: field name identifier conventions
RFC PATCH 1/1 : field name identifier conventions
Arnaldo can you please indicate if you are ok with this - there are other Ack Vector patches in the pipeline, and I would change them accordingly.
---------------------> Patch <--------------------------------------------------- [ACKVEC]: Reduce length of identifiers
This is reduces the length of the struct ackvec/ackvec_record fields. It is a purely text-based replacement:
s#dccpavr_#avr_#g; s#dccpav_#av_#g;
and increases readability somewhat.
--- net/dccp/ackvec.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- net/dccp/ackvec.h | 62 ++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
net/dccp/ackvec.h +31 -31
@@ -32,54 +32,54 @@* * This data structure is the one defined in RFC 4340, Appendix A. * -* @dccpav_buf_head - circular buffer head -* @dccpav_buf_tail - circular buffer tail -* @dccpav_buf_ackno - ack # of the most recent packet acknowledgeable in the -* buffer (i.e. %dccpav_buf_head) -* @dccpav_buf_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces on all packets acked +* @av_buf_head - circular buffer head +* @av_buf_tail - circular buffer tail +* @av_buf_ackno - ack # of the most recent packet acknowledgeable in the +* buffer (i.e. %av_buf_head) +* @av_buf_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces on all packets acked * by the buffer with State 0 * * Additionally, the HC-Receiver must keep some information about the * Ack Vectors it has recently sent. For each packet sent carrying an * Ack Vector, it remembers four variables: * -* @dccpav_records - list of dccp_ackvec_record -* @dccpav_ack_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces for all State 0. +* @av_records - list of dccp_ackvec_record +* @av_ack_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces for all State 0. * -* @dccpav_time - the time in usecs -* @dccpav_buf - circular buffer of acknowledgeable packets +* @av_time - the time in usecs +* @av_buf - circular buffer of acknowledgeable packets */ struct dccp_ackvec { -u64 dccpav_buf_ackno; -struct list_head dccpav_records; -ktime_t dccpav_time; -u16 dccpav_buf_head; -u16 dccpav_vec_len; -u8 dccpav_buf_nonce; -u8 dccpav_ack_nonce; -u8 dccpav_buf[DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ]; +u64 av_buf_ackno; +struct list_head av_records; +ktime_t av_time; +u16 av_buf_head; +u16 av_vec_len; +u8 av_buf_nonce; +u8 av_ack_nonce; +u8 av_buf[DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ]; };/** struct dccp_ackvec_record - ack vector record * * ACK vector record as defined in Appendix A of spec. * -* The list is sorted by dccpavr_ack_seqno +* The list is sorted by avr_ack_seqno * -* @dccpavr_node - node in dccpav_records -* @dccpavr_ack_seqno - sequence number of the packet this record was sent on -* @dccpavr_ack_ackno - sequence number being acknowledged -* @dccpavr_ack_ptr - pointer into dccpav_buf where this record starts -* @dccpavr_ack_nonce - dccpav_ack_nonce at the time this record was sent -* @dccpavr_sent_len - lenght of the record in dccpav_buf +* @avr_node - node in av_records +* @avr_ack_seqno - sequence number of the packet this record was sent on +* @avr_ack_ackno - sequence number being acknowledged +* @avr_ack_ptr - pointer into av_buf where this record starts +* @avr_ack_nonce - av_ack_nonce at the time this record was sent +* @avr_sent_len - lenght of the record in av_buf */ struct dccp_ackvec_record { -struct list_head dccpavr_node; -u64 dccpavr_ack_seqno; -u64 dccpavr_ack_ackno; -u16 dccpavr_ack_ptr; -u16 dccpavr_sent_len; -u8 dccpavr_ack_nonce; +struct list_head avr_node; +u64 avr_ack_seqno; +u64 avr_ack_ackno; +u16 avr_ack_ptr; +u16 avr_sent_len; +u8 avr_ack_nonce; };struct sock ;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ extern int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);static inline int dccp_ackvec_pending (const struct dccp_ackvec *av) { -return av->dccpav_vec_len; +return av->av_vec_len; }#else /* CONFIG_IP_DCCP_ACKVEC */ static inline int dccp_ackvec_init (void )
net/dccp/ackvec.c +77 -85
362 lines not on this page · raw message
I have no problems with this one. Shortens the namespace while keeping it.
- Arnaldo
Em Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:31:05PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu:
Quoted 504 lines
Arnaldo can you please indicate if you are ok with this - there are other Ack Vector patches in the pipeline, and I would change them accordingly.
---------------------> Patch <--------------------------------------------------- [ACKVEC]: Reduce length of identifiers
This is reduces the length of the struct ackvec/ackvec_record fields. It is a purely text-based replacement:
s#dccpavr_#avr_#g; s#dccpav_#av_#g;and increases readability somewhat.
Signed-off-by Gerrit Renker <[email protected]>--- net/dccp/ackvec.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- net/dccp/ackvec.h | 62 ++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)net/dccp/ackvec.h +31
-31@@ -32,54 +32,54 @@* * This data structure is the one defined in RFC 4340, Appendix A. * -* @dccpav_buf_head - circular buffer head -* @dccpav_buf_tail - circular buffer tail -* @dccpav_buf_ackno - ack # of the most recent packet acknowledgeable in the -* buffer (i.e. %dccpav_buf_head) -* @dccpav_buf_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces on all packets acked +* @av_buf_head - circular buffer head +* @av_buf_tail - circular buffer tail +* @av_buf_ackno - ack # of the most recent packet acknowledgeable in the +* buffer (i.e. %av_buf_head) +* @av_buf_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces on all packets acked * by the buffer with State 0 * * Additionally, the HC-Receiver must keep some information about the * Ack Vectors it has recently sent. For each packet sent carrying an * Ack Vector, it remembers four variables: * -* @dccpav_records - list of dccp_ackvec_record -* @dccpav_ack_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces for all State 0. +* @av_records - list of dccp_ackvec_record +* @av_ack_nonce - the one-bit sum of the ECN Nonces for all State 0. * -* @dccpav_time - the time in usecs -* @dccpav_buf - circular buffer of acknowledgeable packets +* @av_time - the time in usecs +* @av_buf - circular buffer of acknowledgeable packets */ struct dccp_ackvec { -u64 dccpav_buf_ackno; -struct list_head dccpav_records; -ktime_t dccpav_time; -u16 dccpav_buf_head; -u16 dccpav_vec_len; -u8 dccpav_buf_nonce; -u8 dccpav_ack_nonce; -u8 dccpav_buf[DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ]; +u64 av_buf_ackno; +struct list_head av_records; +ktime_t av_time; +u16 av_buf_head; +u16 av_vec_len; +u8 av_buf_nonce; +u8 av_ack_nonce; +u8 av_buf[DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ]; };/** struct dccp_ackvec_record - ack vector record * * ACK vector record as defined in Appendix A of spec. * -* The list is sorted by dccpavr_ack_seqno +* The list is sorted by avr_ack_seqno * -* @dccpavr_node - node in dccpav_records -* @dccpavr_ack_seqno - sequence number of the packet this record was sent on -* @dccpavr_ack_ackno - sequence number being acknowledged -* @dccpavr_ack_ptr - pointer into dccpav_buf where this record starts -* @dccpavr_ack_nonce - dccpav_ack_nonce at the time this record was sent -* @dccpavr_sent_len - lenght of the record in dccpav_buf +* @avr_node - node in av_records +* @avr_ack_seqno - sequence number of the packet this record was sent on +* @avr_ack_ackno - sequence number being acknowledged +* @avr_ack_ptr - pointer into av_buf where this record starts +* @avr_ack_nonce - av_ack_nonce at the time this record was sent +* @avr_sent_len - lenght of the record in av_buf */ struct dccp_ackvec_record { -struct list_head dccpavr_node; -u64 dccpavr_ack_seqno; -u64 dccpavr_ack_ackno; -u16 dccpavr_ack_ptr; -u16 dccpavr_sent_len; -u8 dccpavr_ack_nonce; +struct list_head avr_node; +u64 avr_ack_seqno; +u64 avr_ack_ackno; +u16 avr_ack_ptr; +u16 avr_sent_len; +u8 avr_ack_nonce; };struct sock ;@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ extern int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);static inline int dccp_ackvec_pending (const struct dccp_ackvec *av) { -return av->dccpav_vec_len; +return av->av_vec_len; }#else /* CONFIG_IP_DCCP_ACKVEC */ static inline int dccp_ackvec_init (void )net/dccp/ackvec.c +77
-85@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static struct dccp_ackvec_record *dccp_ackvec_record_new(void)kmem_cache_alloc (dccp_ackvec_record_slab,GFP_ATOMIC );if (avr !=NULL ) -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&avr->dccpavr_node); +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&avr->avr_node);return avr; }@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void dccp_ackvec_record_delete(struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr)if (unlikely (avr =NULL ))return ;/* Check if deleting a linked record */ -WARN_ON (!list_empty (&avr->dccpavr_node)); +WARN_ON (!list_empty (&avr->avr_node));kmem_cache_free (dccp_ackvec_record_slab, avr); }@@ -52,16 +52,15 @@ static void dccp_ackvec_insert_avr(struct dccp_ackvec *av,* just add the AVR at the head of the list. * -sorbo. */ -if (!list_empty (&av->dccpav_records)) { +if (!list_empty (&av->av_records)) { const struct dccp_ackvec_record *head > - list_entry(av->dccpav_records.next, +list_entry (av->av_records.next, struct dccp_ackvec_record, - dccpavr_node); -BUG_ON (before48 (avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno, - head->dccpavr_ack_seqno)); + avr_node); +BUG_ON (before48 (avr->avr_ack_seqno, head->avr_ack_seqno)); } -list_add (&avr->dccpavr_node, &av->dccpav_records); +list_add (&avr->avr_node, &av->av_records); }int dccp_insert_option_ackvec (struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb)@@ -69,9 +68,8 @@ int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)struct dccp_sock *dp =dccp_sk (sk);struct dccp_ackvec *av = dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec;/* Figure out how many options do we need to represent the ackvec */ -const u16 nr_opts =DIV_ROUND_UP (av->dccpav_vec_len, -DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_OPT_LEN ); -u16 len = av->dccpav_vec_len +2 * nr_opts, i; +const u16 nr_opts =DIV_ROUND_UP (av->av_vec_len,DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_OPT_LEN ); +u16 len = av->av_vec_len +2 * nr_opts, i;u32 elapsed_time;const unsigned char *tail, *from;unsigned char *to;@@ -81,7 +79,7 @@ int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)if (DCCP_SKB_CB (skb)->dccpd_opt_len + len >DCCP_MAX_OPT_LEN )return -1 ; - delta =ktime_us_delta (ktime_get_real (), av->dccpav_time); + delta =ktime_us_delta (ktime_get_real (), av->av_time); elapsed_time = delta /10 ; if (elapsed_time != 0 &&@@ -95,9 +93,9 @@ int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)DCCP_SKB_CB (skb)->dccpd_opt_len += len; to =skb_push (skb, len); - len = av->dccpav_vec_len; - from = av->dccpav_buf + av->dccpav_buf_head; - tail = av->dccpav_buf +DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ; + len = av->av_vec_len; + from = av->av_buf + av->av_buf_head; + tail = av->av_buf +DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ;for (i =0 ; i < nr_opts; ++i) {int copylen = len;@@ -116,7 +114,7 @@ int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) to += tailsize; len -= tailsize; copylen -= tailsize; - from = av->dccpav_buf; + from = av->av_buf; }memcpy (to, from, copylen);@@ -134,19 +132,19 @@ int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)* buf_head; ack_ackno will equal buf_ackno; and ack_nonce will * equal buf_nonce. */ - avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno =DCCP_SKB_CB (skb)->dccpd_seq; - avr->dccpavr_ack_ptr = av->dccpav_buf_head; - avr->dccpavr_ack_ackno = av->dccpav_buf_ackno; - avr->dccpavr_ack_nonce = av->dccpav_buf_nonce; - avr->dccpavr_sent_len = av->dccpav_vec_len; + avr->avr_ack_seqno =DCCP_SKB_CB (skb)->dccpd_seq; + avr->avr_ack_ptr = av->av_buf_head; + avr->avr_ack_ackno = av->av_buf_ackno; + avr->avr_ack_nonce = av->av_buf_nonce; + avr->avr_sent_len = av->av_vec_len;dccp_ackvec_insert_avr (av, avr);dccp_pr_debug ("%s ACK Vector 0, len=%d, ack_seqno=%llu, " "ack_ackno=%llu\n" , -dccp_role (sk), avr->dccpavr_sent_len, - (unsigned long long )avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno, - (unsigned long long )avr->dccpavr_ack_ackno); +dccp_role (sk), avr->avr_sent_len, + (unsigned long long )avr->avr_ack_seqno, + (unsigned long long )avr->avr_ack_ackno);return 0 ; }@@ -155,12 +153,12 @@ struct dccp_ackvec *dccp_ackvec_alloc(const gfp_t priority)struct dccp_ackvec *av =kmem_cache_alloc (dccp_ackvec_slab, priority);if (av !=NULL ) { - av->dccpav_buf_head =DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN -1 ; - av->dccpav_buf_ackno =UINT48_MAX +1 ; - av->dccpav_buf_nonce = av->dccpav_buf_nonce =0 ; - av->dccpav_time =ktime_set (0 ,0 ); - av->dccpav_vec_len =0 ; -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&av->dccpav_records); + av->av_buf_head =DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN -1 ; + av->av_buf_ackno =UINT48_MAX +1 ; + av->av_buf_nonce =0 ; + av->av_time =ktime_set (0 ,0 ); + av->av_vec_len =0 ; +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&av->av_records); }return av;@@ -171,12 +169,11 @@ void dccp_ackvec_free(struct dccp_ackvec *av)if (unlikely (av =NULL ))return ; -if (!list_empty (&av->dccpav_records)) { +if (!list_empty (&av->av_records)) {struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr, *next; -list_for_each_entry_safe (avr, next, &av->dccpav_records, - dccpavr_node) { -list_del_init (&avr->dccpavr_node); +list_for_each_entry_safe (avr, next, &av->av_records, avr_node) { +list_del_init (&avr->avr_node);dccp_ackvec_record_delete (avr); } }@@ -187,13 +184,13 @@ void dccp_ackvec_free(struct dccp_ackvec *av)static inline u8 dccp_ackvec_state (const struct dccp_ackvec *av,const u32 index) { -return av->dccpav_buf[index] &DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_MASK ; +return av->av_buf[index] &DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_MASK ; }static inline u8 dccp_ackvec_len (const struct dccp_ackvec *av,const u32 index) { -return av->dccpav_buf[index] &DCCP_ACKVEC_LEN_MASK ; +return av->av_buf[index] &DCCP_ACKVEC_LEN_MASK ; }/* @@ -208,29 +205,29 @@ static inline int dccp_ackvec_set_buf_head_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av,unsigned int gap;long new_head; -if (av->dccpav_vec_len + packets >DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ) +if (av->av_vec_len + packets >DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN )return -ENOBUFS ; gap = packets -1 ; - new_head = av->dccpav_buf_head - packets; + new_head = av->av_buf_head - packets;if (new_head <0 ) {if (gap >0 ) { -memset (av->dccpav_buf,DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_NOT_RECEIVED , +memset (av->av_buf,DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_NOT_RECEIVED , gap + new_head +1 ); gap = -new_head; } new_head +=DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN ; } - av->dccpav_buf_head = new_head; + av->av_buf_head = new_head;if (gap >0 ) -memset (av->dccpav_buf + av->dccpav_buf_head +1 , +memset (av->av_buf + av->av_buf_head +1 ,DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_NOT_RECEIVED , gap); - av->dccpav_buf[av->dccpav_buf_head] = state; - av->dccpav_vec_len += packets; + av->av_buf[av->av_buf_head] = state; + av->av_vec_len += packets;return 0 ; }@@ -243,7 +240,7 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,/* * Check at the right places if the buffer is full, if it is, tell the * caller to start dropping packets till the HC-Sender acks our ACK -* vectors, when we will free up space in dccpav_buf. +* vectors, when we will free up space in av_buf. * * We may well decide to do buffer compression, etc, but for now lets * just drop. @@ -263,22 +260,20 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,*/ /* See if this is the first ackno being inserted */ -if (av->dccpav_vec_len =0 ) { - av->dccpav_buf[av->dccpav_buf_head] = state; - av->dccpav_vec_len =1 ; - }else if (after48 (ackno, av->dccpav_buf_ackno)) { -const u64 delta =dccp_delta_seqno (av->dccpav_buf_ackno, - ackno); +if (av->av_vec_len =0 ) { + av->av_buf[av->av_buf_head] = state; + av->av_vec_len =1 ; + }else if (after48 (ackno, av->av_buf_ackno)) { +const u64 delta =dccp_delta_seqno (av->av_buf_ackno, ackno);/* * Look if the state of this packet is the same as the * previous ackno and if so if we can bump the head len. */ if (delta =1 && -dccp_ackvec_state (av, av->dccpav_buf_head) = state && - (dccp_ackvec_len (av, av->dccpav_buf_head) < -DCCP_ACKVEC_LEN_MASK )) - av->dccpav_buf[av->dccpav_buf_head]++; +dccp_ackvec_state (av, av->av_buf_head) = state && +dccp_ackvec_len (av, av->av_buf_head) <DCCP_ACKVEC_LEN_MASK ) + av->av_buf[av->av_buf_head]++;else if (dccp_ackvec_set_buf_head_state (av, delta, state))return -ENOBUFS ; }else {@@ -290,14 +285,14 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,* the byte corresponding to S. (Indexing structures * could reduce the complexity of this scan.) */ -u64 delta =dccp_delta_seqno (ackno, av->dccpav_buf_ackno); -u32 index = av->dccpav_buf_head; +u64 delta =dccp_delta_seqno (ackno, av->av_buf_ackno); +u32 index = av->av_buf_head; while (1) { const u8 len = dccp_ackvec_len(av, index); const u8 state = dccp_ackvec_state(av, index); /* - * valid packets not yet in dccpav_buf have a reserved + * valid packets not yet in av_buf have a reserved * entry, with a len equal to 0. */ if (state = DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_NOT_RECEIVED &&@@ -305,7 +300,7 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,reserved seat! */ dccp_pr_debug ("Found %llu reserved seat!\n" , (unsigned long long )ackno); - av->dccpav_buf[index] = state; + av->av_buf[index] = state; goto out; }/* len = 0 means one packet */ @@ -318,8 +313,8 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk, } } - av->dccpav_buf_ackno = ackno; - av->dccpav_time =ktime_get_real (); + av->av_buf_ackno = ackno; + av->av_time =ktime_get_real (); out:return 0 ;@@ -349,9 +344,9 @@ void dccp_ackvector_print(const u64 ackno, const unsigned char *vector, int len)void dccp_ackvec_print (const struct dccp_ackvec *av) { -dccp_ackvector_print (av->dccpav_buf_ackno, - av->dccpav_buf + av->dccpav_buf_head, - av->dccpav_vec_len); +dccp_ackvector_print (av->av_buf_ackno, + av->av_buf + av->av_buf_head, + av->av_vec_len); }#endif @@ -361,17 +356,15 @@ static void dccp_ackvec_throw_record(struct dccp_ackvec *av,struct dccp_ackvec_record *next;/* sort out vector length */ -if (av->dccpav_buf_head <= avr->dccpavr_ack_ptr) - av->dccpav_vec_len = avr->dccpavr_ack_ptr - av->dccpav_buf_head; +if (av->av_buf_head <= avr->avr_ack_ptr) + av->av_vec_len = avr->avr_ack_ptr - av->av_buf_head;else - av->dccpav_vec_len =DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN -1 - - av->dccpav_buf_head - + avr->dccpavr_ack_ptr; + av->av_vec_len =DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN -1 - + av->av_buf_head + avr->avr_ack_ptr;/* free records */ -list_for_each_entry_safe_from (avr, next, &av->dccpav_records, - dccpavr_node) { -list_del_init (&avr->dccpavr_node); +list_for_each_entry_safe_from (avr, next, &av->av_records, avr_node) { +list_del_init (&avr->avr_node);dccp_ackvec_record_delete (avr); } }@@ -386,16 +379,16 @@ void dccp_ackvec_check_rcv_ackno(struct dccp_ackvec *av, struct sock *sk,* windows. We will be receiving ACKs for stuff we sent a while back * -sorbo. */ -list_for_each_entry_reverse (avr, &av->dccpav_records, dccpavr_node) { -if (ackno = avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno) { +list_for_each_entry_reverse (avr, &av->av_records, avr_node) { +if (ackno = avr->avr_ack_seqno) {dccp_pr_debug ("%s ACK packet 0, len=%d, ack_seqno=%llu, " "ack_ackno=%llu, ACKED!\n" ,dccp_role (sk),1 , - (unsigned long long )avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno, - (unsigned long long )avr->dccpavr_ack_ackno); + (unsigned long long )avr->avr_ack_seqno, + (unsigned long long )avr->avr_ack_ackno);dccp_ackvec_throw_record (av, avr);break ; - }else if (avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno > ackno) + }else if (avr->avr_ack_seqno > ackno)break ;/* old news */ } }@@ -409,7 +402,7 @@ static void dccp_ackvec_check_rcv_ackvector(struct dccp_ackvec *av,struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr;/* Check if we actually sent an ACK vector */ -if (list_empty (&av->dccpav_records)) +if (list_empty (&av->av_records))return ; i = len;@@ -418,8 +411,7 @@ static void dccp_ackvec_check_rcv_ackvector(struct dccp_ackvec *av,* I think it might be more efficient to work backwards. See comment on * rcv_ackno. -sorbo. */ - avr = list_entry(av->dccpav_records.next, struct dccp_ackvec_record, - dccpavr_node); + avr = list_entry(av->av_records.next, struct dccp_ackvec_record, avr_node);while (i--) {const u8 rl = *vector &DCCP_ACKVEC_LEN_MASK ;u64 ackno_end_rl;@@ -430,15 +422,14 @@ static void dccp_ackvec_check_rcv_ackvector(struct dccp_ackvec *av,* If our AVR sequence number is greater than the ack, go * forward in the AVR list until it is not so. */ -list_for_each_entry_from (avr, &av->dccpav_records, - dccpavr_node) { -if (!after48 (avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno, *ackno)) +list_for_each_entry_from (avr, &av->av_records, avr_node) { +if (!after48 (avr->avr_ack_seqno, *ackno)) goto found; } -/* End of the dccpav_records list, not found, exit */ +/* End of the av_records list, not found, exit */ break ; found: -if (between48 (avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno, ackno_end_rl, *ackno)) { +if (between48 (avr->avr_ack_seqno, ackno_end_rl, *ackno)) {const u8 state = *vector &DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_MASK ;if (state !=DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_NOT_RECEIVED ) { dccp_pr_debug("%s ACK vector 0, len=%d, "@@ -446,9 +437,9 @@ found:"ACKED!\n" ,dccp_role (sk), len, (unsigned long long ) - avr->dccpavr_ack_seqno, + avr->avr_ack_seqno, (unsigned long long ) - avr->dccpavr_ack_ackno); + avr->avr_ack_ackno);dccp_ackvec_throw_record (av, avr);break ; }
| I have no problems with this one.
Thanks, I will put it into the test tree. Ack Vector patches should be ready some time next week, there is some documentation and test programs -- about end of this week.