -134,8 +134,6 @@
 	- info on Linux Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) subsystem.
 early-userspace/
 	- info about initramfs, klibc, and userspace early during boot.
-ecryptfs.txt
-	- docs on eCryptfs: stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux.
 eisa.txt
 	- info on EISA bus support.
 exception.txt
Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +2 -0
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
 	- info about the locking scheme used for directory operations.
 dlmfs.txt
 	- info on the userspace interface to the OCFS2 DLM.
+ecryptfs.txt
+	- docs on eCryptfs: stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux.
 ext2.txt
 	- info, mount options and specifications for the Ext2 filesystem.
 ext3.txt
#4 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Satyam Sharma

Hi Rob,

Quoted 6 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines · Randy Dunlap

Please use the expected (canonical) patch format.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
14) The canonical patch format

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

from Rob Landley <[email protected]>

ecryptfs.txt moved into filesystems, make 00-INDEX follow.

That's still not quite right :-) What Randy meant is that the sign-off must come /after/ the patch description:

Randy emailed me about it offline and I updated my wrapper script.

I've always had a bit of a blind spot when it comes to filling out forms (I suck at bureaucracy), so I made a script to do it, currently:

#!/bin/bash

echo "From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>" echo
echo "Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[email protected]>" echo "---"
echo
cat $1 | diffstat
echo
cat $1

I note that the example uses "From:" but the summary refers to it as the "from" line with no capital letter or colon, and unix being case sensitive I reproduced the quoted string verbatim. (See "I suck at bureaucracy", above.)

Quoted 4 lines

[ All this is not too important, admittedly, but causes least amount of
processing time to be wasted on the recipient's end, and also does not confuse scripts that may be used to extract patches (and git commit command-line arguments) from mails automatically. ]

If it's going to be parsed by a script, it might as well be generated by a script...

I've got another dozen of these patches to send, but I'm waiting to see which ones Jesper Juhl has queued up first. :)

(Between the two of us, we'll get this updated eventually...)

Rob

Signature · 2 lines
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
#5 lore raw
Quoted 20 lines · On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:56:10 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
Quoted 9 lines · Satyam Sharma

Hi Rob,

Quoted 6 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines · Randy Dunlap

Please use the expected (canonical) patch format.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
14) The canonical patch format

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

from Rob Landley <[email protected]>

ecryptfs.txt moved into filesystems, make 00-INDEX follow.

That's still not quite right :-) What Randy meant is that the sign-off must come /after/ the patch description:

Randy emailed me about it offline and I updated my wrapper script.

Quoted 7 lines

I've always had a bit of a blind spot when it comes to filling out forms (I suck at bureaucracy), so I made a script to do it, currently:

#!/bin/bash

echo "From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>"
echo

or: echo put_changelog_here

Quoted 4 lines

echo "Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[email protected]>" echo "---"
echo
cat $1 | diffstat

cat $1 | diffstat -p1 -w70

Quoted 8 lines

echo
cat $1

I note that the example uses "From:" but the summary refers to it as the "from" line with no capital letter or colon, and unix being case sensitive I reproduced the quoted string verbatim. (See "I suck at bureaucracy", above.)

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

[ All this is not too important, admittedly, but causes least amount of
processing time to be wasted on the recipient's end, and also does not confuse scripts that may be used to extract patches (and git commit command-line arguments) from mails automatically. ]

If it's going to be parsed by a script, it might as well be generated by a script...

yep.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***