Skip to contentSkip to conversation

strange batman aborting

B.A.T.M.A.N. Jan Hetges 4 participants 8 messages Dec 6, 2007 – Dec 10, 2007

lore
Share & tools
lore

Jan Hetges

author
#0 lore raw

Hi All
after two weeks uptime bmxd_rv804 just died! and not only that one, but on a neighbouring node (~5 days uptime) as well.
So i restarted them, and about 26hrs later, they are both dead again. So i enabled Lui's watchout4batman, maybe i see at least, which one dies first. Only unnormal in the log:
user.warn kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
any ideas?

cheers

--Jan

p.s. both boxes run kamikaze 7.07 i386

#1 lore raw

Hi jan,

just sitting here with lui and discussing your problem... batman usually terminates itself when it finds a firewall blocking its own packets. Seems like your firewall starts to drop packets beause the maximum number of possible connection tracking has been exceeded. You can find more information about that (and also how to increase the limit) here:
http://www.fli4l.de/fileadmin/doc/deutsch/html/fli4l-3.1.3/node9.html

to see the currently tracked connection look at
cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack

ciao,
lui, axel

Quoted 14 lines · Jan Hetges

Hi All
after two weeks uptime bmxd_rv804 just died! and not only that one, but on a neighbouring node (~5 days uptime) as well.
So i restarted them, and about 26hrs later, they are both dead again. So i enabled Lui's watchout4batman, maybe i see at least, which one dies first. Only unnormal in the log:
user.warn kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
any ideas?

cheers

--Jan

p.s. both boxes run kamikaze 7.07 i386

#2 lore raw
In reply to Jan Hetges

This table full thingy could be that you are reaching your upper limit on connections. Perhaps someone playing with bittorrent (or similar) on your network? You either increase the maximum number of connections or you decrease the timeout values.
Just an idea...

Pele

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan Hetges
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] strange batman aborting

Hi All
after two weeks uptime bmxd_rv804 just died! and not only that one, but on a neighbouring node (~5 days uptime) as well.
So i restarted them, and about 26hrs later, they are both dead again. So i enabled Lui's watchout4batman, maybe i see at least, which one dies first. Only unnormal in the log:
user.warn kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
any ideas?

cheers

--Jan

p.s. both boxes run kamikaze 7.07 i386

author
#3 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Predrag Balorda

connections. Perhaps someone playing with bittorrent (or similar) on your

no, two infected windoze boxes in my favourite e-cafe looking for new friends (with port 135 open) in neighbouring networks ;-)

cheers

--Jan

#4 lore raw
In reply to Jan Hetges
Quoted 3 lines · Jan Hetges

Only unnormal in the log:
user.warn kernel: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
any ideas?

I've had the same Problem (independent from batmand) on some kamikaze-boxes. You can try to enlarge the max-memory for conntrack (default is 2048):

Quoted 6 lines
root@MB-1-WDS:~$ sysctl net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 2048
root@MB-1-WDS:~$ sysctl -w net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max=8192
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 8192
root@MB-1-WDS:~$ sysctl net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max       
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 8192

append something like this to /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max=8192

Regards
tetzlav

#6 lore raw

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] exp-rv811 and exp-864 non-interoperable?

Before I go round upgrading my routers, are these two incompatible because it seems so? If so then I'll need to figure out the exact order of upgrading (i.e furthest first - I don't want to have to climb roofs or walk too long)

Best regards,

Pele

P.S. also has anyone compared network throughput between beta and exp and are there any benefits to beta over exp?
P.P.S I'm experimenting with PoE and guess which process is the first that gets killed because of undervoltage?! :-)

author
#7 lore raw

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] exp-rv811 and exp-864 non-interoperable?

Hi
first: could you please open a new tread, istead of replying OT ?!

Quoted 3 lines · Predrag Balorda

Before I go round upgrading my routers, are these two incompatible because it seems so? If so then I'll need to figure out the exact order of upgrading (i.e furthest first - I don't want to have to climb roofs or walk too long)

if you read the ChangeLog, you see:
12/09/07 15:48:20 863 863 axel Incremented Compatibility Version !!

cheers

--Jan

Quoted 14 lines

Best regards,

Pele

P.S. also has anyone compared network throughput between beta and exp and are there any benefits to beta over exp?
P.P.S I'm experimenting with PoE and guess which process is the first that gets killed because of undervoltage?! :-)

_______________________________________________
B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n