MPC8568E-MDS: create localbus node
Subsystems (3)
RFC PATCH 1/2 MPC8568E-MDS: create localbus node
This patch creates localbus node, moves bcsr into it, and adds localbus to the probe path.
---
Patch is against galak/powerpc.git master branch.
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts | 14 +++++++++++--- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +11 -3
@@ -42,9 +42,17 @@ reg = <00000000 10000000>; }; - bcsr@f8000000 { - device_type = "board-control"; - reg = <f8000000 8000>; + localbus@f0000000 { + compatible = "fsl,mpc8568mds-localbus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <1>; + reg = <f0000000 10000000>; + ranges = <0 0 f8000000 0008000>; + + bcsr@0,0 { + device_type = "board-control"; + reg = <0 0 8000>; + }; }; soc8568@e0000000 {
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c +1 -0
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_ids[] = { { .type = "soc", }, { .compatible = "soc", }, { .type = "qe", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8568mds-localbus", }, {}, };
Signature · 1 line
1.5.0.6
Quoted 10 lines · Anton Vorontsov
This patch creates localbus node, moves bcsr into it, and adds localbus to the probe path.
Signed-off-by Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +0
-0
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 46
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-3@@ -42,9 +42,17 @@ reg = <00000000 10000000>; }; - bcsr@f8000000 { - device_type = "board-control"; - reg = <f8000000 8000>; + localbus@f0000000 { + compatible = "fsl,mpc8568mds-localbus";
Is the entity described as "localbus" indeed so *board* specific?
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 50
Quoted 4 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +4
-0+ #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <1>; + reg = <f0000000 10000000>; + ranges = <0 0 f8000000 0008000>;
Isn't that range a part of "reg"?
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 58
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +5
-0+ + bcsr@0,0 { + device_type = "board-control"; + reg = <0 0 8000>; + }; }; soc8568@e0000000 {
WBR, Sergei
Quoted 7 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Quoted 4 lines · Anton Vorontsov
This patch creates localbus node, moves bcsr into it, and adds localbus to the probe path.
Signed-off-by Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>
Quoted 9 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 44
Quoted 9 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +0
-0@@ -42,9 +42,17 @@ reg = <00000000 10000000>; }; - bcsr@f8000000 {
Heh, this is wrong.
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 46
Quoted 4 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-2- device_type = "board-control"; - reg = <f8000000 8000>; + localbus@f0000000 { + compatible = "fsl,mpc8568mds-localbus";Is the entity described as "localbus" indeed so *board* specific?
That's what booting-without-of.txt gives as an example.
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 50
Quoted 4 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +4
-0+ #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <1>; + reg = <f0000000 10000000>; + ranges = <0 0 f8000000 0008000>;Isn't that range a part of "reg"?
Heh. Right you are.
Quoted 2 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 52
Quoted 2 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-0+ + bcsr@0,0 {
Hrm, wrong.
Quoted 7 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 58
Quoted 5 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +3
-0+ device_type = "board-control"; + reg = <0 0 8000>; + }; }; soc8568@e0000000 {WBR, Sergei
I'll repost fixed version shortly.
Thanks,
Signature · 4 lines
Anton Vorontsov email: [email protected] backup email: [email protected] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
RFC PATCH v2 1/2 MPC8568E-MDS: create localbus node
This patch creates localbus node, moves bcsr into it, and adds localbus to the probe path.
---
Notice that localbus control registers are in the soc address space, but ranges are not. Just the same situation as with PCI nodes.
Patch is against galak/powerpc.git master branch.
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts | 14 +++++++++++--- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +11 -3
@@ -42,9 +42,17 @@ reg = <00000000 10000000>; }; - bcsr@f8000000 { - device_type = "board-control"; - reg = <f8000000 8000>; + localbus@e0005000 { + compatible = "fsl,mpc8568mds-localbus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <1>; + reg = <e0005000 d8>; + ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000>; + + bcsr@1,0 { + device_type = "board-control"; + reg = <1 0 8000>; + }; }; soc8568@e0000000 {
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c +1 -0
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_ids[] = { { .type = "soc", }, { .compatible = "soc", }, { .type = "qe", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8568mds-localbus", }, {}, };
Signature · 1 line
1.5.0.6
PATCH v2 2/2 MPC8568E-MDS: add support for flash
In reply to Anton VorontsovMPC8568E-MDS have 1 32MB Spansion x16 CFI flash chip. Let's use it.
---
Patch is against galak/powerpc.git master branch.
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +34 -1
@@ -47,12 +47,45 @@ #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <1>; reg = <e0005000 d8>; - ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000>; + ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000 + 0 0 fe000000 2000000>; bcsr@1,0 { device_type = "board-control"; reg = <1 0 8000>; }; + + flash@0,0 { + compatible = "Spansion,S29GL256N11TFIV2O", "cfi-flash"; + reg = <0 0 2000000>; + probe-type = "CFI"; + bank-width = <2>; + device-width = <1>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + hrcw@0 { + label = "hrcw"; + reg = <0 20001>; + read-only; + }; + + kernel@20000 { + label = "kernel"; + reg = <20000 200000>; + }; + + rootfs@220000 { + label = "rootfs"; + reg = <220000 1d60000>; + }; + + uboot@1f80000 { + label = "u-boot"; + reg = <1f80000 80000>; + read-only; + }; + }; }; soc8568@e0000000 {
Signature · 1 line
1.5.0.6
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8568E-MDS: add support for flash
Quoted 15 lines · Anton Vorontsov
MPC8568E-MDS have 1 32MB Spansion x16 CFI flash chip. Let's use it.
Signed-off-by Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-1@@ -47,12 +47,45 @@ #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <1>; reg = <e0005000 d8>; - ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000>; + ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000 + 0 0 fe000000 2000000>;
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 61
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +5
-0bcsr@1,0 { device_type = "board-control"; reg = <1 0 8000>; }; + + flash@0,0 { + compatible = "Spansion,S29GL256N11TFIV2O", "cfi-flash"; + reg = <0 0 2000000>; + probe-type = "CFI";
I don't get it -- has physmap_of.c rewrite been already committed?
If yes, you don't need probe_type; if no, your "compatible" won't work... Well, I see that the driver rewrite has been committed (when I wasn't looking 8-)...
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 69
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +8
-0+ bank-width = <2>; + device-width = <1>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + hrcw@0 { + label = "hrcw"; + reg = <0 20001>;
What?! Odd sized partition? Don't try to follow both the old and new
partition device tree specs -- you'll only get yourself into trouble with this. The size-cell doesn't bear r/o flag in the new paritions spec.
Quoted 7 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +7
-0+ read-only; + }; + + kernel@20000 { + label = "kernel"; + reg = <20000 200000>; + };
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 86
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +10
-0+ + rootfs@220000 { + label = "rootfs"; + reg = <220000 1d60000>; + }; + + uboot@1f80000 { + label = "u-boot"; + reg = <1f80000 80000>; + read-only;
Well, this is not even consistent... :-)
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 89
Quoted 3 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-0+ }; + }; };
WBR, Sergei
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8568E-MDS: add support for flash
Quoted 18 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Quoted 16 lines · Anton Vorontsov
MPC8568E-MDS have 1 32MB Spansion x16 CFI flash chip. Let's use it.
Signed-off-by Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-1@@ -47,12 +47,45 @@ #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <1>; reg = <e0005000 d8>; - ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000>; + ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000 + 0 0 fe000000 2000000>;
Quoted 14 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 61
Quoted 9 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +5
-0bcsr@1,0 { device_type = "board-control"; reg = <1 0 8000>; }; + + flash@0,0 { + compatible = "Spansion,S29GL256N11TFIV2O", "cfi-flash"; + reg = <0 0 2000000>; + probe-type = "CFI";I don't get it -- has
physmap_of.crewrite been already committed?
If yes, you don't needprobe_type; if no, your "compatible" won't work... Well, I see that the driver rewrite has been committed (when I wasn't looking 8-)...
Any NOR flash nodes should conform to the "new" bindings from David Gibson, et al. Not sure about the status of those being in physmap_of.c w/regards to 2.6.24.
- k
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8568E-MDS: add support for flash
Quoted 39 lines · Kumar Gala
Quoted 19 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Quoted 17 lines · Anton Vorontsov
MPC8568E-MDS have 1 32MB Spansion x16 CFI flash chip. Let's use it.
Signed-off-by Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>arch/powerpc/ renamed from arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +0
-0
boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts
index 8e15dba..1198363 100644arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-1@@ -47,12 +47,45 @@ #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <1>; reg = <e0005000 d8>; - ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000>; + ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000 + 0 0 fe000000 2000000>;Quoted 16 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 61
Quoted 9 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +5
-0bcsr@1,0 { device_type = "board-control"; reg = <1 0 8000>; }; + + flash@0,0 { + compatible = "Spansion,S29GL256N11TFIV2O", "cfi-flash"; + reg = <0 0 2000000>; + probe-type = "CFI";I don't get it -- has
physmap_of.crewrite been already committed?
If yes, you don't needprobe_type; if no, your "compatible" won't work...
Well, I see that the driver rewrite has been committed (when I wasn't looking
8-)...
Quoted 3 lines
Any NOR flash nodes should conform to the "new" bindings from David Gibson, et al. Not sure about the status of those being in
physmap_of.cw/regards to 2.6.24.
Yes, in which case probe_type should be dropped, as should the low bit in the read-only partitions.
Signature · 4 lines
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8568E-MDS: add support for flash
In reply to Sergei ShtylyovQuoted 22 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Quoted 20 lines · Anton Vorontsov
MPC8568E-MDS have 1 32MB Spansion x16 CFI flash chip. Let's use it.
Signed-off-by Anton Vorontsov <[email protected]>arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-1@@ -47,12 +47,45 @@ #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <1>; reg = <e0005000 d8>; - ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000>; + ranges = <1 0 f8000000 0008000 + 0 0 fe000000 2000000>; bcsr@1,0 { device_type = "board-control"; reg = <1 0 8000>; };
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 61
Quoted 5 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +5
-0+ + flash@0,0 { + compatible = "Spansion,S29GL256N11TFIV2O", "cfi-flash"; + reg = <0 0 2000000>; + probe-type = "CFI";I don't get it -- has
physmap_of.crewrite been already committed?
If yes, you don't needprobe_type; if no, your "compatible" won't work...
I see.
/* Helper function to handle probing of the obsolete "direct-mapped"
* compatible binding, which has an extra "probe-type" property [...]
Obsolete, very good.
Quoted 14 lines
Well, I see that the driver rewrite has been committed (when I wasn't looking 8-)...
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 69
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +8
-0+ bank-width = <2>; + device-width = <1>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + hrcw@0 { + label = "hrcw"; + reg = <0 20001>;What?! Odd sized partition? Don't try to follow both the old and new
partition device tree specs -- you'll only get yourself into trouble with this. The size-cell doesn't bear r/o flag in the new paritions spec.
Thanks for spotting this. It's, of course, forward-porting "thinko".
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +11
-0+ read-only; + }; + + kernel@20000 { + label = "kernel"; + reg = <20000 200000>; + }; + + rootfs@220000 { + label = "rootfs"; + reg = <220000 1d60000>;
Quoted 8 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 86
Quoted 6 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +6
-0+ }; + + uboot@1f80000 { + label = "u-boot"; + reg = <1f80000 80000>; + read-only;Well, this is not even consistent... :-)
Yup, it was a thinko in the hrcw node, not something I really meant to spread over all ro nodes.
Quoted 5 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts line 89
Quoted 3 lines
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts +2
-0+ }; + }; };WBR, Sergei
Much thanks for the review,
Signature · 4 lines
Anton Vorontsov email: [email protected] backup email: [email protected] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
Quoted 4 lines · Anton Vorontsov
Quoted 1 line · Sergei Shtylyov
Is the entity described as "localbus" indeed so *board* specific?
That's what booting-without-of.txt gives as an example.
The board should have been left out of that. Your compatible should be something like "fsl,mpc8568-localbus", possibly with some canonical mpc85xx chip as well, chosen to represent 85xx localbus in general.
-Scott
Quoted 9 lines · Scott Wood
Quoted 4 lines · Anton Vorontsov
Quoted 1 line · Sergei Shtylyov
Is the entity described as "localbus" indeed so *board* specific?
That's what booting-without-of.txt gives as an example.
The board should have been left out of that. Your compatible should be something like "fsl,mpc8568-localbus", possibly with some canonical mpc85xx chip as well, chosen to represent 85xx localbus in general.
Lets be careful, there are at least two forms of localbus on 85xx.
- k
Quoted 7 lines · Kumar Gala
Quoted 4 lines · Scott Wood
Quoted 3 lines · Anton Vorontsov
Quoted 1 line · Sergei Shtylyov
Is the entity described as "localbus" indeed so *board* specific?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
That's what booting-without-of.txt gives as an example.
The board should have been left out of that. Your compatible should be something like "fsl,mpc8568-localbus", possibly with some canonical mpc85xx chip as well, chosen to represent 85xx localbus in general.
Lets be careful, there are at least two forms of localbus on 85xx.
Do you mean LAWBAR v. BRn/ORn (the manuals refer to the latter as "localbus", so I'd be inclined to stick with that name, and call the former mpc8568-lawbar or something), or some 85xx being different than others?
-Scott