Skip to contentSkip to conversation

2.6.24-rc2-mm1 - Build Fail - fs/bfs/inode.c

PATCH In review Kamalesh Babulal 3 participants 3 messages Nov 14, 2007

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 - Build Fail - fs/bfs/inode.c

Hi Andrew,

The kernel build fails, with following error

fs/bfs/inode.c: In function ‘bfs_iget’:
fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘ino’ redeclared as different kind of symbol fs/bfs/inode.c:35: error: previous definition of ‘ino’ was here fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘inode’ undeclared (first use in this function) fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onlyonce fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [fs/bfs/inode.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/bfs] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2

--

fs/bfs/~inode.c renamed from fs/bfs/inode.c +0 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc
 
 struct inode *bfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
 {
-	unsigned long ino = inode->i_ino;
 	struct bfs_inode *di;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
Signature · 4 lines
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
#1 lore raw
Quoted 20 lines · On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:30:54 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal…

Hi Andrew,

The kernel build fails, with following error

fs/bfs/inode.c: In function ‘bfs_iget’:
fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘ino’ redeclared as different kind of symbol fs/bfs/inode.c:35: error: previous definition of ‘ino’ was here fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘inode’ undeclared (first use in this function) fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onlyonce fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [fs/bfs/inode.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/bfs] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2

--

fs/bfs/~inode.c void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc · line 39

Quoted 7 lines
fs/bfs/~inode.c renamed from fs/bfs/inode.c +0 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc
 
 struct inode *bfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
 {
-	unsigned long ino = inode->i_ino;
 	struct bfs_inode *di;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	struct buffer_head *bh;

bah. That's what happens when I apply patches and fix rejects after doing all my compile-coverage testing.

Thanks. I put your two fixes into the hot-fixes/ directory.

#2 lore raw

Andrew Morton пишет:

Quoted 33 lines · On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:30:54 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal…
Quoted 21 lines

Hi Andrew,

The kernel build fails, with following error

fs/bfs/inode.c: In function ‘bfs_iget’:
fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘ino’ redeclared as different kind of symbol fs/bfs/inode.c:35: error: previous definition of ‘ino’ was here fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘inode’ undeclared (first use in this function) fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onlyonce fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [fs/bfs/inode.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/bfs] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2

--

fs/bfs/~inode.c void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc · line 39

Quoted 7 lines
fs/bfs/~inode.c renamed from fs/bfs/inode.c +0 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc
 
 struct inode *bfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
 {
-	unsigned long ino = inode->i_ino;
 	struct bfs_inode *di;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	struct buffer_head *bh;

bah. That's what happens when I apply patches and fix rejects after doing all my compile-coverage testing.

Quoted 1 line

Thanks. I put your two fixes into the hot-fixes/ directory.

Andrew, I tested the BFS driver using the 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 kernel and I can confirm that the bugs I reported earlier are gone now.

Frankly, I was not expecting that my fixes would be applied on top of the "stop using iget() and read_inode()" patches, that is why I prepared my patch against the Linus tree. Thank you for your work in merging the modifications.

Dmitri

Quoted 6 lines

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/