DM9000 updates for 2.6.25
Subsystems (2)
cover DM9000 updates for 2.6.25
This is my current proposed patch series to the DM9000 driver for both general cleanups, support for ethtool and to make the code better.
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 1/22 NET: DM9000 use dev_xxx() instead of printk for output.
Move to using dev_dbg() and friends for the output of information to the user.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +28 -28
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ typedef struct board_info {void (*outblk)(void __iomem *port,void *data,int length);void (*dumpblk)(void __iomem *port,int length); +struct device *dev;/* parent device */ +struct resource *addr_res;/* resources found */ struct resource *data_res;struct resource *addr_req;/* resources requested */
@@ -187,7 +189,8 @@ static void program_eeprom(board_info_tstatic void dm9000_reset (board_info_t * db) { -PRINTK1 ("dm9000x: resetting\n" ); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"resetting device\n" ); +/* RESET device */ writeb (DM9000_NCR , db->io_addr);udelay (200 );
@@ -303,14 +306,10 @@ static void dm9000_set_io(struct board_i db->inblk = dm9000_inblk_8bit;break ; -case 2 : - db->dumpblk = dm9000_dumpblk_16bit; - db->outblk = dm9000_outblk_16bit; - db->inblk = dm9000_inblk_16bit; -break ;case 3 : - printk(KERN_ERR PFX ": 3 byte IO, falling back to 16bit\n"); +dev_dbg (db->dev,": 3 byte IO, falling back to 16bit\n" ); +case 2 : db->dumpblk = dm9000_dumpblk_16bit; db->outblk = dm9000_outblk_16bit; db->inblk = dm9000_inblk_16bit;
@@ -413,19 +412,21 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde/* Init network device */ ndev =alloc_etherdev (sizeof (struct board_info ));if (!ndev) { -printk ("%s: could not allocate device.\n" ,CARDNAME ); +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"could not allocate device.\n" );return -ENOMEM ; }SET_MODULE_OWNER (ndev);SET_NETDEV_DEV (ndev, &pdev->dev); -PRINTK2 ("dm9000_probe()" ); +dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"probing device\n" );/* setup board info structure */ db = (struct board_info *) ndev->priv;memset (db,0 ,sizeof (*db)); + db->dev = &pdev->dev; +spin_lock_init (&db->lock);if (pdev->num_resources <2 ) {
@@ -454,7 +455,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdeif (db->addr_res ==NULL || db->data_res ==NULL || db->irq_res ==NULL ) { - printk(KERN_ERR PFX "insufficient resources\n"); +dev_err (db->dev,"insufficient resources\n" ); ret = -ENOENT ; goto out; }
@@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde pdev->name);if (db->addr_req ==NULL ) { - printk(KERN_ERR PFX "cannot claim address reg area\n"); +dev_err (db->dev,"cannot claim address reg area\n" ); ret = -EIO ; goto out; }
@@ -472,7 +473,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde db->io_addr =ioremap (db->addr_res->start, i);if (db->io_addr ==NULL ) { -printk (KERN_ERR "failed to ioremap address reg\n" ); +dev_err (db->dev,"failed to ioremap address reg\n" ); ret = -EINVAL ; goto out; }
@@ -482,7 +483,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde pdev->name);if (db->data_req ==NULL ) { - printk(KERN_ERR PFX "cannot claim data reg area\n"); +dev_err (db->dev,"cannot claim data reg area\n" ); ret = -EIO ; goto out; }
@@ -490,7 +491,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde db->io_data =ioremap (db->data_res->start, iosize);if (db->io_data ==NULL ) { -printk (KERN_ERR "failed to ioremap data reg\n" ); +dev_err (db->dev,"failed to ioremap data reg\n" ); ret = -EINVAL ; goto out; }
@@ -544,11 +545,11 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdeif (id_val ==DM9000_ID )break ; -printk ("%s: read wrong id 0x%08x\n" ,CARDNAME , id_val); +dev_err (db->dev,"read wrong id 0x%08x\n" , id_val); }if (id_val !=DM9000_ID ) { -printk ("%s: wrong id: 0x%08x\n" ,CARDNAME , id_val); +dev_err (db->dev,"wrong id: 0x%08x\n" , id_val); goto release; }
@@ -596,8 +597,8 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde }if (!is_valid_ether_addr (ndev->dev_addr)) -printk ("%s: Invalid ethernet MAC address. Please " -"set using ifconfig\n" , ndev->name); +dev_warn (db->dev,"%s: Invalid ethernet MAC address. Please " +"set using ifconfig\n" , ndev->name);platform_set_drvdata (pdev, ndev); ret =register_netdev (ndev);
@@ -613,7 +614,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde release: out: -printk ("%s: not found (%d).\n" ,CARDNAME , ret); +dev_err (db->dev,"not found (%d).\n" , ret);dm9000_release_board (pdev, db);free_netdev (ndev);
@@ -630,7 +631,7 @@ dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev) {board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv; -PRINTK2 ("entering dm9000_open\n" ); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"entering %s\n" , __func__);if (request_irq (dev->irq, &dm9000_interrupt,DM9000_IRQ_FLAGS , dev->name, dev))return -EAGAIN ;
@@ -916,7 +917,7 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev)/* Status check: this byte must be 0 or 1 */ if (rxbyte >DM9000_PKT_RDY ) { -printk ("status check failed: %d\n" , rxbyte); +dev_warn (db->dev,"status check fail: %d\n" , rxbyte);iow (db,DM9000_RCR ,0x00 );/* Stop Device */ iow (db,DM9000_ISR ,IMR_PAR );/* Stop INT request */ return ;
@@ -936,25 +937,25 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev)/* Packet Status check */ if (RxLen <0x40 ) { GoodPacket = false; -PRINTK1 ("Bad Packet received (runt)\n" ); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"Bad Packet received (runt)\n" ); }if (RxLen >DM9000_PKT_MAX ) { -PRINTK1 ("RST: RX Len:%x\n" , RxLen); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"RST: RX Len:%x\n" , RxLen); }if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0xbf ) { GoodPacket = false;if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0x01 ) { -PRINTK1 ("fifo error\n" ); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"fifo error\n" ); db->stats.rx_fifo_errors++; }if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0x02 ) { -PRINTK1 ("crc error\n" ); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"crc error\n" ); db->stats.rx_crc_errors++; }if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0x80 ) { -PRINTK1 ("length error\n" ); +dev_dbg (db->dev,"length error\n" ); db->stats.rx_length_errors++; } }
@@ -1203,8 +1204,7 @@ dm9000_drv_remove(struct platform_devicedm9000_release_board (pdev, (board_info_t *) ndev->priv);free_netdev (ndev);/* free device structure */ -PRINTK1 ("clean_module() exit\n" ); - +dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"released and freed device\n" );return 0 ; }
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 01/22] NET: DM9000 use dev_xxx() instead of printk for output.
ACK
PATCH 2/22 NET: DM9000 update debugging macros to use debug level
In reply to Ben DooksChange the debug macros to use the compiler to elide any unnecessary debug level, and to allow device configurable debug control.
drivers/net/Kconfig +8 -0
@@ -940,6 +940,14 @@ config DM9000 <file:Documentation/networking/net-modules.txt>. The module will be called dm9000. +config DM9000_DEBUGLEVEL + int "DM9000 maximum debug level" + depends on DM9000 + default 4 + help + The maximum level of debugging code compiled into the DM9000 + driver. + config SMC911X tristate "SMSC LAN911[5678] support" select CRC32
drivers/net/dm9000.c +19 -35
113 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 02/22] NET: DM9000 update debugging macros to use debug level
you really should consider adding msg_enable support (grep for that in other net drivers, and for netif_msg in netdevice.h)
PATCH 3/22 NET: DM9000: Pass IRQ flags via platform data
In reply to Ben DooksUse the platform data to pass modifications to the flags passed to request_irq() to alter the behaviour of the IRQ.
This can be used to specify IRQ type for the platform the DM9000 is connected to.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +10 -5
@@ -89,9 +89,6 @@#define writesb outsb#define writesw outsw#define writesl outsl -#define DM9000_IRQ_FLAGS (IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH) -#else -#define DM9000_IRQ_FLAGS IRQF_SHARED#endif /*
@@ -124,6 +121,8 @@ typedef struct board_info {struct device *dev;/* parent device */ +struct dm9000_plat_data *platdata; +struct resource *addr_res;/* resources found */ struct resource *data_res;struct resource *addr_req;/* resources requested */
@@ -496,9 +495,11 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde/* check to see if anything is being over-ridden */ if (pdata !=NULL ) { + db->platdata = pdata; +/* check to see if the driver wants to over-ride the * default IO width */ - +if (pdata->flags &DM9000_PLATF_8BITONLY )dm9000_set_io (db,1 );
@@ -619,10 +620,14 @@ static int dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev) {board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv; +unsigned long irqflags =IRQF_SHARED ;dev_dbg (db->dev,"entering %s\n" , __func__); -if (request_irq (dev->irq, &dm9000_interrupt,DM9000_IRQ_FLAGS , dev->name, dev)) +if (db->platdata) + irqflags |= db->platdata->irqflags; + +if (request_irq (dev->irq, &dm9000_interrupt, irqflags, dev->name, dev))return -EAGAIN ;/* Initialize DM9000 board */
include/linux/dm9000.h +1 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@struct dm9000_plat_data {unsigned int flags; +unsigned long irqflags;/* to pass to request_irq() */ /* allow replacement IO routines */
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 03/22] NET: DM9000: Pass IRQ flags via platform data
ACK
PATCH 4/22 NET: DM9000: Add initial ethtool support
In reply to Ben DooksAdd support for ethtool operations for the DM9000.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +68 -1
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@#include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/crc32.h> #include <linux/mii.h> +#include <linux/ethtool.h> #include <linux/dm9000.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -79,6 +80,7 @@#define CARDNAME "dm9000"#define PFX CARDNAME ": " +#define DRV_VERSION "1.30"#define DM9000_TIMER_WUT jiffies+(HZ*2)/* timer wakeup time : 2 second */
@@ -147,6 +149,11 @@ typedef struct board_info { } \ }while (0 ) +static inline board_info_t *to_dm9000_board(struct net_device *dev) +{ +return dev->priv; +} +/* function declaration ------------------------------------- */ static int dm9000_probe (struct platform_device *);static int dm9000_open (struct net_device *);
@@ -348,6 +355,64 @@ static void dm9000_poll_controller(struc }#endif +/* ethtool ops */ + +static void dm9000_get_drvinfo (struct net_device *dev, +struct ethtool_drvinfo *info) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); + +strcpy (info->driver,CARDNAME ); +strcpy (info->version,DRV_VERSION ); +strcpy (info->bus_info,to_platform_device (dm->dev)->name); +} + +static int dm9000_get_settings (struct net_device *dev,struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); +mii_ethtool_gset (&dm->mii, cmd); +spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int dm9000_set_settings (struct net_device *dev,struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); +unsigned long flags; +int rc; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); + rc =mii_ethtool_sset (&dm->mii, cmd); +spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); + +return rc; +} + +static int dm9000_nway_reset (struct net_device *dev) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); +return mii_nway_restart (&dm->mii); +} + +static u32 dm9000_get_link (struct net_device *dev) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); +return mii_link_ok (&dm->mii); +} + +static const struct ethtool_ops dm9000_ethtool_ops = { + .get_drvinfo = dm9000_get_drvinfo, + .get_settings = dm9000_get_settings, + .set_settings = dm9000_set_settings, + .nway_reset = dm9000_nway_reset, + .get_link = dm9000_get_link, +}; + +/* dm9000_release_board * * release a board, and any mapped resources
@@ -555,6 +620,8 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde ndev->stop = &dm9000_stop; ndev->get_stats = &dm9000_get_stats; ndev->set_multicast_list = &dm9000_hash_table; + ndev->ethtool_ops = &dm9000_ethtool_ops; +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER ndev->poll_controller = &dm9000_poll_controller;#endif
@@ -1211,7 +1278,7 @@ static struct platform_driver dm9000_dristatic int __init dm9000_init (void ) { -printk (KERN_INFO "%s Ethernet Driver\n" ,CARDNAME ); +printk (KERN_INFO "%s Ethernet Driver, V%s\n" ,CARDNAME ,DRV_VERSION );return platform_driver_register (&dm9000_driver);/* search board and register */ }
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 04/22] NET: DM9000: Add initial ethtool support
if ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO bus info is not PCI, you must add a prefix a la 3c59x.c or eepro.c
PATCH 5/22 NET: DM9000: Do not sleep with spinlock and IRQs held
In reply to Ben DooksThe phy read and write routines call udelay() with the board lock held, and with the posibility of IRQs being disabled. Since these delays can be up to 500usec, and are only required as we have to save the chip's address register.
To improve the behaviour, hold the lock whilst we are writing and then restore the state before the delay and then repeat the process once the delay has happened.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +16 -1
@@ -1171,7 +1171,15 @@ dm9000_phy_read(struct net_device *dev,iow (db,DM9000_EPAR ,DM9000_PHY | reg);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0xc );/* Issue phyxcer read command */ + +writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); +udelay (100 );/* Wait read complete */ + +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags); + reg_save =readb (db->io_addr); +iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0x0 );/* Clear phyxcer read command */ /* The read data keeps on REG_0D & REG_0E */
@@ -1179,7 +1187,6 @@ dm9000_phy_read(struct net_device *dev,/* restore the previous address */ writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags);return ret;
@@ -1208,7 +1215,15 @@ dm9000_phy_write(struct net_device *dev,iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , ((value >>8 ) &0xff ));iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0xa );/* Issue phyxcer write command */ + +writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); +udelay (500 );/* Wait write complete */ + +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags); + reg_save =readb (db->io_addr); +iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0x0 );/* Clear phyxcer write command */ /* restore the previous address */
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 05/22] NET: DM9000: Do not sleep with spinlock and IRQs held
ACK
PATCH 6/22 NET: DM9000: Use kthread to probe MII status when device open
In reply to Ben DooksWhen the device is open, we have to probe the PHY's MII status periodically as there is no status change interrupt. As the phy code is going to change to using calls which might sleep we move to using a kthread instead of a timer.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +46 -24
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@#include <linux/ethtool.h> #include <linux/dm9000.h> #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> +#include <linux/freezer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <asm/delay.h>
@@ -82,8 +84,6 @@#define PFX CARDNAME ": "#define DRV_VERSION "1.30" -#define DM9000_TIMER_WUT jiffies+(HZ*2)/* timer wakeup time : 2 second */ -#ifdef CONFIG_BLACKFIN #define readsb insb#define readsw insw
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ typedef struct board_info {struct resource *data_req;struct resource *irq_res; -struct timer_list timer; +struct task_struct *thread;struct net_device_stats stats;unsigned char srom[128 ];spinlock_t lock;
@@ -159,9 +159,8 @@ static int dm9000_probe(struct platform_static int dm9000_open (struct net_device *);static int dm9000_start_xmit (struct sk_buff *,struct net_device *);static int dm9000_stop (struct net_device *); +static int dm9000_mii_thread (void *data); - -static void dm9000_timer (unsigned long );static void dm9000_init_dm9000 (struct net_device *);static struct net_device_stats *dm9000_get_stats (struct net_device *);
@@ -679,6 +678,27 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdereturn ret; } +static void dm9000_start_thread (struct net_device *dev) +{ +board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv; + +/* Create a thread to keep track of the state of the phy +* as we do not get an interrupt when the PHY state changes. +* +* Note, we do not abort the open if we fail to create the +* thread, as this is mainly to ensure the user is kept up to +* date with the device's state. PHY accesses will still work +* via the MII read and write methods. +*/ + + db->thread =kthread_create (dm9000_mii_thread, db, dev->name); +if (IS_ERR (db->thread)) { +dev_err (db->dev,"failed to create MII thread\n" ); + db->thread =NULL ; + }else +wake_up_process (db->thread); +} +/* * Open the interface. * The interface is opened whenever "ifconfig" actives it.
@@ -704,12 +724,7 @@ dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev)/* Init driver variable */ db->dbug_cnt =0 ; -/* set and active a timer process */ -init_timer (&db->timer); - db->timer.expires =DM9000_TIMER_WUT ; - db->timer.data = (unsigned long ) dev; - db->timer.function = &dm9000_timer; -add_timer (&db->timer); +dm9000_start_thread (dev);mii_check_media (&db->mii,netif_msg_link (db),1 );netif_start_queue (dev);
@@ -833,7 +848,7 @@ dm9000_stop(struct net_device *ndev)dm9000_dbg (db,1 ,"entering %s\n" , __func__);/* deleted timer */ -del_timer (&db->timer); +kthread_stop (db->thread);netif_stop_queue (ndev);netif_carrier_off (ndev);
@@ -925,24 +940,31 @@ dm9000_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)return &db->stats; } +#define DM9000_MII_POLLFREQ (2000) -/* -* A periodic timer routine -* Dynamic media sense, allocated Rx buffer... -*/ -static void -dm9000_timer (unsigned long data) +static int +dm9000_mii_thread (void *pw) { -struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) data; -board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv; +board_info_t *db = pw; +unsigned long next = jiffies +msecs_to_jiffies (DM9000_MII_POLLFREQ );dm9000_dbg (db,3 ,"entering %s\n" , __func__); -mii_check_media (&db->mii,netif_msg_link (db),0 ); +while (!kthread_should_stop ()) { +set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ); +try_to_freeze (); + +if (time_after (jiffies, next)) { +mii_check_media (&db->mii,netif_msg_link (db),0 ); + next = jiffies; + next +=msecs_to_jiffies (DM9000_MII_POLLFREQ ); + } + +msleep_interruptible (DM9000_MII_POLLFREQ ); + } -/* Set timer again */ - db->timer.expires =DM9000_TIMER_WUT ; -add_timer (&db->timer); +dm9000_dbg (db,3 ,"leaving %s\n" , __func__); +return 0 ; }struct dm9000_rxhdr {
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 06/22] NET: DM9000: Use kthread to probe MII status when device open
Quoted 25 lines
drivers/net/dm9000.c +21
-0+static void dm9000_start_thread (struct net_device *dev) +{ +board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv; + +/* Create a thread to keep track of the state of the phy +* as we do not get an interrupt when the PHY state changes. +* +* Note, we do not abort the open if we fail to create the +* thread, as this is mainly to ensure the user is kept up to +* date with the device's state. PHY accesses will still work +* via the MII read and write methods. +*/ + + db->thread =kthread_create (dm9000_mii_thread, db, dev->name); +if (IS_ERR (db->thread)) { +dev_err (db->dev,"failed to create MII thread\n" ); + db->thread =NULL ; + }else +wake_up_process (db->thread); +} +/* * Open the interface. * The interface is opened whenever "ifconfig" actives it.
drivers/net/dm9000.c dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev) · line 727
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/dm9000.c +1
-6@@ -704,12 +724,7 @@ dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev)/* Init driver variable */ db->dbug_cnt =0 ; -/* set and active a timer process */ -init_timer (&db->timer); - db->timer.expires =DM9000_TIMER_WUT ; - db->timer.data = (unsigned long ) dev; - db->timer.function = &dm9000_timer; -add_timer (&db->timer); +dm9000_start_thread (dev);
Please don't just ignore the error. Just inline the content of dm9000_start_thread into the caller and use proper goto-based unwinding.
Re: [patch 06/22] NET: DM9000: Use kthread to probe MII status when device open
Quoted 28 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/net/dm9000.c +21
-0+static void dm9000_start_thread (struct net_device *dev) +{ +board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv; + +/* Create a thread to keep track of the state of the phy +* as we do not get an interrupt when the PHY state changes. +* +* Note, we do not abort the open if we fail to create the +* thread, as this is mainly to ensure the user is kept up to +* date with the device's state. PHY accesses will still work +* via the MII read and write methods. +*/ + + db->thread =kthread_create (dm9000_mii_thread, db, dev->name); +if (IS_ERR (db->thread)) { +dev_err (db->dev,"failed to create MII thread\n" ); + db->thread =NULL ; + }else +wake_up_process (db->thread); +} +/* * Open the interface. * The interface is opened whenever "ifconfig" actives it. @@ -704,12 +724,7 @@ dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev)/* Init driver variable */ db->dbug_cnt =0 ;
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/dm9000.c dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev) · line 727
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/dm9000.c +1
-6-/* set and active a timer process */ -init_timer (&db->timer); - db->timer.expires =DM9000_TIMER_WUT ; - db->timer.data = (unsigned long ) dev; - db->timer.function = &dm9000_timer; -add_timer (&db->timer); +dm9000_start_thread (dev);Please don't just ignore the error. Just inline the content of
dm9000_start_threadinto the caller and use proper goto-based unwinding.
The error is not important, I would be happy with adding an error print in there, but not having the MII system print an message if the link status changes is not an driver threatening error.
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 06/22] NET: DM9000: Use kthread to probe MII status when device open
In reply to Ben Dooksseems like a delayed workqueue would be most appropriate for this.
Re: [patch 06/22] NET: DM9000: Use kthread to probe MII status when device open
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Garzik
seems like a delayed workqueue would be most appropriate for this.
I like the fact that the use of kthread shows the user how much cpu time is being used by the execution of monitoring the phy. How badly do people object to using a kthread?
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 7/22 NET: DM9000: Use msleep() instead of udelay()
In reply to Ben DooksWe can use sleeping functions when reading and writing the PHY registers, so let us sleep instead of busy waiting for the PHY.
Note, this also fixes a bug reading the PHY where only 100uS was being used instead of 150uS
drivers/net/dm9000.c +21 -2
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ typedef struct board_info {u8 io_mode;/* 0:word, 2:byte */ u8 phy_addr;unsigned int flags; + unsigned int in_suspend :1;int debug_level;
@@ -1174,6 +1175,18 @@ dm9000_hash_table(struct net_device *dev/* +* Sleep, either by using msleep() or if we are suspending, then +* use mdelay() to sleep. +*/ +static void dm9000_msleep (board_info_t *db,unsigned int ms) +{ +if (db->in_suspend) +mdelay (ms); +else +msleep (ms); +} + +/* * Read a word from phyxcer */ static int
@@ -1197,7 +1210,7 @@ dm9000_phy_read(struct net_device *dev,writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); -udelay (100 );/* Wait read complete */ +dm9000_msleep (db,1 );/* Wait read complete */ spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags); reg_save =readb (db->io_addr);
@@ -1241,7 +1254,7 @@ dm9000_phy_write(struct net_device *dev,writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); -udelay (500 );/* Wait write complete */ +dm9000_msleep (db,1 );/* Wait write complete */ spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags); reg_save =readb (db->io_addr);
@@ -1258,8 +1271,12 @@ static int dm9000_drv_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state) {struct net_device *ndev =platform_get_drvdata (dev); +board_info_t *db;if (ndev) { + db = (board_info_t *) ndev->priv; + db->in_suspend =1 ; +if (netif_running (ndev)) {netif_device_detach (ndev);dm9000_shutdown (ndev);
@@ -1282,6 +1299,8 @@ dm9000_drv_resume(struct platform_devicenetif_device_attach (ndev); } + + db->in_suspend =0 ; }return 0 ; }
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 07/22] NET: DM9000: Use msleep() instead of udelay()
are you sure you cannot sleep during suspend?
Re: [patch 07/22] NET: DM9000: Use msleep() instead of udelay()
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Garzik
are you sure you cannot sleep during suspend?
Yes. This is not the first driver that has had this problem, see the sm501 as another example.
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 8/22 NET: DM9000: Remove barely used SROM array read.
In reply to Ben DooksThe srom array in the board data is only being used in the device probe routines. The probe also only uses the first 6 bytes of an array we spend 512ms reading 128 bytes from. Change to reading the MAC area directly to the MAC address structure.
As a side product, we rename the read_srom_word to dm9000_read_eeprom to bring it into line with the rest of the driver. No change is made to the delay in this function, which will be dealt with in a later patch.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +11 -13
@@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ typedef struct board_info {struct task_struct *thread;struct net_device_stats stats; -unsigned char srom[128 ];spinlock_t lock;struct mii_if_info mii;
@@ -171,7 +170,8 @@ static irqreturn_t dm9000_interrupt(int,static int dm9000_phy_read (struct net_device *dev,int phyaddr_unsused,int reg);static void dm9000_phy_write (struct net_device *dev,int phyaddr_unused,int reg,int value); -static u16 read_srom_word (board_info_t *,int ); + +static void dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *,int addr,unsigned char *to);static void dm9000_rx (struct net_device *);static void dm9000_hash_table (struct net_device *);
@@ -638,13 +638,9 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde db->mii.mdio_read = dm9000_phy_read; db->mii.mdio_write = dm9000_phy_write; -/* Read SROM content */ -for (i =0 ; i <64 ; i++) - ((u16 *) db->srom)[i] =read_srom_word (db, i); - -/* Set Node Address */ -for (i =0 ; i <6 ; i++) - ndev->dev_addr[i] = db->srom[i]; +/* try reading the node address from the attached EEPROM */ +for (i =0 ; i <6 ; i +=2 ) +dm9000_read_eeprom (db, i /2 , ndev->dev_addr+i);if (!is_valid_ether_addr (ndev->dev_addr)) {/* try reading from mac */
@@ -1064,17 +1060,19 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev) }/* -* Read a word data from SROM +* Read a word data from EEPROM */ -static u16 -read_srom_word (board_info_t * db,int offset) +static void +dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t * db,int offset,unsigned char *to) {iow (db,DM9000_EPAR , offset);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_ERPRR );mdelay (8 );/* according to the datasheet 200us should be enough, but it doesn't work */ iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0x0 ); -return (ior (db,DM9000_EPDRL ) + (ior (db,DM9000_EPDRH ) <<8 )); + + to[0 ] =ior (db,DM9000_EPDRL ); + to[1 ] =ior (db,DM9000_EPDRH ); }#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 9/22 NET: DM9000: Add mutex to protect access
In reply to Ben DooksAdd a mutex to serialise access to the chip functions from entries such as the ethtool and the MII code. This should reduce the amount of time the spinlock is held to protect the address register.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +39 -14
@@ -100,6 +100,24 @@ static int watchdog = 5000;module_param (watchdog, int,0400 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (watchdog,"transmit timeout in milliseconds" ); +/* DM9000 register address locking. +* +* The DM9000 uses an address register to control where data written +* to the data register goes. This means that the address register +* must be preserved over interrupts or similar calls. +* +* During interrupt and other critical calls, a spinlock is used to +* protect the system, but the calls themselves save the address +* in the address register in case they are interrupting another +* access to the device. +* +* For general accesses a lock is provided so that calls which are +* allowed to sleep are serialised so that the address register does +* not need to be saved. This lock also serves to serialise access +* to the EEPROM and PHY access registers which are shared between +* these two devices. +*/ +/* Structure/enum declaration ------------------------------- */ typedef struct board_info {
@@ -132,6 +150,8 @@ typedef struct board_info {struct resource *data_req;struct resource *irq_res; +struct mutex addr_lock;/* phy and eeprom access lock */ +struct task_struct *thread;struct net_device_stats stats;spinlock_t lock;
@@ -370,26 +390,16 @@ static void dm9000_get_drvinfo(struct nestatic int dm9000_get_settings (struct net_device *dev,struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) {board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); -unsigned long flags; -spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags);mii_ethtool_gset (&dm->mii, cmd); -spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); -return 0 ; }static int dm9000_set_settings (struct net_device *dev,struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) {board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); -unsigned long flags; -int rc; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); - rc =mii_ethtool_sset (&dm->mii, cmd); -spin_lock_irqsave (&dm->lock, flags); -return rc; +return mii_ethtool_sset (&dm->mii, cmd); }static int dm9000_nway_reset (struct net_device *dev)
@@ -481,6 +491,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde db->dev = &pdev->dev;spin_lock_init (&db->lock); +mutex_init (&db->addr_lock);if (pdev->num_resources <2 ) { ret = -ENODEV ;
@@ -1063,8 +1074,10 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev)* Read a word data from EEPROM */ static void -dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t * db,int offset,unsigned char *to) +dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *db,int offset,unsigned char *to) { +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock); +iow (db,DM9000_EPAR , offset);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_ERPRR );mdelay (8 );/* according to the datasheet 200us should be enough,
@@ -1073,6 +1086,8 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t * db, in to[0 ] =ior (db,DM9000_EPDRL ); to[1 ] =ior (db,DM9000_EPDRH ); + +mutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); }#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM
@@ -1082,12 +1097,16 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t * db, instatic void write_srom_word (board_info_t * db,int offset,u16 val) { +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock); +iow (db,DM9000_EPAR , offset);iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , ((val >>8 ) &0xff ));iow (db,DM9000_EPDRL , (val &0xff ));iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_WEP |EPCR_ERPRW );mdelay (8 );/* same shit */ iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0 ); + +mutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); }/*
@@ -1195,6 +1214,8 @@ dm9000_phy_read(struct net_device *dev,unsigned int reg_save;int ret; +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock); +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags);/* Save previous register address */
@@ -1222,6 +1243,7 @@ dm9000_phy_read(struct net_device *dev,writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); +mutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock);return ret; }
@@ -1235,6 +1257,8 @@ dm9000_phy_write(struct net_device *dev,unsigned long flags;unsigned long reg_save; +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock); +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags);/* Save previous register address */
@@ -1250,7 +1274,7 @@ dm9000_phy_write(struct net_device *dev,iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0xa );/* Issue phyxcer write command */ writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags);dm9000_msleep (db,1 );/* Wait write complete */
@@ -1262,7 +1286,8 @@ dm9000_phy_write(struct net_device *dev,/* restore the previous address */ writeb (reg_save, db->io_addr); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); +mutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); } static int
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 10/22 NET: DM9000: Add ethtool support for reading and writing EEPROM
In reply to Ben DooksAdd ethtool support to access the configuration EEPROM connected to the DM9000.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +60 -6
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ static int dm9000_phy_read(struct net_destatic void dm9000_phy_write (struct net_device *dev,int phyaddr_unused,int reg,int value); -static void dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *,int addr,unsigned char *to); +static void dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *,int addr,u8 *to); +static void dm9000_write_eeprom (board_info_t *,int addr,u8 *dp);static void dm9000_rx (struct net_device *);static void dm9000_hash_table (struct net_device *);
@@ -414,12 +415,65 @@ static u32 dm9000_get_link(struct net_dereturn mii_link_ok (&dm->mii); } +#define DM_EEPROM_MAGIC (0x444D394B) + +static int dm9000_get_eeprom_len (struct net_device *dev) +{ +return 128 ; +} + +static int dm9000_get_eeprom (struct net_device *dev, +struct ethtool_eeprom *ee,u8 *data) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); +int offset = ee->offset; +int len = ee->len; +int i; + +/* EEPROM access is aligned to two bytes */ + +if ((len &1 ) !=0 || (offset &1 ) !=0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + + ee->magic =DM_EEPROM_MAGIC ; + +for (i =0 ; i < len; i +=2 ) +dm9000_read_eeprom (dm, (offset + i) /2 , data + i); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int dm9000_set_eeprom (struct net_device *dev, +struct ethtool_eeprom *ee,u8 *data) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); +int offset = ee->offset; +int len = ee->len; +int i; + +/* EEPROM access is aligned to two bytes */ + +if ((len &1 ) !=0 || (offset &1 ) !=0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + +if (ee->magic !=DM_EEPROM_MAGIC ) +return -EINVAL ; + +for (i =0 ; i < len; i +=2 ) +dm9000_write_eeprom (dm, (offset + i) /2 , data + i); + +return 0 ; +} +static const struct ethtool_ops dm9000_ethtool_ops = { .get_drvinfo = dm9000_get_drvinfo, .get_settings = dm9000_get_settings, .set_settings = dm9000_set_settings, .nway_reset = dm9000_nway_reset, .get_link = dm9000_get_link, + .get_eeprom_len = dm9000_get_eeprom_len, + .get_eeprom = dm9000_get_eeprom, + .set_eeprom = dm9000_set_eeprom, };
@@ -1074,7 +1128,7 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev)* Read a word data from EEPROM */ static void -dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *db,int offset,unsigned char *to) +dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *db,int offset,u8 *to) {mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock);
@@ -1090,18 +1144,17 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t *db, intmutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); } -#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM /* * Write a word data to SROM */ static void -write_srom_word (board_info_t * db,int offset,u16 val) +dm9000_write_eeprom (board_info_t *db,int offset,u8 *data) {mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock);iow (db,DM9000_EPAR , offset); -iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , ((val >>8 ) &0xff )); -iow (db,DM9000_EPDRL , (val &0xff )); +iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , data[1 ]); +iow (db,DM9000_EPDRL , data[0 ]);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_WEP |EPCR_ERPRW );mdelay (8 );/* same shit */ iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0 );
@@ -1109,6 +1162,7 @@ write_srom_word(board_info_t * db, int omutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); } +#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM /* * Only for development: * Here we write static data to the eeprom in case
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 11/22 NET: DM9000: Add ethtool control of msg_enable value
In reply to Ben DooksAllow the msg_enable value to be read and written by the ethtool interface.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +16 -0
@@ -388,6 +388,20 @@ static void dm9000_get_drvinfo(struct nestrcpy (info->bus_info,to_platform_device (dm->dev)->name); } +static u32 dm9000_get_msglevel (struct net_device *dev) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); + +return dm->msg_enable; +} + +static void dm9000_set_msglevel (struct net_device *dev,u32 value) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); + + dm->msg_enable = value; +} +static int dm9000_get_settings (struct net_device *dev,struct ethtool_cmd *cmd) {board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev);
@@ -469,6 +483,8 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops dm9000_e .get_drvinfo = dm9000_get_drvinfo, .get_settings = dm9000_get_settings, .set_settings = dm9000_set_settings, + .get_msglevel = dm9000_get_msglevel, + .set_msglevel = dm9000_set_msglevel, .nway_reset = dm9000_nway_reset, .get_link = dm9000_get_link, .get_eeprom_len = dm9000_get_eeprom_len,
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 12/22 NET: DM9000: Remove EEPROM initialisation code.
In reply to Ben DooksRemove the old hack to program an initial EEPROM setting into the DM9000 as we now have ethtool support for reading and writing the EEPROM.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +0 -29
@@ -196,10 +196,6 @@ static void dm9000_write_eeprom(board_instatic void dm9000_rx (struct net_device *);static void dm9000_hash_table (struct net_device *); -//#define DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM -#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM -static void program_eeprom (board_info_t * db); -#endif /* DM9000 network board routine ---------------------------- */ static void
@@ -707,9 +703,6 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde ndev->poll_controller = &dm9000_poll_controller;#endif -#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM -program_eeprom (db); -#endif db->msg_enable =NETIF_MSG_LINK ; db->mii.phy_id_mask =0x1f ; db->mii.reg_num_mask =0x1f ;
@@ -1178,28 +1171,6 @@ dm9000_write_eeprom(board_info_t *db, inmutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); } -#ifdef DM9000_PROGRAM_EEPROM -/* -* Only for development: -* Here we write static data to the eeprom in case -* we don't have valid content on a new board -*/ -static void -program_eeprom (board_info_t * db) -{ -u16 eeprom[] = {0x0c00 ,0x007f ,0x1300 ,/* MAC Address */ -0x0000 ,/* Autoload: accept nothing */ -0x0a46 ,0x9000 ,/* Vendor / Product ID */ -0x0000 ,/* pin control */ -0x0000 , - };/* Wake-up mode control */ -int i; -for (i =0 ; i <8 ; i++) -write_srom_word (db, i, eeprom[i]); -} -#endif - -/* * Calculate the CRC valude of the Rx packet * flag = 1 : return the reverse CRC (for the received packet CRC)
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 13/22 NET: DM9000: Ensure spinlock held whilst accessing EEPROM registers
In reply to Ben DooksEnsure we hold the spinlock whilst the registers and being modified even though we hold the overall lock. This should protect against an interrupt happening whilst we are using the device.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +20 -0
@@ -1139,17 +1139,29 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev)static void dm9000_read_eeprom (board_info_t *db,int offset,u8 *to) { +unsigned long flags; +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock); +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags); +iow (db,DM9000_EPAR , offset);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_ERPRR ); + +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); +mdelay (8 );/* according to the datasheet 200us should be enough, but it doesn't work */ + +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags); +iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0x0 ); to[0 ] =ior (db,DM9000_EPDRL ); to[1 ] =ior (db,DM9000_EPDRH ); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); +mutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); }
@@ -1159,14 +1171,22 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t *db, intstatic void dm9000_write_eeprom (board_info_t *db,int offset,u8 *data) { +unsigned long flags; +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock); +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags);iow (db,DM9000_EPAR , offset);iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , data[1 ]);iow (db,DM9000_EPDRL , data[0 ]);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_WEP |EPCR_ERPRW ); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); +mdelay (8 );/* same shit */ + +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0 ); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags);mutex_unlock (&db->addr_lock); }
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 14/22 NET: DM9000: Remove unnecessary changelog in header comment
In reply to Ben DooksWe have a perfectly good version control system, so we do not need to duplicate change comments in the header for this code.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +5 -40
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@/* -* dm9000.c: Version 1.2 03/18/2003 -* -* A Davicom DM9000 ISA NIC fast Ethernet driver for Linux. +* Davicom DM9000 Fast Ethernet driver for Linux. * Copyright (C) 1997 Sten Wang * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -14,44 +12,11 @@* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * -* (C)Copyright 1997-1998 DAVICOM Semiconductor,Inc. All Rights Reserved. -* -* V0.11 06/20/2001 REG_0A bit3=1, default enable BP with DA match -* 06/22/2001 Support DM9801 progrmming -* E3: R25 = ((R24 + NF) & 0x00ff) | 0xf000 -* E4: R25 = ((R24 + NF) & 0x00ff) | 0xc200 -* R17 = (R17 & 0xfff0) | NF + 3 -* E5: R25 = ((R24 + NF - 3) & 0x00ff) | 0xc200 -* R17 = (R17 & 0xfff0) | NF -* -* v1.00 modify by simon 2001.9.5 -* change for kernel 2.4.x -* -* v1.1 11/09/2001 fix force mode bug -* -* v1.2 03/18/2003 Weilun Huang <[email protected]>: -* Fixed phy reset. -* Added tx/rx 32 bit mode. -* Cleaned up for kernel merge. -* -* 03/03/2004 Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> -* Port to 2.6 kernel -* -* 24-Sep-2004 Ben Dooks <[email protected]> -* Cleanup of code to remove ifdefs -* Allowed platform device data to influence access width -* Reformatting areas of code -* -* 17-Mar-2005 Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> -* * removed 2.4 style module parameters -* * removed removed unused stat counter and fixed -* net_device_stats -* * introduced tx_timeout function -* * reworked locking +* (C) Copyright 1997-1998 DAVICOM Semiconductor,Inc. All Rights Reserved. * -* 01-Jul-2005 Ben Dooks <[email protected]> -* * fixed spinlock call without pointer -* * ensure spinlock is initialised +* Additional updates, Copyright: +* Ben Dooks <[email protected]> +* Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> */ #include <linux/module.h>
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 14/22] NET: DM9000: Remove unnecessary changelog in header comment
ACK patches 8-14
PATCH 15/22 NET: DM9000: Use netif_msg to enable debugging options
In reply to Ben DooksUse the netif_msg_*() macros to enable the debugging based on the board's msg_enable field. The output still goes via the dev_dbg() macros, so will be tagged and output as appropriate.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +22 -6
@@ -745,7 +745,8 @@ dm9000_open(struct net_device *dev)board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv;unsigned long irqflags =IRQF_SHARED ; -dev_dbg (db->dev,"entering %s\n" , __func__); +if (netif_msg_ifup (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"enabling %s\n" , dev->name);if (db->platdata) irqflags |= db->platdata->irqflags;
@@ -881,7 +882,8 @@ dm9000_stop(struct net_device *ndev) {board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) ndev->priv; -dm9000_dbg (db,1 ,"entering %s\n" , __func__); +if (netif_msg_ifdown (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"shutting down %s\n" , ndev->name);/* deleted timer */ kthread_stop (db->thread);
@@ -912,6 +914,9 @@ dm9000_tx_done(struct net_device *dev, b db->tx_pkt_cnt--; db->stats.tx_packets++; +if (netif_msg_tx_done (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"tx done, NSR %02x\n" , tx_status); +/* Queue packet check & send */ if (db->tx_pkt_cnt >0 ) {iow (db,DM9000_TXPLL , db->queue_pkt_len &0xff );
@@ -947,6 +952,9 @@ dm9000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) int_status =ior (db,DM9000_ISR );/* Got ISR */ iow (db,DM9000_ISR , int_status);/* Clear ISR status */ +if (netif_msg_intr (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"interrupt status %02x\n" , int_status); +/* Received the coming packet */ if (int_status &ISR_PRS )dm9000_rx (dev);
@@ -1048,10 +1056,15 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev) RxLen =le16_to_cpu (rxhdr.RxLen); +if (netif_msg_rx_status (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"RX: status %02x, length %04x\n" , + rxhdr.RxStatus, RxLen); +/* Packet Status check */ if (RxLen <0x40 ) { GoodPacket = false; -dev_dbg (db->dev,"Bad Packet received (runt)\n" ); +if (netif_msg_rx_err (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"RX: Bad Packet (runt)\n" ); }if (RxLen >DM9000_PKT_MAX ) {
@@ -1061,15 +1074,18 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev)if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0xbf ) { GoodPacket = false;if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0x01 ) { -dev_dbg (db->dev,"fifo error\n" ); +if (netif_msg_rx_err (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"fifo error\n" ); db->stats.rx_fifo_errors++; }if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0x02 ) { -dev_dbg (db->dev,"crc error\n" ); +if (netif_msg_rx_err (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"crc error\n" ); db->stats.rx_crc_errors++; }if (rxhdr.RxStatus &0x80 ) { -dev_dbg (db->dev,"length error\n" ); +if (netif_msg_rx_err (db)) +dev_dbg (db->dev,"length error\n" ); db->stats.rx_length_errors++; } }
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 15/22] NET: DM9000: Use netif_msg to enable debugging options
ah, you took care of my comment regarding an earlier patch.
consider that comment rescinded
PATCH 16/22 NET: DM9000: Fix delays used by EEPROM read and write
In reply to Ben DooksThe code was using a delay of 8ms, when it should have been using the EEPROM status flag from the device to indicate the EEPROM transaction had finished.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +51 -3
@@ -1114,6 +1114,50 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev) }while (rxbyte ==DM9000_PKT_RDY ); } +static unsigned int +dm9000_read_locked (board_info_t *db,int reg) +{ +unsigned long flags; +unsigned int ret; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags); + ret =ior (db, reg); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); + +return ret; +} + +static int dm9000_wait_eeprom (board_info_t *db) +{ +unsigned int status; +int timeout =8 ;/* wait max 8msec */ + +/* The DM9000 data sheets say we should be able to +* poll the ERRE bit in EPCR to wait for the EEPROM +* operation. From testing several chips, this bit +* does not seem to work. +* +* We attempt to use the bit, but fall back to the +* timeout (which is why we do not return an error +* on expiry) to say that the EEPROM operation has +* completed. +*/ + +while (1 ) { + status =dm9000_read_locked (db,DM9000_EPCR ); + +if ((status &EPCR_ERRE ) ==0 ) +break ; + +if (timeout-- <0 ) { +dev_dbg (db->dev,"timeout waiting EEPROM\n" ); +break ; + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +/* * Read a word data from EEPROM */
@@ -1131,8 +1175,10 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t *db, intspin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); -mdelay (8 );/* according to the datasheet 200us should be enough, -but it doesn't work */ +dm9000_wait_eeprom (db); + +/* delay for at-least 150uS */ +msleep (1 );spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags);
@@ -1163,7 +1209,9 @@ dm9000_write_eeprom(board_info_t *db, iniow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,EPCR_WEP |EPCR_ERPRW );spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); -mdelay (8 );/* same shit */ +dm9000_wait_eeprom (db); + +mdelay (1 );/* wait at least 150uS to clear */ spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags);iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0 );
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 17/22 NET: DM9000: Remove cal_CRC() and use ether_crc_le instead
In reply to Ben DooksRemove the cal_CRC as this is basically wrappering the ether_crc_le function, and is only being used by the multicast hash table functions.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +9 -26
@@ -1221,24 +1221,6 @@ dm9000_write_eeprom(board_info_t *db, in }/* -* Calculate the CRC valude of the Rx packet -* flag = 1 : return the reverse CRC (for the received packet CRC) -* 0 : return the normal CRC (for Hash Table index) -*/ - -static unsigned long -cal_CRC (unsigned char *Data,unsigned int Len,u8 flag) -{ - -u32 crc =ether_crc_le (Len, Data); - -if (flag) -return ~crc; - -return crc; -} - -/* * Set DM9000 multicast address */ static void
@@ -1247,15 +1229,16 @@ dm9000_hash_table(struct net_device *devboard_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) dev->priv;struct dev_mc_list *mcptr = dev->mc_list;int mc_cnt = dev->mc_count; +int i, oft;u32 hash_val; -u16 i, oft, hash_table[4 ]; +u16 hash_table[4 ];unsigned long flags;dm9000_dbg (db,1 ,"entering %s\n" , __func__); -spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock,flags); +spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags); -for (i =0 , oft =0x10 ; i <6 ; i++, oft++) +for (i =0 , oft =DM9000_PAR ; i <6 ; i++, oft++)iow (db, oft, dev->dev_addr[i]);/* Clear Hash Table */
@@ -1267,17 +1250,17 @@ dm9000_hash_table(struct net_device *dev/* the multicast address in Hash Table : 64 bits */ for (i =0 ; i < mc_cnt; i++, mcptr = mcptr->next) { - hash_val =cal_CRC ((char *) mcptr->dmi_addr,6 ,0 ) &0x3f ; + hash_val =ether_crc_le (6 , mcptr->dmi_addr) &0x3f ; hash_table[hash_val /16 ] |= (u16 )1 << (hash_val %16 ); }/* Write the hash table to MAC MD table */ -for (i =0 , oft =0x16 ; i <4 ; i++) { -iow (db, oft++, hash_table[i] &0xff ); -iow (db, oft++, (hash_table[i] >>8 ) &0xff ); +for (i =0 , oft =DM9000_MAR ; i <4 ; i++) { +iow (db, oft++, hash_table[i]); +iow (db, oft++, hash_table[i] >>8 ); } -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock,flags); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&db->lock, flags); }
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 18/22 NET: DM9000: Remove redudant use of "& 0xff"
In reply to Ben DooksThe writing of the data should implicitly truncate the data to 8bits, so do not bother with the ands in the code.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +6 -6
@@ -840,8 +840,8 @@ dm9000_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, s/* TX control: First packet immediately send, second packet queue */ if (db->tx_pkt_cnt ==1 ) {/* Set TX length to DM9000 */ -iow (db,DM9000_TXPLL , skb->len &0xff ); -iow (db,DM9000_TXPLH , (skb->len >>8 ) &0xff ); +iow (db,DM9000_TXPLL , skb->len); +iow (db,DM9000_TXPLH , skb->len >>8 );/* Issue TX polling command */ iow (db,DM9000_TCR ,TCR_TXREQ );/* Cleared after TX complete */
@@ -919,8 +919,8 @@ dm9000_tx_done(struct net_device *dev, b/* Queue packet check & send */ if (db->tx_pkt_cnt >0 ) { -iow (db,DM9000_TXPLL , db->queue_pkt_len &0xff ); -iow (db,DM9000_TXPLH , (db->queue_pkt_len >>8 ) &0xff ); +iow (db,DM9000_TXPLL , db->queue_pkt_len); +iow (db,DM9000_TXPLH , db->queue_pkt_len >>8 );iow (db,DM9000_TCR ,TCR_TXREQ ); dev->trans_start = jiffies; }
@@ -1341,8 +1341,8 @@ dm9000_phy_write(struct net_device *dev,iow (db,DM9000_EPAR ,DM9000_PHY | reg);/* Fill the written data into REG_0D & REG_0E */ -iow (db,DM9000_EPDRL , (value &0xff )); -iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , ((value >>8 ) &0xff )); +iow (db,DM9000_EPDRL , value); +iow (db,DM9000_EPDRH , value >>8 );iow (db,DM9000_EPCR ,0xa );/* Issue phyxcer write command */
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 19/22 NET: DM9000: Add platform flag for no attached EEPROM
In reply to Ben DooksAllow the platform data to specify to the DM9000 driver that there is no posibility of an attached EEPROM on the device, so default all reads to 0xff and ignore any write operations.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +15 -0
@@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static int dm9000_get_eeprom(struct net_if ((len &1 ) !=0 || (offset &1 ) !=0 )return -EINVAL ; +if (dm->flags &DM9000_PLATF_NO_EEPROM ) +return -ENOENT ; + ee->magic =DM_EEPROM_MAGIC ;for (i =0 ; i < len; i +=2 )
@@ -431,6 +434,9 @@ static int dm9000_set_eeprom(struct net_if ((len &1 ) !=0 || (offset &1 ) !=0 )return -EINVAL ; +if (dm->flags &DM9000_PLATF_NO_EEPROM ) +return -ENOENT ; +if (ee->magic !=DM_EEPROM_MAGIC )return -EINVAL ;
@@ -1166,6 +1172,12 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t *db, int {unsigned long flags; +if (db->flags &DM9000_PLATF_NO_EEPROM ) { + to[0 ] =0xff ; + to[1 ] =0xff ; +return ; + } +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock);spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags);
@@ -1200,6 +1212,9 @@ dm9000_write_eeprom(board_info_t *db, in {unsigned long flags; +if (db->flags &DM9000_PLATF_NO_EEPROM ) +return ; +mutex_lock (&db->addr_lock);spin_lock_irqsave (&db->lock, flags);
include/linux/dm9000.h +1 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#define DM9000_PLATF_16BITONLY (0x0002)#define DM9000_PLATF_32BITONLY (0x0004)#define DM9000_PLATF_EXT_PHY (0x0008) +#define DM9000_PLATF_NO_EEPROM (0x0010)/* platfrom data for platfrom device structure's platfrom_data field */
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 20/22 NET: DM9000: Add support for MII ioctl() calls
In reply to Ben DooksAdd entry to handle the MII ioctl() calls via thegeneric_mii_ioctl call.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +13 -0
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ static int dm9000_mii_thread(void *data)static void dm9000_init_dm9000 (struct net_device *); +static int dm9000_ioctl (struct net_device *dev,struct ifreq *req,int cmd); +static struct net_device_stats *dm9000_get_stats (struct net_device *);static irqreturn_t dm9000_interrupt (int ,void *);
@@ -337,6 +339,16 @@ static void dm9000_poll_controller(struc }#endif +static int dm9000_ioctl (struct net_device *dev,struct ifreq *req,int cmd) +{ +board_info_t *dm =to_dm9000_board (dev); + +if (!netif_running (dev)) +return -EINVAL ; + +return generic_mii_ioctl (&dm->mii,if_mii (req), cmd,NULL ); +} +/* ethtool ops */ static void dm9000_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -669,6 +681,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde ndev->get_stats = &dm9000_get_stats; ndev->set_multicast_list = &dm9000_hash_table; ndev->ethtool_ops = &dm9000_ethtool_ops; + ndev->do_ioctl = &dm9000_ioctl;#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER ndev->poll_controller = &dm9000_poll_controller;
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 21/22 NET: DM9000: Update retry count whilst identifying chip
In reply to Ben DooksReading the ID register does not always return the correct ID from the device, so we retry several times to see if we get a correct value.
These failures seem to be excaserbated by the speed of the access to the chip (possibly time between issuing the address and then the data cycle).
drivers/net/dm9000.c +1 -1
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdedm9000_reset (db);/* try two times, DM9000 sometimes gets the first read wrong */ -for (i =0 ; i <2 ; i++) { +for (i =0 ; i <8 ; i++) { id_val =ior (db,DM9000_VIDL ); id_val |= (u32 )ior (db,DM9000_VIDH ) <<8 ; id_val |= (u32 )ior (db,DM9000_PIDL ) <<16 ;
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
PATCH 22/22 NET: DM9000: Show the MAC address source after printing MAC
In reply to Ben DooksShow whether the MAC address was read from the EEPROM or the onboard PAR registers.
drivers/net/dm9000.c +6 -2
@@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdestruct dm9000_plat_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;struct board_info *db;/* Point a board information structure */ struct net_device *ndev; +const unsigned char *mac_src;unsigned long base;int ret =0 ;int iosize;
@@ -696,13 +697,16 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde db->mii.mdio_read = dm9000_phy_read; db->mii.mdio_write = dm9000_phy_write; + mac_src ="eeprom" ; +/* try reading the node address from the attached EEPROM */ for (i =0 ; i <6 ; i +=2 )dm9000_read_eeprom (db, i /2 , ndev->dev_addr+i);if (!is_valid_ether_addr (ndev->dev_addr)) {/* try reading from mac */ - + + mac_src ="chip" ;for (i =0 ; i <6 ; i++) ndev->dev_addr[i] =ior (db, i+DM9000_PAR ); }
@@ -719,7 +723,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde ndev->name, db->io_addr, db->io_data, ndev->irq);for (i =0 ; i <5 ; i++)printk ("%02x:" , ndev->dev_addr[i]); -printk ("%02x\n" , ndev->dev_addr[5 ]); +printk ("%02x (%s)\n" , ndev->dev_addr[5 ], mac_src); }return 0 ;
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Re: [patch 22/22] NET: DM9000: Show the MAC address source after printing MAC
ACK patches 16-22
Re: [patch 22/22] NET: DM9000: Show the MAC address source after printing MAC
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Garzik
ACK patches 16-22
Is reposting here ok to get these queued for the next kernel release, or are there people to CC: for this?
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Quoted 4 lines · On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:39:10 +0000 Ben Dooks <[email protected]> wrote:
This is my current proposed patch series to the DM9000 driver for both general cleanups, support for ethtool and to make the code better.
You could also change all instances of dev->priv with netdev_priv(dev).
Signature · 1 line
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Quoted 9 lines · Stephen Hemminger
Quoted 4 lines · On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:39:10 +0000 Ben Dooks <[email protected]> wrote:
This is my current proposed patch series to the DM9000 driver for both general cleanups, support for ethtool and to make the code better.
You could also change all instances of
dev->privwithnetdev_priv(dev).
Ok, will add that to the patch set.
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
Quoted 3 lines · Ben Dooks
This is my current proposed patch series to the DM9000 driver for both general cleanups, support for ethtool and to make the code better.
Apologies, it seems that when I updated it to 2.6.24-rc3 it turns out I applied it without first upgrading the underlying kernel source to that version. I will post a new series to the list once i've fixed up all the changes.
Signature · 3 lines
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'