Skip to contentSkip to conversation

net/irda/parameters.c: Trivial fixes

PATCH In review Richard Knutsson 2 participants 3 messages Nov 24, 2007 – Nov 26, 2007 Networking

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 net/irda/parameters.c: Trivial fixes

Make a single va_start() -> va_end() path + fixing:
CHECK /home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c
/home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c:466:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer /home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c:520:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer /home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c:573:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

---
Compile-tested on i386 with allyesconfig and allmodconfig.

net/irda/parameters.c +11 -11
index 2627dad..bf19071 100644
@@ -368,10 +368,11 @@ int irda_param_pack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 	va_list args;
 	char *p;
 	int n = 0;
+	int retval = 0;
 
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 
-	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0'; p++) {
+	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0' && retval == 0; p++) {
 		switch (*p) {
 		case 'b':  /* 8 bits unsigned byte */
 			buf[n++] = (__u8)va_arg(args, int);
@@ -392,13 +393,12 @@ int irda_param_pack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 			break;
 #endif
 		default:
-			va_end(args);
-			return -1;
+			retval = -1;
 		}
 	}
 	va_end(args);
 
-	return 0;
+	return retval;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(irda_param_pack);
 
@@ -411,10 +411,11 @@ static int irda_param_unpack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 	va_list args;
 	char *p;
 	int n = 0;
+	int retval = 0;
 
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 
-	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0'; p++) {
+	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0' && retval == 0; p++) {
 		switch (*p) {
 		case 'b':  /* 8 bits byte */
 			arg.ip = va_arg(args, __u32 *);
@@ -436,14 +437,13 @@ static int irda_param_unpack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 			break;
 #endif
 		default:
-			va_end(args);
-			return -1;
+			retval = -1;
 		}
 
 	}
 	va_end(args);
 
-	return 0;
+	return retval;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ int irda_param_insert(void *self, __u8 pi, __u8 *buf, int len,
 	int n = 0;
 
 	IRDA_ASSERT(buf != NULL, return ret;);
-	IRDA_ASSERT(info != 0, return ret;);
+	IRDA_ASSERT(info != NULL, return ret;);
 
 	pi_minor = pi & info->pi_mask;
 	pi_major = pi >> info->pi_major_offset;
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static int irda_param_extract(void *self, __u8 *buf, int len,
 	int n = 0;
 
 	IRDA_ASSERT(buf != NULL, return ret;);
-	IRDA_ASSERT(info != 0, return ret;);
+	IRDA_ASSERT(info != NULL, return ret;);
 
 	pi_minor = buf[n] & info->pi_mask;
 	pi_major = buf[n] >> info->pi_major_offset;
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ int irda_param_extract_all(void *self, __u8 *buf, int len,
 	int n = 0;
 
 	IRDA_ASSERT(buf != NULL, return ret;);
-	IRDA_ASSERT(info != 0, return ret;);
+	IRDA_ASSERT(info != NULL, return ret;);
 
 	/*
 	 * Parse all parameters. Each parameter must be at least two bytes
#1 lore raw

Hi Richard,

Quoted 1 line · Richard Knutsson

Make a single va_start() -> va_end() path + fixing:

Ok, this should be 2 separate patches then.
The warning fixes are all good, but I fail to see the point of the va_end() one. That doesn't seem to bring any sort of improvement while adding one variable to the stack and one loop test. Any explanation here ?

I'll push the warning fix for now, thanks.

Cheers,
Samuel.

Quoted 100 lines

CHECK /home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c
/home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c:466:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer /home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c:520:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer /home/kernel/src/net/irda/parameters.c:573:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

---
Compile-tested on i386 with allyesconfig and allmodconfig.

net/irda/parameters.c +11 -11
index 2627dad..bf19071 100644
@@ -368,10 +368,11 @@ int irda_param_pack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 	va_list args;
 	char *p;
 	int n = 0;
+	int retval = 0;
 
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 
-	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0'; p++) {
+	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0' && retval == 0; p++) {
 		switch (*p) {
 		case 'b':  /* 8 bits unsigned byte */
 			buf[n++] = (__u8)va_arg(args, int);
@@ -392,13 +393,12 @@ int irda_param_pack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 			break;
 #endif
 		default:
-			va_end(args);
-			return -1;
+			retval = -1;
 		}
 	}
 	va_end(args);
 
-	return 0;
+	return retval;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(irda_param_pack);
 
@@ -411,10 +411,11 @@ static int irda_param_unpack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 	va_list args;
 	char *p;
 	int n = 0;
+	int retval = 0;
 
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 
-	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0'; p++) {
+	for (p = fmt; *p != '\0' && retval == 0; p++) {
 		switch (*p) {
 		case 'b':  /* 8 bits byte */
 			arg.ip = va_arg(args, __u32 *);
@@ -436,14 +437,13 @@ static int irda_param_unpack(__u8 *buf, char *fmt, ...)
 			break;
 #endif
 		default:
-			va_end(args);
-			return -1;
+			retval = -1;
 		}
 
 	}
 	va_end(args);
 
-	return 0;
+	return retval;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ int irda_param_insert(void *self, __u8 pi, __u8 *buf, int len,
 	int n = 0;
 
 	IRDA_ASSERT(buf != NULL, return ret;);
-	IRDA_ASSERT(info != 0, return ret;);
+	IRDA_ASSERT(info != NULL, return ret;);
 
 	pi_minor = pi & info->pi_mask;
 	pi_major = pi >> info->pi_major_offset;
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static int irda_param_extract(void *self, __u8 *buf, int len,
 	int n = 0;
 
 	IRDA_ASSERT(buf != NULL, return ret;);
-	IRDA_ASSERT(info != 0, return ret;);
+	IRDA_ASSERT(info != NULL, return ret;);
 
 	pi_minor = buf[n] & info->pi_mask;
 	pi_major = buf[n] >> info->pi_major_offset;
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ int irda_param_extract_all(void *self, __u8 *buf, int len,
 	int n = 0;
 
 	IRDA_ASSERT(buf != NULL, return ret;);
-	IRDA_ASSERT(info != 0, return ret;);
+	IRDA_ASSERT(info != NULL, return ret;);
 
 	/*
 	 * Parse all parameters. Each parameter must be at least two bytes
#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Samuel Ortiz

Hi Richard,

Quoted 2 lines · Richard Knutsson

Make a single va_start() -> va_end() path + fixing:

Ok, this should be 2 separate patches then.

Thought about it, but they were so simple, I believed they would better be merged...

Quoted 4 lines

The warning fixes are all good, but I fail to see the point of the va_end() one. That doesn't seem to bring any sort of improvement while adding one variable to the stack and one loop test. Any explanation here ?

Not really. Many seem to like a single return and since this made it one va_end() to every va_start(), I thought it would be appropriate. But if not, then I will only filter this hit out from the va_start()->va_end()-testing and get going.

Quoted 2 lines

I'll push the warning fix for now, thanks.

Alright, thank you.

Quoted 4 lines

Cheers,
Samuel.

cu
Richard Knutsson